Skip to main content
Download PDF

p63 expression in human tumors and normal tissues: a tissue microarray study on 10,200 tumors

Biomarker Research volume 9, Article number: 7 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tumor protein 63 (p63) is a transcription factor of the p53 gene family involved in differentiation of several tissues including squamous epithelium. p63 immunohistochemistry is broadly used for tumor classification but published data on its expression in cancer is conflicting.

Methods

To comprehensively catalogue p63 expression, tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 12,620 tissue samples from 115 tumor entities and 76 normal tissue types were analyzed.

Results

p63 expression was seen in various normal tissues including squamous epithelium and urothelium. At least occasional weak p63 positivity could be detected in 61 (53%) of 115 different tumor types. The frequencies of p63 positivity was highest in squamous cell carcinomas irrespective of their origin (96–100%), thymic tumors (100%), urothelial carcinomas (81–100%), basal type tumors such as basal cell carcinomas (100%), and various salivary gland neoplasias (81–100%). As a rule, p63 was mostly expressed in cancers derived from p63 positive normal tissues and mostly not detectable in tumors derived from p63 negative cancers. However, exceptions from this rule occurred. A positive p63 immunostaining in cancers derived from p63 negative tissues was unrelated to aggressive phenotype in 422 pancreatic cancers, 160 endometrium cancers and 374 ovarian cancers and might be caused by aberrant squamous differentiation or represent stem cell properties. In 355 gastric cancers, aberrant p63 expression occurred in 4% and was linked to lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0208). Loss of p63 in urothelial carcinomas - derived from p63 positive urothelium - was significantly linked to advanced stage, high grade (p < 0.0001 each) and poor survival (p < 0.0001) and might reflect clinically relevant tumor dedifferentiation.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of p63 expression in specific tumor types makes p63 immunohistochemistry a suitable diagnostic tool. Loss of p63 expression might constitute a feature of aggressive cancers.

Introduction

Tumor protein 63 (p63) is a transcription factor of the p53 gene family encoded by the TP63 gene located at chromosome 3q28. p63 regulates the activity of a multitude of genes involved in growth and development of the ectoderm and derived structures and tissues, such as basal layer keratins and cell cycle control genes [1]. Accordingly, p63 expression is found in basal cell layers of various organs, squamous epithelial cells of many organs and urothelium [1,2,3,4]. p63 (syn. TAp63) is closely related to p40 (syn. ΔNp63) as both proteins represent isoforms of the p63 gene with distinct molecular functions [3]. While “full length” p63 (TAp63) activates p53 target genes such as p21 or BAX [4], the shorter transcript p40 (ΔNp63) inhibits activation of p53 and “full length” p63 [4,5,6].

In diagnostic pathology, the consistently high expression of p63 in specific cell and tissue types is exploited for diagnostic purposes. For example, p63 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is commonly used to mark cell types with critical impact on cancer diagnosis such as basal cells in prostatic and breast glands. Together with other antibodies, p63 is also routinely used for tumor type determination, for example distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in lung biopsies, or urothelial carcinomas from renal cell carcinoma in tumors arising in the kidney as well as determining the tumor origin of metastases from unknown primary tumors. Since the first description of p63 antibodies, more than 2000 studies have evaluated p63 expression by IHC in various tumors leading to quite discrepant p63 positivity rates in a number of tumor entities [2, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. For example, the fraction of p63 positive cases ranged from 0 to 77% in small cell lung cancer [19, 78], from 50 to 100% in squamous cell lung cancer [22, 52], 0 to 84% in Merkel cell carcinoma [30, 56], 0 to 82% in papillary thyroid carcinoma [36, 74], 1.4 to 100% in colorectal adenocarcinoma [9, 45], 0 to 100% in urothelial carcinoma [41, 76], 0 to 100% in mucinous ovarian carcinoma [7, 79], and from 0 to 25% in endometroid ovarian carcinoma [7, 79]. These conflicting data are likely to be caused by the use of different antibodies, immunostaining protocols, and criteria to determine p63 positivity in these studies.

To better understand the relative importance of p63 expression in different tumor types and normal tissues, a comprehensive study analyzing a large number of neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues under highly standardized conditions is needed. We thus analyzed p63 expression in more than 12,000 tumor tissue samples from 115 different tumor types and subtypes as well as 76 non-neoplastic tissue types by IHC in a tissue microarray (TMA) format.

