Skip to main content
Download PDF

Deamidation-related blood biomarkers show promise for early diagnostics of neurodegeneration

Biomarker Research volume 10, Article number: 91 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The strongest risk factor of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) is aging. Spontaneous asparaginyl deamidation leading to formation of isoaspartate (isoAsp) has been correlated with protein aggregation in NDDs.

Methods

Two cohorts consisting of 140 subjects were studied. Cohort 1 contained patients with AD and healthy controls, while Cohort 2 recruited subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), vascular dementia (VaD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy controls. The levels of isoAsp in plasma human albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in plasma, as well as the levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) specific against deamidated HSA were measured. Apart from the memory tests, plasma biomarkers for NDDs reported in literature were also quantified, including amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42, neurofilament light protein (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) protein.

Results

Deamidation products of blood albumin were significantly elevated in vascular dementia and frontotemporal dementia (P < 0.05), but less so in PD. Intriguingly, the deamidation levels were significantly (P < 0.01) associated with the memory test scores for all tested subjects. Deamidation biomarkers performed superiorly (accuracy up to 92%) compared with blood biomarkers Aß42/Aß40, NfL, GFAP and p-tau181 in separating mild cognitive impairment from healthy controls.

Conclusion

We demonstrated the diagnostic capacity of deamidation-related biomarkers in predicting NDDs at the early stage of disease, and the biomarker levels significantly correlated with cognitive decline, strongly supporting the role of deamidation in triggering neurodegeneration and early stages of disease development. Prospective longitudinal studies with a longer observation period and larger cohorts should provide a more detailed picture of the deamidation role in NDD progression.

Background

Deamidation of asparagine (Asn) residue is a spontaneous, non-enzymatic protein degradation process resulting in the formation of damaging isoaspartate (isoAsp). As isoAsp residues accumulate in proteins, the latter lose their native structure, function and solubility [1]. A body of research has demonstrated that the accumulation of isoAsp triggers protein aggregation, which ultimately leads to the onset and progress of multiple disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) [2,3,4,5,6,7]. One of the evidence was found in 1990s that the formation of isoAsp in amyloid beta (Aß) peptide, especially in position 7, facilitates its aggregation, and thus forming amyloid plaques in the brain [7].

NDDs, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD), are usually defined as the progressive loss of structure and function in neurons and axons of the central nervous system. The NDD diagnostics is usually based on clinical features, such as cognitive decline and movement disorders, as well as on neuroimaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, molecular biomarkers reflecting protein pathology and aggregation has gained increased interest of NDD researchers. Apart from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (e.g., amyloid β (Aβ), tau, α-synuclein, etc.) obtaining of which is sometimes viewed as complicated, invasive and/or expensive, several blood biomarkers have emerged in recent years, such as neurofilament light protein (NfL) [8,9,10], phosphorylated tau (p-tau) [11,12,13] and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [14,15,16]. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these blood biomarkers is not yet fully established, especially for early disease stages, and thus new reliable, specific, low-cost blood biomarkers are highly desirable. Besides, the majority of blood biomarker characterization studies concerned separating diagnosed AD from healthy controls, while much less results have been published on the more challenging task of diagnosing early neurodegeneration stages, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ahead of diagnosed dementia.

Our recent findings have strengthened the link between isoAsp and AD pathology [17]. Using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [18], we discovered that the accumulation of isoAsp in human serum albumin (HSA) leads to a diminished HSA capacity to carry Aß and p-tau, and thus to clear these damaging molecules in the blood circulatory system, which has been recognized as a major contributor to their accumulation in brain [19]. By studying an Amsterdam cohort, we have found that isoAsp levels in HSA strongly correlate with AD [17]. Furthermore, native immunoglobulins (IgGs) specific to deamidated HSA that could protect the human organism from the damaging effect of deamidation have been found significantly reduced in AD [17]. However, questions remained related to the performance of these biomarkers in non-Caucasian patients, specificity to AD of these biomarkers, and their ability to detect early disease stages.

To address these issues, we recruited a Shanghai cohort with several kinds of NDDs as well as subjects with MCI, and compared the performance of the deamidation biomarkers with other plasma NDD markers. The central hypothesis under verification was that accumulation of deamidation products due to breakdown of the isoAsp repair/removal mechanisms precedes most processes in AD initiation, and thus deamidation biomarkers might exhibit high sensitivity in detecting early stages of neurodegeneration.