Materials and methods

Tissue microarrays (TMAs)

Our normal tissue TMA was composed of 8 samples from 8 different donors for each of 76 different normal tissue types (608 samples on one slide). The cancer TMAs contained a total of 12,620 primary tumors from 115 tumor types and subtypes. Detailed histopathological data on grade, pT and pN status were available from 1708 cancers (stomach, pancreas, ovarian, endometrium, urinary bladder). Clinical follow up data were only available from 254 patients who had undergone cystectomy for muscle invasive (pT ≥ 2) urinary bladder cancer. In these patients the median follow-up time was 14 (range 1–77) months. Clinical follow up data from patients with carcinomas of the stomach, pancreas, ovarian, and endometrium are not available. The composition of both normal and cancer TMAs is described in detail in the results section. All samples come from the archives of the Institutes of Pathology of the University Hospital of Hamburg, Germany, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Germany, and the Academic Hospital Fuerth, Germany. No other information beyond the histological tumor type was available for these samples. Tissues were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and then embedded in paraffin. For TMA manufacturing a tumor containing donor block (at least 70% tumor cells in a sufficiently large area) of each patient was selected. Per tumor block/patient one TMA tissue spot (diameter: 0.6 mm) was transferred to an empty recipient TMA block. The use of remnants of archived diagnostic tissues for manufacturing of TMAs and their analysis for research purposes as well as patient data analysis has been approved by local laws (HmbKHG, §12) and by the local ethics committee (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF-049/09). All work has been carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Immunohistochemistry

Freshly cut TMA sections were immunostained on one day and in one experiment. Slides were deparaffinized and exposed to heat-induced antigen retrieval for 5 min in an autoclave at 121 °C in pH 7.8 buffer. Primary antibody specific for p63 (clone 7B4, dilution 1:100) was applied at 37 °C for 60 min. Bound antibody was then visualized using the EnVision Kit (Agilent, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s directions. For tumor tissues, the percentage of nuclear positive neoplastic cells was estimated, and the staining intensity was semiquantitatively recorded (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). For statistical analyses, the staining results were categorized into four groups. Tumors without any staining were considered negative. Tumors with 1+ staining intensity in ≤70% of cells and 2+ intensity in ≤30% of cells were considered weakly positive. Tumors with 1+ staining intensity in > 70% of cells, 2+ intensity in 31–70%, or 3+ intensity in ≤30% were considered moderately positive. Tumors with 2+ intensity in > 70% or 3+ intensity in > 30% of cells werde considered strongly positive.

Statistics

Statistical calculations were performed with JMP 14 software (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Contingency tables and the chi2-test were performed to search for associations between p63 and tumor phenotype. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier. The Log-Rank test was applied to detect significant differences between groups. A significant difference was assumed for a p-value of ≤0.05.

Results

Technical issues

A total of 10,200 (80.8%) of 12,620 tumor samples were interpretable in our TMA analysis. Non-interpretable samples either lacked unequivocal tumor cells or were lost from the TMA during the technical procedures. A statistical bias, which could potentially result from exclusion of non-interpretable samples, is highly unlikely in our study as non-interpretable samples were evenly distributed across all pathological diagnoses (Supplementary Table 1). On our normal tissue TMA, a sufficient number of samples was always interpretable per tissue type to determine the normal tissue p63 expression.

p63 in normal tissues

A strong nuclear p63 immunostaining was seen in squamous epithelium irrespective of its origin, peripheric germinative cells of sebaceous glands, urothelium, thymic epithelial cells, myoepithelial cells in breast, parotid, submandibulary and sublingual glands, basal cells in prostate, seminal vesicle, and respiratory epithelium, cytotrophoblast of first trimenon and mature placenta. The staining intensity was slightly decreasing from basal cells to the surface cell layer in squamous epithelia and in urothelium. A mild staining was seen in some lymphocytes and in high endothelial venules in lymph nodes. Representative images are given in Fig. 1. p63 staining was absent in aorta/intima, aorta/media, heart (left ventricle), striated muscle, skeletal muscle, skeletal muscle/tongue, uterus/myometrium, muscular wall of the GI-tract, renal pelvis and bladder, corpus spongiosum of the penis, ovarian stroma, fat, red and white pulp of the spleen, antrum and corpus of the stomach, mucosa and lamina propria of the stomach duodenum, ileum, appendix, colon descendens, rectum, and gallbladder, epithelium of the gallbladder, liver, pancreas, bone marrow, Brunner gland of the duodenum, cortex and medulla of the kidney, epididymis, testis, glands of the bronchus, endocervix, proliferative and secretory endometrium, mucosa of the fallopian tube, corpus luteum and follicular cyst of the ovary, adrenal gland, parathyroid, thyroid gland, stratum molecular and neuronorum of the cerebellum, grey and white cerebrum, and posterior and anterior lobe of the pituitary gland.

Fig. 1
figure 1

p63 expression in normal tissues. Strong p63 immunostaining is seen in squamous epithelium of the esophagus (a) urothelium of the urinary bladder (b), basal cells of respiratory epithelium (c) and of the prostate (d) and myoepithelial cells of the breast (e) and of the salivary glands (f)

Full size image

p63 in neoplastic tissues

Nuclear immunostaining was observed in 1940 (19.0%) of 10,200 interpretable tumors with 13.4% showing strong, 3.0% moderate and 2.6% weak staining intensity. At least an occasional weak p63 positivity could be detected in 61 of 115 (53.4%) different tumor types and tumor subtypes and 37 (32.2%) tumor types and tumor subtypes had at least one tumor exhibiting strong positivity. Representative images of p63 positive tumors are shown in Fig. 2. The highest frequencies of p63 positivity were seen in squamous cell carcinomas irrespective of their origin, thymic tumors, urothelial cancers and basal type tumors such as basal cell carcinomas and various salivary gland neoplasia. A detailed description of the immunostaining results is given in Table 1 and Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

p63 expression in cancerous tissues. Strong p63 immunostaining is seen in invasive urothelial carcinoma (a) gastric cancer, diffuse type (b), anal squamous cell carcinoma (c), gastric cancer, intestinal type (d), and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with focal squamous differentiation (e). Moderate intensity p63 staining is seen in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (f)

Full size image
Table 1 p63 immunostaining in human cancers
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Ranking order of p63 immunostaining in cancers. Both the frequency of positive cases (blue dots) and the frequency of strongly positive cases (red dots). The conspicuously low rate of strongly positive Whartin tumors is due to the fact, that only basal cells react with p63 resulting in a low overall percentage of positive cells. Fifty five additional tumor entities without any p63 positive cases are not shown due to space restrictions

Full size image

p63 expression, tumor phenotype and prognosis

p63 immunostaining was not associated with parameters of disease aggressiveness in 422 pancreatic carcinomas, 160 endometrium cancers, and 374 ovarian cancers (Table 2). In a cohort of 355 gastric carcinomas, p63 positivity was seen in 4% and was linked to nodal metastasis (p = 0.0208; Table 2). In urinary bladder cancer, reduced or absent p63 immunostaining was related to advanced stage and high-grade categories (p < 0.0001, Table 2) and reduced survival (p < 0.0001; Fig. 4).

Table 2 p63 immunostaining and tumor phenotype
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

p63 immunostaining and overall survival in urothelial carcinomas. All patients had at least pT2 cancers and were treated by cystectomy

Full size image

Discussion

The results of our study on 12,620 tissues show that p63 expression is largely limited to few normal tissues including squamous epithelium, urothelium, thymic epithelial cells and basal/myoepithelial cells of various epithelial organs. The fact that p63 expression in these cells is usually strong but completely undetectable in other tissues fits well with the known role of p63 in driving embryonal cellular evolution towards specific cell types. The S-shaped curve displaying the ranking order of p63 positive tumors demonstrates, that frequent and intensive p63 immunostaining is predominantly seen in these few cancers that appear to be derived from p63 positive normal cell types. The most commonly positive cancers include squamous cell carcinomas irrespective of their origin, thymic tumors, urothelial carcinomas and basal type tumors such as basal cell carcinomas and various salivary gland neoplasias.

However, in the majority of p63 positive tumor types, p63 expression was not seen in all cases. Absence of detectable p63 immunostaining in a tumor derived from a p63 expressing normal tissues may in some instances reflect inefficient immunostaining in cancers with inappropriate fixation or other preanalytical issues leading to tissue damage [80]. Our findings in 1038 analyzed urothelial cancers further indicate that p63 expression loss can occur as a result of cellular dedifferentiation during cancer progression. The progressive loss of p63 expression from pTa G2 low grade (0%) small cell urothelial cancer (89%) represents an example of progression associated p63 loss. The fact that p63 loss represents an ominous feature in urothelial carcinomas is also demonstrated by the worse prognosis in p63 negative as compared to p63 positive pT2–4 urothelial carcinomas. These data are in line with reports from other investigators also describing associations of p63 loss with advanced stage and poor prognosis in bladder cancer [41]. Other authors have also described a link between low p63 expression and poor prognosis in squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus [47] and the larynx [48].

Only nine of 115 cancer types (7.8% of analyzed tumor categories) had a prevalence of p63 positivity between 25 and 90%. These included teratoma and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In teratoma the “p63 immunostaining result” of a TMA spot was obviously driven by whether or not epithelial components represented in the spot physiologically expressed p63. In malignant lymphoma, the staining intensity was often moderate. This is reflective of the role of p63 in normal lymphocytes where few cells regularly showed weak to moderate expression. Occasional p63 expression in B-lymphocytes, mainly in germinal centers have been described in previous studies [2, 60]. The high rate of p63 positive B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is in line with reports from other authors describing common p63 expression, mainly in large cell Non-Hodgkin lymphomas but also in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and follicular lymphoma [2, 60, 81,82,83,84]. Due to the fact that both the TP63 gene and the Bcl-6 gene are located on chromosome 3q27(− 29) and Bcl-6 gene rearrangements are often seen in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) [85,86,87,88], it has been speculated that the close vicinity of TP63 to Bcl-6 may contribute to its potential involvement in DLBCL tumor progression [60]. However, associations between p63 and BCl-6 expression was not found in another study [84]. Moreover, it remains unclear whether the common translocation at 3q27 affects the expression or structure of the more distal p63 gene [60, 87].