Study conclusions and implications

In this follow-up study we first confirmed on Shanghai cohort our earlier findings on Amsterdam cohort that isoAsp in plasma HSA is significantly increased (P < 0.0001) while the anti-aHSA IgG levels are lower (P < 0.0001) in AD patients compared to healthy controls. Then we measured the levels of these two biomarkers in other NDDs, such as VaD, FTD and PD, and found behavior similar to AD in the first two diseases (P < 0.01). However, in PD the results didn’t reach statistical significance, possibly due to a higher cognitive performance in PD group compared to other disease groups. Then we tested the performance of the deamidation biomarkers for MCI ahead of dementia diagnosis. This performance was found to be superior compared to other tested blood biomarkers, reaching the impressive accuracy of 92%. Then we tested the association of deamidation biomarkers with other analyzed parameters and discovered strong correlation with cognitive scores of the patients and controls. Taken together, these results strongly support the role of deamidation in NDD etiology, and open prospects of using deamidation biomarkers in early disease diagnostics.

Methods

Participants

Patients (n = 100: AD, 20; VaD, 20; FTD, 20; PD, 20; MCI, 20) in the study were recruited from the Huashan Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China). Matched healthy controls (n = 40) were recruited from the Chinese Alzheimer’s Biomarker and LifestylE (CABLE; Qingdao, China) study previously described in detail [20,21,22]. The participants capable of communicating, cooperating with physical and cognitive examinations, and giving consent to the blood draw as well as other necessary ancillary diagnostic tests were included. We excluded participants with severe systemic illness or central nervous system diseases attributed to non-NDDs, such as central nervous system infectious diseases and epilepsy. All procedures conformed to the tenets set forth by the Helsinki Declaration. All participants or legal guardians gave their written informed consent. Ethics approval was received from the institutional review boards of each participating center.

Diagnostic procedures

General cognitive tests including Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were performed by neuropsychological professionals blinded to the study design and subsequent procedures. Participants without formal education completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) questionnaire instead of the original MoCA. Some other tests critical for diagnosis like Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) were also performed. Small portions of the translated international questionnaires were appropriately adjusted to ensure applicability to the Chinese Han population.

Diagnoses were made by experienced neurologists who were unaware of the research procedures. AD dementia was diagnosed according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria [23], as well as the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) research framework [24]. All patients with AD dementia had strong PET evidence of the disease or CSF-confirmed Aβ-positive pathology. VaD was diagnosed according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria [25]. FTD was diagnosed according to the revised criteria set forth by the International Behavioral Variant of FTD Criteria Consortium [26]. PD was diagnosed according to the clinical criteria set forth by the International Movement Disorders Society (MDS) in 2015 [27]. MCI was diagnosed when there was objective evidence of cognitive decline while no significant evidence of impaired social or self-care ability. Healthy individuals recruited in the study were required to be matched to the patients with AD in terms of age and sex. In addition, all controls had an MMSE score > 24 at the screening visit and no signs of cognitive decline, thus not meeting the criteria for MCI or any NDD.

Blood sample collection and analyses

All laboratory personnel were blinded to clinical information. To obtain plasma, venous blood samples collected in EDTA-containing tubes were centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was immediately removed, frozen in 200 μL aliquots, and stored at -80 °C until further processing.

Plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL levels were quantified using single molecule arrays (SiMoA), an ultra-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique on an automated SiMoA HD-X platform (Quanterix, Billerica, MA, USA). The SiMoA Human Neurology 4-Plex E assay was used to measure GFAP, Aβ40, Aβ42, and NfL levels, whereas p-tau181 was quantified by the SiMoA p-tau181 Advantage V2 assay.

Quantification of isoAsp in blood HSA and IgGs against deamidated HSA

As described before [18], the plasma samples were sonicated, centrifuged and their protein concentrations were measured. All plasma samples and HSA standards were diluted to 5 μg/mL and analyzed in triplicates by an indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The isoAsp levels in each blood sample were calculated according to the standard curve of HSA constructed from standards on each plate. The results were normalized by the average value in the control group.

The IgG antibodies were purified from plasma using the Melon Gel IgG Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Diego, CA, USA). To determine in each sample the amount of IgG against aged HSA (aHSA, ≈60% isoAsp), the purified IgG antibodies were used as the primary antibody in the indirect ELISA [17], while the secondary antibody was Goat anti-Human IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody conjugated with HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Diego, CA, USA). To eliminate the effect of sample location on the plate, the data were normalized by the average reading in each row and column.