A total of 29 (25%) cancer types and subtypes showed p63 positivity in 3 to 25% of analyzed cases. Very often, p63 staining did not involve the entire tumor mass in these cancers. Almost all of these entities are derived from tissues not normally expressing p63 suggesting neo-expression of p63 occurring during cancer development and progression. At least in a fraction of these tumors p63 neo-expression was obviously linked to focal squamous cell differentiation. Tumor types that are particularly known for occasionally containing squamous elements were common in the category of tumors with p63 positivity between 10 and 25% and included endometroid cancer and malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus as well as ovarian, pancreatic and cholangiocellular carcinomas. In other tumors with occasional occurrence of p63 positive cells, the phenomenon may reflect stemness properties as earlier shown for p63 expressing normal and cancerous cells [89,90,91] or be caused by incidental and possibly biologically irrelevant p63 neo-expression in dysregulated cancer cells. The fact that p63 neo-expression was unrelated to features of cancer aggressiveness in cohorts of 422 pancreatic, 374 ovarian, and 160 endometrium cancers argues against a major biologic impact of p63 expression in these tumors. The significantly higher rate of nodal metastasis in p63 positive gastric cancers may be explained by the known poor prognosis of adenosquamous gastric cancers [92].

Overall, these data demonstrate a broad diagnostic utility of p63 IHC for the categorization of cancers, all of which have previously been suggested. For example, p63 expression in a kidney tumor argues for urothelial carcinomas and against poorly differentiated or sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma in kidney masses [93]. Although several sarcomas showed limited p63 expression, the striking positivity in many sarcomatoid urothelial carcinomas suggests that p63 positivity - in organs where p63 positive epithelial cells are common - argues for sarcomatoid carcinoma and against sarcoma [93, 94]. p63 positivity in a poorly differentiated urinary bladder tumor is literally ruling out infiltration by a prostate cancer even though – considering the general likelihood of these conditions – most p63 negative cancers in the bladder are still representing urothelial carcinomas. In addition, p63 IHC is well established for facilitating the sometimes difficult and clinically highly relevant distinction of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung [22, 52] as well as ruling out invasive cancer by demonstrating a basal cell or myoepithelial cell layer in prostate, breast and salivary gland tumors [24, 67, 95]. It is of note, that in case of a p63 positive solid tumor, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma always remains a diagnostic option.

Importantly, all prevalences described in this study are specific to the reagents and the protocol used in our laboratory. The sum of data that had been earlier collected on p63 expression in cancers - summarized in Fig. 5 - would not necessarily have led to the same conclusions as drawn from this study. The use of different antibodies, protocols and interpretation criteria have jointly caused highly diverse literature data on p63 expression in cancer. It is well known, that different antibodies designed for the same target protein can vary to a large extent in their binding properties and that protocol modifications greatly impact the rate of cases considered “positive” for a certain protein [19, 96,97,98,99,100,101,102]. A further limitation of the study could be the missing evaluability of about 20% of the tumor samples. However, a statistical bias, which could potentially result from exclusion of non-interpretable samples, is highly unlikely in our study as non-interpretable samples were evenly distributed across all pathological diagnoses.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Graphical representation of p63 data from this study (x) in comparison with the previous literature. Red dots are used for studies involving < 25 cases, black dots are used for studies ≥25 cases. All studies are quoted in the list of references

Full size image

Conclusion

Strong and abundant p63 expression is seen in only few cancer types primarily including squamous and urothelial cancers as well as tumors derived from the thymus. Occasional strong p63 expression can, however, occur in a large number of other neoplasias including cancer subtypes with a propensity for focal squamous differentiation. The study also demonstrates the high value of extensive tissue validation using large-scale TMAs for determining the diagnostic utility of antibodies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DLBCL:

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

TMA:

Tissue Micro Array

p63:

Tumor Protein 63

References

  1. Fisher ML, Balinth S, Mills AA. p63-related signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(17):jcs228015.

  2. Di Como CJ, Urist MJ, Babayan I, Drobnjak M, Hedvat CV, Teruya-Feldstein J, et al. p63 expression profiles in human normal and tumor tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(2):494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gatti V, Fierro C, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Melino G, Peschiaroli A. DeltaNp63 in squamous cell carcinoma: defining the oncogenic routes affecting epigenetic landscape and tumour microenvironment. Mol Oncol. 2019;13(5):981–1001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Murray-Zmijewski F, Lane DP, Bourdon JC. p53/p63/p73 isoforms: an orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(6):962–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melino G, Lu X, Gasco M, Crook T, Knight RA. Functional regulation of p73 and p63: development and cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28(12):663–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanbokhoven H, Melino G, Candi E, Declercq W. p63, a story of mice and men. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(6):1196–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poli Neto OB, Candido dos Reis FJ, Zambelli Ramalho LN, Nogueira AA, de Andrade JM. p63 expression in epithelial ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(1):152–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufmann O, Fietze E, Mengs J, Dietel M. Value of p63 and cytokeratin 5/6 as immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(6):823–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reis-Filho JS, Simpson PT, Fulford LG, Martins A, Schmitt FC. P63-driven nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin is not a frequent event in human neoplasms. Pathol Res Pract. 2003;199(12):785–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mastropasqua MG, Maiorano E, Pruneri G, Orvieto E, Mazzarol G, Vento AR, et al. Immunoreactivity for c-kit and p63 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(10):1277–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito Y, Takeda T, Wakasa K, Tsujimoto M, Sakon M, Matsuura N. Expression of p73 and p63 proteins in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: p73 overexpression is inversely correlated with biological aggressiveness. Int J Mol Med. 2001;8(1):67–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramalho FS, Ramalho LN, Della Porta L, Zucoloto S. Comparative immunohistochemical expression of p63 in human cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(8):1276–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickson BC, Li SQ, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC, Eslami B, Werier JA, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone express p63. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(4):369–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gualco G, Weiss LM, Bacchi CE. Expression of p63 in anaplastic large cell lymphoma but not in classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(10):1505–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bir F, Aksoy Altinboga A, Satiroglu Tufan NL, Kaya S, Baser S, Yaren A. Potential utility of p63 expression in differential diagnosis of non-small-cell lung carcinoma and its effect on prognosis of the disease. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang C, Schmidt LA, Hatanaka K, Thomas D, Lagstein A, Myers JL. Evaluation of napsin A, TTF-1, p63, p40, and CK5/6 immunohistochemical stains in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142(3):320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Righi L, Graziano P, Fornari A, Rossi G, Barbareschi M, Cavazza A, et al. Immunohistochemical subtyping of nonsmall cell lung cancer not otherwise specified in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a retrospective study of 103 cases with surgical correlation. Cancer. 2011;117(15):3416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stojsic J, Jovanic I, Markovic J, Gajic M. Contribution of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinomas on small biopsy samples. J Buon. 2013;18(1):176–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Au NH, Gown AM, Cheang M, Huntsman D, Yorida E, Elliott WM, et al. P63 expression in lung carcinoma: a tissue microarray study of 408 cases. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2004;12(3):240–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamada K, Maeshima AM, Tsuta K, Tsuda H. Combined high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 34 surgically resected cases. Pathol Int. 2014;64(1):28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu M, Wang B, Gil J, Sabo E, Miller L, Gan L, et al. p63 and TTF-1 immunostaining. A useful marker panel for distinguishing small cell carcinoma of lung from poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of lung. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(5):696–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bishop JA, Teruya-Feldstein J, Westra WH, Pelosi G, Travis WD, Rekhtman N. p40 (DeltaNp63) is superior to p63 for the diagnosis of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(3):405–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baydar DE, Kulac I, Gurel B, De Marzo A. A case of prostatic adenocarcinoma with aberrant p63 expression: presentation with detailed immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis. Int J Surg Pathol. 2011;19(1):131–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bilal H, Handra-Luca A, Bertrand JC, Fouret PJ. P63 is expressed in basal and myoepithelial cells of human normal and tumor salivary gland tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51(2):133–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Genelhu MC, Gobbi H, Soares FA, Campos AH, Ribeiro CA, Cassali GD. Immunohistochemical expression of p63 in pleomorphic adenomas and carcinomas ex-pleomorphic adenomas of salivary glands. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(2):154–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Owosho AA, Aguilar CE, Seethala RR. Comparison of p63 and p40 (DeltaNp63) as basal, squamoid, and myoepithelial markers in salivary gland tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016;24(7):501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seethala RR, LiVolsi VA, Zhang PJ, Pasha TL, Baloch ZW. Comparison of p63 and p73 expression in benign and malignant salivary gland lesions. Head Neck. 2005;27(8):696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Daguci L, Stepan A, Mercut V, Daguci C, Bataiosu M, Florescu A. Immunohistochemical expression of CK7, CK5/6, CK19, and p63 in Warthin tumor. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2012;53(3):603–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vidal CI, Goldberg M, Burstein DE, Emanuel HJ, Emanuel PO. p63 immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct in distinguishing sclerosing cutaneous tumors. Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32(3):257–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kanitakis J, Chouvet B. Expression of p63 in cutaneous metastases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128(5):753–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gleason BC, Calder KB, Cibull TL, Thomas AB, Billings SD, Morgan MB, et al. Utility of p63 in the differential diagnosis of atypical fibroxanthoma and spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36(5):543–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jo VY, Fletcher CD. p63 immunohistochemical staining is limited in soft tissue tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136(5):762–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Westfall DE, Folpe AL, Paner GP, Oliva E, Goldstein L, Alsabeh R, et al. Utility of a comprehensive immunohistochemical panel in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell lesions of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):99–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Emanuel PO, Unger PD, Burstein DE. Immunohistochemical detection of p63 in testicular germ cell neoplasia. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2006;10(5):269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Su XY, Wang WY, Li JN, Liao DY, Wu WL, Li GD. Immunohistochemical differentiation between type B3 thymomas and thymic squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):5354–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim YW, Do IG, Park YK. Expression of the GLUT1 glucose transporter, p63 and p53 in thyroid carcinomas. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(11):759–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Preto A, Reis-Filho JS, Ricardo S, Soares P. P63 expression in papillary and anaplastic carcinomas of the thyroid gland: lack of an oncogenetic role in tumorigenesis and progression. Pathol Res Pract. 2002;198(7):449–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Paner GP, Annaiah C, Gulmann C, Rao P, Ro JY, Hansel DE, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of novel and traditional markers associated with urothelial differentiation in a spectrum of variants of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(7):1473–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rajcani J, Kajo K, Adamkov M, Moravekova E, Lauko L, Felcanova D, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of urothelial carcinoma. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2013;114(8):431–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Buza N, Cohen PJ, Pei H, Parkash V. Inverse p16 and p63 expression in small cell carcinoma and high-grade urothelial cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(2):94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin X, Zhu B, Villa C, Zhong M, Kundu S, Rohan SM, et al. The utility of p63, p40, and GATA-binding protein 3 immunohistochemistry in diagnosing micropapillary urothelial carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(9):1824–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grapsa D, Dokou A, Tsokanou-Kouli V, Kaltsas S, Dalakou E, Trigidou R, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, p63, c-myc, p21(WAF1/cip1) and p27(kip1) proteins in urothelial bladder carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathological parameters. J Buon. 2014;19(4):1121–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thompson S, Cioffi-Lavina M, Chapman-Fredricks J, Gomez-Fernandez C, Fernandez-Castro G, Jorda M. Distinction of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma/small cell carcinoma from conventional urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder: an immunohistochemical approach. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011;19(5):395–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang X, Boddicker RL, Dasari S, Sidhu JS, Kadin ME, Macon WR, et al. Expression of p63 protein in anaplastic large cell lymphoma: implications for genetic subtyping. Hum Pathol. 2017;64:19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo HQ, Huang GL, Liu OF, Liu YY, Yao ZH, Yao SN, et al. p63 expression is a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2012;27(3):e212–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hara T, Kijima H, Yamamoto S, Kenmochi T, Kise Y, Tanaka H, et al. Ubiquitous p63 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2004;14(2):169–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi Y, Noguchi T, Takeno S, Kimura Y, Okubo M, Kawahara K. Reduced expression of p63 has prognostic implications for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2006;15(2):323–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Borba M, Cernea C, Dias F, Faria P, Bacchi C, Brandao L, et al. Expression profile of p63 in 127 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;72(6):319–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Aubry MC, Roden A, Murphy SJ, Vasmatzis G, Johnson SH, Harris FR, et al. Chromosomal rearrangements and copy number abnormalities of TP63 correlate with p63 protein expression in lung adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(3):359–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nonaka D. A study of DeltaNp63 expression in lung non-small cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(6):895–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Whithaus K, Fukuoka J, Prihoda TJ, Jagirdar J. Evaluation of napsin A, cytokeratin 5/6, p63, and thyroid transcription factor 1 in adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136(2):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Conde E, Angulo B, Redondo P, Toldos O, Garcia-Garcia E, Suarez-Gauthier A, et al. The use of P63 immunohistochemistry for the identification of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Narahashi T, Niki T, Wang T, Goto A, Matsubara D, Funata N, et al. Cytoplasmic localization of p63 is associated with poor patient survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2006;49(4):349–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu XY, Yang GY, Yang JH, Li J. Analysis of clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis of the lung biopsy specimens in 99 adenocarcinoma cases and 111 squamous cell carcinoma cases: utility of an immunohistochemical panel containing CK5/6, CK34betaE12, p63, CK7 and TTF-1. Pathol Res Pract. 2014;210(10):680–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Montezuma D, Azevedo R, Lopes P, Vieira R, Cunha AL, Henrique R. A panel of four immunohistochemical markers (CK7, CK20, TTF-1, and p63) allows accurate diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung carcinoma on biopsy specimens. Virchows Arch. 2013;463(6):749–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hall BJ, Pincus LB, Yu SS, Oh DH, Wilson AR, McCalmont TH. Immunohistochemical prognostication of Merkel cell carcinoma: p63 expression but not polyomavirus status correlates with outcome. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39(10):911–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stetsenko GY, Malekirad J, Paulson KG, Iyer JG, Thibodeau RM, Nagase K, et al. p63 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma predicts poorer survival yet may have limited clinical utility. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140(6):838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rakha EA, Coimbra ND, Hodi Z, Juneinah E, Ellis IO, Lee AH. Immunoprofile of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology. 2017;70(6):975–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pruneri G, Fabris S, Dell’Orto P, Biasi MO, Valentini S, Del Curto B, et al. The transactivating isoforms of p63 are overexpressed in high-grade follicular lymphomas independent of the occurrence of p63 gene amplification. J Pathol. 2005;206(3):337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hedvat CV, Teruya-Feldstein J, Puig P, Capodieci P, Dudas M, Pica N, et al. Expression of p63 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2005;13(3):237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu-Monette ZY, Zhang S, Li X, Manyam GC, Wang XX, Xia Y, et al. p63 expression confers significantly better survival outcomes in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and demonstrates p53-like and p53-independent tumor suppressor function. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(2):345–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Foschini MP, Gaiba A, Cocchi R, Pennesi MG, Gatto MR, Frezza GP, et al. Pattern of p63 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Virchows Arch. 2004;444(4):332–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Moergel M, Abt E, Stockinger M, Kunkel M. Overexpression of p63 is associated with radiation resistance and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(9):667–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lo Muzio L, Santarelli A, Caltabiano R, Rubini C, Pieramici T, Trevisiol L, et al. p63 overexpression associates with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2005;36(2):187–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Saghravanian N, Anvari K, Ghazi N, Memar B, Shahsavari M, Aghaee MA. Expression of p63 and CD44 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;82:160–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ud Din N, Qureshi A, Mansoor S. Utility of p63 immunohistochemical stain in differentiating urothelial carcinomas from adenocarcinomas of prostate. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54(1):59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Uchida K, Ross H, Lotan T, Pignon JC, Signoretti S, Epstein JI, et al. DeltaNp63 (p40) expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma with diffuse p63 positivity. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(3):384–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Parsons JK, Gage WR, Nelson WG, De Marzo AM. p63 protein expression is rare in prostate adenocarcinoma: implications for cancer diagnosis and carcinogenesis. Urology. 2001;58(4):619–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tuna B, Unlu M, Aslan G, Secil M, Yorukoglu K. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of p63 immunoreactivity in renal malignancies. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2009;31(2):118–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Langner C, Ratschek M, Tsybrovskyy O, Schips L, Zigeuner R. P63 immunoreactivity distinguishes upper urinary tract transitional-cell carcinoma and renal-cell carcinoma even in poorly differentiated tumors. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51(8):1097–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rooper L, Sharma R, Bishop JA. Polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma has a consistent p63+/p40- immunophenotype that helps distinguish it from adenoid cystic carcinoma and cellular pleomorphic adenoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2015;9(1):79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Valencia-Guerrero A, Dresser K, Cornejo KM. Utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing primary adnexal carcinoma from metastatic breast carcinoma to skin and squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2018;40(6):389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dotto J, Pelosi G, Rosai J. Expression of p63 in thymomas and normal thymus. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;127(3):415–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Vrabie CD, Terzea D, Petrescu A, Waller M. The histopathology analysis of the diffuse sclerosing variant of the papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a distinctive and rare form. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50(4):743–8.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Necchi A, Giannatempo P, Paolini B, Lo Vullo S, Marongiu M, Fare E, et al. Immunohistochemistry to enhance prognostic allocation and guide decision-making of patients with advanced urothelial cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13(2):171–7 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Koyuncuer A. Immunohistochemical expression of p63, p53 in urinary bladder carcinoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013;56(1):10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Carneiro FP, Ramalho LN, Britto-Garcia S, Ribeiro-Silva A, Zucoloto S. Immunohistochemical expression of p16, p53, and p63 in colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):588–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang N, Huo Q, Wang X, Chen X, Long L, Guan X, et al. A genetic variant in p63 (rs17506395) is associated with breast cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Gene. 2014;535(2):170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Reis-Filho JS, Simpson PT, Martins A, Preto A, Gartner F, Schmitt FC. Distribution of p63, cytokeratins 5/6 and cytokeratin 14 in 51 normal and 400 neoplastic human tissue samples using TARP-4 multi-tumor tissue microarray. Virchows Arch. 2003;443(2):122–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fraune C, Simon R, Hube-Magg C, Makrypidi-Fraune G, Kahler C, Kluth M, et al. MMR deficiency in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder presents with temporal and spatial homogeneity throughout the tumor mass. Urol Oncol. 2020;38(5):488–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Park CK, Oh YH. Expression of p63 in reactive hyperplasias and malignant lymphomas. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20(5):752–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fukushima N, Satoh T, Sueoka N, Sato A, Ide M, Hisatomi T, et al. Clinico-pathological characteristics of p63 expression in B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2006;97(10):1050–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Robson A, Shukur Z, Ally M, Kluk J, Liu K, Pincus L, et al. Immunocytochemical p63 expression discriminates between primary cutaneous follicle centre cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma-leg type, and is of the TAp63 isoform. Histopathology. 2016;69(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hallack Neto AE, Siqueira SA, Dulley FL, Ruiz MA, Chamone DA, Pereira J. p63 protein expression in high risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(1):77–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Liang R, Chan WP, Kwong YL, Xu WS, Srivastava G, Ho FC. High incidence of BCL-6 gene rearrangement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of primary gastric origin. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;97(2):114–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Skinnider BF, Horsman DE, Dupuis B, Gascoyne RD. Bcl-6 and Bcl-2 protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: correlation with 3q27 and 18q21 chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(7):803–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Yang A, Kaghad M, Wang Y, Gillett E, Fleming MD, Dotsch V, et al. p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27-29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol Cell. 1998;2(3):305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Dalla-Favera R, Ye BH, Lo Coco F, Chang CC, Cechova K, Zhang J, et al. BCL-6 and the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell lymphoma. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1994;59:117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Liu Y, Nekulova M, Nenutil R, Horakova I, Appleyard MV, Murray K, et al. Np63/p40 correlates with the location and phenotype of basal/mesenchymal cancer stem-like cells in human ER(+) and HER2(+) breast cancers. J Pathol Clin Res. 2020;6(1):83–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Timofeeva OA, Palechor-Ceron N, Li G, Yuan H, Krawczyk E, Zhong X, et al. Conditionally reprogrammed normal and primary tumor prostate epithelial cells: a novel patient-derived cell model for studies of human prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):22741–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Pignon JC, Grisanzio C, Geng Y, Song J, Shivdasani RA, Signoretti S. p63-expressing cells are the stem cells of developing prostate, bladder, and colorectal epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(20):8105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Akce M, Jiang R, Alese OB, Shaib WL, Wu C, Behera M, et al. Gastric squamous cell carcinoma and gastric adenosquamous carcinoma, clinical features and outcomes of rare clinical entities: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(1):85–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Truong LD, Shen SS. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(1):92–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Reis-Filho JS, Schmitt FC. p63 expression in sarcomatoid/metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology. 2003;42(1):94–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Stefanou D, Batistatou A, Nonni A, Arkoumani E, Agnantis NJ. p63 expression in benign and malignant breast lesions. Histol Histopathol. 2004;19(2):465–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Acs G, Acs P, Beckwith SM, Pitts RL, Clements E, Wong K, et al. Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(9):3561–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Andersson S, Sundberg M, Pristovsek N, Ibrahim A, Jonsson P, Katona B, et al. Corrigendum: insufficient antibody validation challenges oestrogen receptor beta research. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Elliott S, Swift S, Busse L, Scully S, Van G, Rossi J, et al. Epo receptors are not detectable in primary human tumor tissue samples. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Laflamme C, McKeever PM, Kumar R, Schwartz J, Kolahdouzan M, Chen CX, et al. Implementation of an antibody characterization procedure and application to the major ALS/FTD disease gene C9ORF72. Elife. 2019;8:e48363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Sinclair AM, Todd MD, Forsythe K, Knox SJ, Elliott S, Begley CG. Expression and function of erythropoietin receptors in tumors: implications for the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110(3):477–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Trincavelli ML, Da Pozzo E, Ciampi O, Cuboni S, Daniele S, Abbracchio MP, et al. Regulation of erythropoietin receptor activity in endothelial cells by different erythropoietin (EPO) derivatives: an in vitro study. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(2):2258–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Saper CB. A guide to the perplexed on the specificity of antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem. 2009;57(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Melanie Witt, Inge Brandt, Sünje Seekamp, and Maren Eisenberg for excellent technical support.