Statistical analysis

The data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0.2) and coding using R software (version 3.4.4). The parameters distributed normally were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and group differences were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Otherwise, parameters were stated as medians with interquartile ranges, and a Mann-Whitney U test or a Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of Cohort 1 were adjusted for age, sex, education years and APOE ε4 carrier status according to the reported method [28, 29], while the ROC curves of Cohort 2 were adjusted for age, sex, and education years.

Results

Characteristics of participants

The baseline characteristics of the two cohorts acquired in the study are shown in Table 1. In Cohort 1, significant differences between the control and AD subjects were observed in cognitive scores MMSE and MoCA, as well as plasma biomarkers Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, p-tau181, NfL and GFAP (P < 0.05), while no significant difference was found in plasma Aβ40. In Cohort 2, significant differences were discovered in MMSE, MoCA, plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL and GFAP among the groups of control, MCI and other NDDs (P < 0.05), while no difference was observed among the groups in Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau181.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants in Cohort 1 and 2
Full size table

Validating the efficacy of deamidation biomarkers in AD diagnostics

Cohort 1 data showed the increased levels of isoAsp in HSA (Fig. 1a) and the deficiency of IgGs against deamidated HSA in AD blood compared to controls (Fig. 1b), validating the results from Amsterdam cohort [17]. The normalized signals reflecting the isoAsp level in plasma HSA were increased by 9% on average (P < 0.0001) while the average signal of anti-aHSA IgG was lower by 6% (P < 0.0001) in AD patients compared to healthy donors. In parallel, the isoAsp/anti-aHSA IgG (IsoAsp/IgG) ratio was 15% higher in AD than controls (P < 0.0001, Fig. 1c). The diagnostic values of the three above parameters were assessed using ROC curves and the area under the curve (AUC) values (Fig. 1d), with AUC interpreted as the diagnostic accuracy. All of the AUCs were above 0.80, suggesting a good differentiation between AD and control. We also compared the AUCs of deamidation parameters with other plasma biomarkers, and the former significantly surpassed Aß40 and Aß42, but somewhat underperformed NfL, GFAP and p-tau181, the AUCs of which were above 0.9 (Fig. 1e).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Validating the deamidation biomarkers in differentiating AD vs Control. a-c IsoAsp levels in HSA are increased (a), and the anti-aHSA IgG levels are decreased in AD compared to Control (b); the isoAsp/anti-aHSA IgG ratios are also different (c). The ROC curves for differentiating AD and controls by (d) isoAsp in HSA, anti-aHSA IgG and isoAsp/anti-aHSA IgG ratio. (e) The comparison of AUCs of all blood biomarkers

Full size image

Diagnostic value of deamidation biomarkers for other NDDs

In comparison between control in Cohort 2, the isoAsp levels in plasma HSA were significantly elevated (by ≥18%) in MCI (P < 0.001), VaD (P < 0.01) and FTD (P < 0.001), but not in PD despite a 10% average elevation (Fig. 2a). The anti-aHSA IgG levels were found to be significantly lower in MCI (P < 0.001) and FTD (P < 0.01), but not in VaD and PD (Fig. 2b). The IsoAsp/IgG ratios also showed a significant difference in MCI (P < 0.001), VaD (P < 0.01) and FTD (P < 0.001), with median values ≥19% compared to control (Fig. 2c). No significant difference was observed for PD despite an elevated by 9% average value, possibly due to the larger spread of data within PD group and the higher memory test scores compared with other groups of patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differentiation among various NDDs and disease stages. a-c Distinguishing Control from MCI and Other NDDs (VaD, FTD and PD). d-f The ROC curves for differentiation between (d) Other dementia (VaD and FTD) and control, (e) MCI and control. f The comparison of AUCs of all blood biomarkers

Full size image

The AUCs of ROC curves of different comparisons were calculated (Fig. 2d-g). Collectively, the deamidation biomarkers showed reasonable efficacy (AUC = 0.78..0.83) in diagnosing other dementia types than AD (Fig. 2e).

Diagnostic values of deamidation biomarkers for MCI

A very promising efficacy (AUC = 0.86..0.92) was obtained by deamidation biomarkers for separating MCI ahead of dementia diagnosis from healthy controls (Fig. 2d). More specifically, the IsoAsp/IgG ratio ranked the first among all plasma biomarkers (AUC = 0.92), followed by anti-aHSA IgG (AUC = 0.90), p-tau181 (both AUC = 0.87) and isoAsp (AUC = 0.86) (Fig. 2f). For comparison, all AUCs of the plasma biomarkers for early Aß pathology studied in a recent work (p-tau181, p-tau231, p-tau217, NfL, GFAP and Aß42/Aß40) were below 0.86 [30].

Association of deamidation biomarkers with other cognitive parameters

Strong positive correlations were discovered in both cohorts between cognitive scores (MMSE and MoCA) and the anti-aHSA IgG levels (P < 0.01), while there was a significant negative correlation between cognitive scores and the isoAsp levels in plasma HSA as well as IsoAsp/IgG ratio (P < 0.01), supporting the link between deamidation and the early onset of disease pathology (Fig. 3a-f). We also found a negative relationship of anti-aHSA IgG with plasma Aß40, Aß42/Aß40 ratio, GFAP and NfL, while both isoAsp and the IsoAsp/IgG ratio were positively associated with them (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association deamidation biomarkers with memory scores. Linear regression analyses for MMSE score (a-c) and MoCA score (d-f) versus (a, d) isoAsp in HSA, (b, e) anti-aHSA IgG, (c, f) isoAsp/anti-aHSA IgG ratio

Full size image

Discussion

The findings in this work validated the previous discovery of the elevated isoAsp levels in HSA and reduced anti-aHSA IgG in AD plasma compared to controls [17]. Furthermore, we explored the potential of deamidation biomarkers in other NDDs and in early diagnostics of dementia. The isoAsp levels were found significantly elevated in MCI, FTD and VaD (P < 0.01) and the anti-aHSA IgG levels were reduced in MCI and VaD (P < 0.01). The common causative link between these different types of dementia seems to be the failure of isoAsp clearance. A possible exception was PD, in which the deamidation-related biomarkers changed moderately without reaching statistical significance. This could be due to the fact that PD has distinctly different disease trajectory from other dementia types [27].

Arguably, the most significant finding was the superior performance of the deamidation indicators among all tested blood biomarkers in detection of MCI ahead of dementia diagnosis. However, the cohort size here was small, thereby requiring validation of the results with a larger cohort in the future. Nevertheless, together with a strong relationship between the deamidation biomarkers and cognitive parameters in all 140 subjects, this finding supports the role of deamidation in dementia initiation.

Indeed, pathological protein aggregation and abnormal accumulation intra- or extracellularly are the common characteristics shared in NDDs at autopsy. These protein aggregates participate in progressive neuronal dysfunction, neuroinflammation and programmed cell death, occurring before the initiation of clinical features [31, 32]. The disease-specific proteins can be natively unfolded (e.g., microtubule tau protein in AD and FTD) or formed via partially unfolded intermediates (Aß in AD). In all cases deamidation and isoaspartate formation can enhance the aggregation rate as the polypeptide backbone extension resulting from the methylene rearrangement from the side chain disrupts the protein structure. As HSA is the most abundant protein in blood and participates in clearance of molecules implicated in the NDD onset, such as Aß and p-tau [17, 33], HSA aggregation caused by deamidation and the resulting loss of clearance capacity may be one of the main risk factors for NDDs.

Moreover, deamidation is one of the causes of human autoimmune response since isoaspartate is immunogenic [34, 35], which may cause T cells circumvent the non-self/self-barrier that eventually cause age-related autoimmune diseases [36]. For example, deamidation of myelin proteins has been found to initiate the immune response leading to multiple sclerosis [37]. Therefore, it will be of interest to investigate the role of deamidated HSA in autoimmune diseases in the future.

Summarizing our previous work and current findings, we propose the following deamidation-driven mechanism of NDD initiation (Fig. 4). In a healthy body, spontaneously deamidated HSA is repaired by the enzyme PIMT in liver using SAM as a cofactor; the anti-aHSA antibodies in blood remove deamidated HSA, and the newly synthesized HSA molecules restore homeostasis. When in aging the SAM levels become insufficient due to reduced synthesis and increased consumption [38], PIMT-mediated isoAsp repair diminishes, the isoAsp starts to accumulate in blood proteins, depleting the stock of the native antibodies against isoAsp. This causes reduced removal of deamidated HSA and formation of HSA aggregates [17]. Deamidated and aggregating HSA has a diminished capacity of binding with Aβ, p-tau, metal ions and other molecules both in blood and CSF, reducing their clearance from brain and contributing to their enhanced aggregation there [17]. It is also plausible that the reduced isoAsp repair and removal of deamidation products concerns brain proteins involved in maintaining cognitive functions. Therefore, the isoAsp level in blood may act as a “thermometer” for the state of protein health in general, reflecting both cognitive decline and the onset of neurodegenerative diseases. Importantly, such “thermometer” may start showing abnormal values long before the onset of clinical symptoms and monitor the cognitive decline, thus probably enabling early detection of slight cognitive impairment via a non-invasive and scalable tool, which has been called for recently [39].