Funding

Not applicable. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Stefan Steurer, Claudia Riemann, Franziska Büscheck, Andreas M. Luebke, Martina Kluth, Claudia Hube-Magg, Andrea Hinsch, Doris Höflmayer, Sören Weidemann, Christoph Fraune, Katharina Möller, Anne Menz, Christian Bernreuther, Patrick Lebok, Till S. Clauditz, Guido Sauter, Ria Uhlig, Waldemar Wilczak, David Dum, Ronald Simon, Sarah Minner, Eike Burandt, Till Krech & Andreas H. Marx

  2. Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Margit Fisch, Michael Rink & Rainer Krech

  3. Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany

    Till Krech

  4. Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany

    Andreas H. Marx

Authors
  1. Stefan Steurer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Riemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franziska Büscheck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas M. Luebke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martina Kluth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claudia Hube-Magg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrea Hinsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Doris Höflmayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sören Weidemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christoph Fraune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Katharina Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Anne Menz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Margit Fisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Michael Rink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Christian Bernreuther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Patrick Lebok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Till S. Clauditz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Guido Sauter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Ria Uhlig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Waldemar Wilczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. David Dum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Ronald Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Sarah Minner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Eike Burandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Rainer Krech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Till Krech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Andreas H. Marx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS, AHM, RS, and GS designed the study. SS, FB, CR, AML, AH, DH, SW, CF, KM, AM, CB, PL, TSC, RU, WW, DD, SM, EB, RK, and TK performed the immunohistochemical analyses and/or contributed to the pathological validation of the tumors, the tissue microarray construction, and data collection. MF and MR contributed to data collection. MK, CHM, and RS carried out the data analyses. GS, RS, AHM, SS and MK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper, gave final approval of the version to the published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Simon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of remnants of archived diagnostic tissues for manufacturing of TMAs and their analysis for research purposes as well as patient data analysis has been approved by local laws (HmbKHG, §12) and by the local ethics committee (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF-049/09). All work has been carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

RS developed the antibody 7B4.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40364_2021_260_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steurer, S., Riemann, C., Büscheck, F. et al. p63 expression in human tumors and normal tissues: a tissue microarray study on 10,200 tumors. Biomark Res 9, 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00260-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00260-5

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us