Fig. 4
figure 4

The model connecting the overall state of isoAsp repair/removal in proteins with the onset of neurodegenerative diseases, supporting early disease diagnostics by deamidation biomarkers. (Created with BioRender.com)

Full size image

Conclusion

This study validated our previous findings of the important role of blood protein deamidation in AD and discovered such a role in other NDDs, possibly excluding PD. An important finding is the promising performance of the deamidation biomarkers, namely levels of isoAsp and anti-aHSA IgGs, as well as the IsoAsp/IgG ratio, in early stages of mental decline and a significant correlation with mental scores. The cohort size in this study was relatively small. Thus, it is worth to further investigate the potential of these biomarkers in early NDD diagnostics in a broader longitudinal study capable of depicting a more nuanced picture of deamidation role in disease progression. Furthermore, in a future study more MCI participants should be recruited with follow-up data available to investigate the ability of deamidation biomarkers to predict the progression from MCI to probable AD. More types of NDD should be investigated, such as Huntington’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinocerebellar ataxias, etc., to fully define the specificity of deamidation biomarkers in NDD diagnostics.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this publication and/or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Aβ :

Amyloid beta

AD :

Alzheimer’s disease

aHSA :

Aged human serum albumin

APOE ε4 :

Apolipoprotein ε4

Asn :

Asparagine

Asp :

Aspartate

AUC :

Area under curve

ELISA :

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FTD :

Frontotemporal dementia

GFAP :

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

HSA :

Human serum albumin

IgG :

Immunoglobulin G

IsoAsp :

Isoaspartate

IsoAsp/IgG ratio :

Isoaspartate/Anti-aged-human-serum-albumin immunoglobulin G ratio

MCI :

Mild cognitive impairment

MMSE :

Mini-Mental Status Examination

MoCA :

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

NDDs :

Neurodegenerative diseases

NfL :

Neurofilament light protein

PD :

Parkinson’s disease

PIMT :

Protein isoaspartyl methyltransferase

p-tau :

Phosphorylated tau

ROC :

Receiver operating characteristic

SAM :

S-adenosylmethionine

SD :

Standard deviation

VaD :

Vascular dementia

References

  1. Johnson BA, et al. Protein carboxyl methyltransferase facilitates conversion of atypical L-Isoaspartyl peptides to Normal L-aspartyl peptides. J Biol Chem. 1987;262(12):5622–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee T, et al. The role of isoaspartate in fibrillation and its prevention by protein-L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2020;1864(3):129500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang HQ, et al. Prognostic polypeptide blood plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease progression. Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 2014;40(3):659–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang H, et al. Shotgun brain proteomics reveals early molecular signature in presymptomatic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(2):297–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang H, et al. Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment are associated with elevated levels of isoaspartyl residues in blood plasma proteins. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(1):113–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukuda H, et al. Synthesis, aggregation, and neurotoxicity of the Alzheimer's a beta 1-42 amyloid peptide and its isoaspartyl isomers. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9(7):953–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson BA, et al. Protein L-Isoaspartyl methyltransferase in Postmortem brains of aged humans. Neurobiol Aging. 1991;12(1):19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaiottino J, et al. Increased neurofilament light chain blood levels in neurodegenerative neurological diseases. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattsson N, et al. Association of Plasma Neurofilament Light with Neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(5):557–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CH, et al. Blood NfL: a biomarker for disease severity and progression in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2019;93(11):e1104–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanon O, et al. Plasma amyloid levels within the Alzheimer's process and correlations with central biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(7):858–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paraskevaidi M, et al. Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using spectrochemical analysis of blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(38):E7929–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mielke MM, et al. Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community. Nat Med. 2022;28(7):1398–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Geel WJ, et al. Measurement of glial fibrillary acidic protein in blood: an analytical method. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;326(1–2):151–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer CA, et al. Blood levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in patients with neurological diseases. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatterjee P, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic plasma biomarkers for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(6):1141–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, et al. Testing the link between isoaspartate and Alzheimer's disease etiology. Alzheimers Dement. 2022:1–12.

  18. Wang J, et al. First immunoassay for measuring isoaspartate in human serum albumin. Molecules. 2021;26(21).

  19. Cheng Y, Tian DY, Wang YJ. Peripheral clearance of brain-derived Abeta in Alzheimer's disease: pathophysiology and therapeutic perspectives. Transl Neurodegener. 2020;9(1):16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu W, et al. Amyloid pathologies modulate the associations of minimal depressive symptoms with cognitive impairments in older adults without dementia. Biol Psychiatry. 2021;89(8):766–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu H, et al. Tau pathologies mediate the association of blood pressure with cognitive impairment in adults without dementia: the CABLE study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;18:53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu W, et al. Sleep characteristics and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in cognitively intact older adults: the CABLE study. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(8):1146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McKhann G, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jack CR Jr, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roman GC, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN international workshop. Neurology. 1993;43(2):250–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rascovsky K, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 9):2456–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Postuma RB, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30(12):1591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berres M, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic scores with adjustment for covariates. Stat Med. 2008;27(10):1777–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Palmqvist S, et al. Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho-tau combined with other accessible measures. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):1034–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mila-Aloma M, et al. Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau217 as state markers of amyloid-beta pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2022.

  31. Schaffert LN, Carter WG. Do post-translational modifications influence protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2020;10(4).

  32. Dugger, B.N. and D.W. Dickson, Pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2017. 9(7).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim JW, et al. Serum albumin and beta-amyloid deposition in the human brain. Neurology. 2020;95(7):e815–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mamula MJ, et al. Isoaspartyl post-translational modification triggers autoimmune responses to self-proteins. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(32):22321–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Doyle HA, Gee RJ, Mamula MJ. Altered immunogenicity of isoaspartate containing proteins. Autoimmunity. 2007;40(2):131–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Truscott RJW. Degradation of Long-Lived Proteins as a Cause of Autoimmune Diseases. In: Long-lived Proteins in Human Aging and Disease; 2021. p. 159–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Truscott RJW, Friedrich MG. Can the fact that myelin proteins are old and break down explain the origin of multiple sclerosis in some people? J Clin Med. 2018;7(9).

  38. Hao X, et al. Immunoassay of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine: the methylation index as a biomarker for disease and health status. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khachaturian AS. Improving community health-care systems' early detection of cognitive decline and dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2022:1–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants who agreed to take part in this study and all the members involved in the selection and assessment.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This work has been supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Projects (2022ZD0211600), China Scholarship Council (KI-CSC program), Horizon 2020 project TopSpec, National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071201, 81971032), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No.2018SHZDZX01), Research Start-up Fund of Huashan Hospital (2022QD002), Excellence 2025 Talent Cultivation Program at Fudan University (3030277001).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jijing Wang and Ya-Ru Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jijing Wang & Roman A. Zubarev

  2. Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Ya-Ru Zhang, Xue-Ning Shen, Mei Cui, Qiang Dong & Jin-Tai Yu

  3. National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China

    Ya-Ru Zhang, Xue-Ning Shen, Mei Cui, Qiang Dong & Jin-Tai Yu

  4. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Jinming Han

  5. Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital Group, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Lan Tan

Authors
  1. Jijing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ya-Ru Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xue-Ning Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinming Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mei Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lan Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiang Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Roman A. Zubarev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jin-Tai Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JTY and RAZ conceived the study. JW, YRZ and SXN did the experiment and acquired the data. JW and YRZ analyzed the data and prepared the figures and tables. JW drafted the manuscript. RAZ, YRZ and JTY revised the manuscript. JH, MC, LT and QD critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Roman A. Zubarev or Jin-Tai Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants or legal guardians gave their written informed consent. Ethics approval was received from the institutional review boards of each participating center.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. The regression coefficients (R) between deamidation biomarkers and other indicators.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Zhang, YR., Shen, XN. et al. Deamidation-related blood biomarkers show promise for early diagnostics of neurodegeneration. Biomark Res 10, 91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-022-00435-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-022-00435-8

Keywords

  • Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs)
  • Early diagnosis
  • Blood biomarker
  • Deamidation
  • Isoaspartate
  • Human serum albumin (HSA)

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us