Review
Open Access

Beyond malignancy: the role of carbohydrate antigen 125 in heart failure

Biomarker Research20131:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7771-1-25

©  Hung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 11 July 2013

Accepted: 19 August 2013

Published: 30 August 2013

Abstract

Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125), traditionally a tumor marker for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring in ovarian malignancy, had recently been shown increasing evidence and more extensively recognized/explored as a novel surrogate of heart failure (HF). The exact mechanisms underlying the pathophysiologic link between elevated serum CA-125 concentration and HF may be multi-factorial, with both mechanical and inflammatory process including numerous potential cytokines involved. Accumulating data had consistently indicated its diagnostic and prognostic role in HF patients in various clinical settings, however, there is limited clinical information regarding the incremental value or head-to-head comparison of such marker to other well-established HF markers. In this brief review, we aimed to discuss the biosynthesis, and potential insights of underlying pathophysiologies associated with CA-125 secretion in the scenarios of cardiac structural/functional alterations and HF, and further explored its current usage and roles in several recent reports.

Brief introduction

Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125), also known as MUC16, is a glycoprotein belonging to the mucin (MUC) family [1]. Humans CA-125, encoded by MUC16 gene, contains about 22,000 amino acids and is heavily glycosylated at the extracellular region (Figure 1), which can be released from the cell surface by undergoing proteolytic cleavage and hence released into body fluid, including blood, pleural effusion, and ascites. CA-125 was first detected in ovarian cancer cell line. Subsequent studies showed that it is normally expressed on the surface of cells derived from coelomic epithelium, including pleura, epicardium, fallopian tubes, endometrium, and endocervix. With rich oligosaccharide chains, the physiological role of CA-125 is considered to protect the epithelial luminal surfaces from physical stress through hydration or lubrication process [2, 3].
Figure 1

The Mucin family glycoproteins. (A) There are two classes of mucins generated in the cells: secreted mucins and membrane associated mucins. (B) Diagram of the structure of CA-125. CA-125 is encoded by the MUC16 gene which is located on human chromosome 19. CA-125 contains a tandem repeat domain that has repeating sequences high in serine, threonine and proline and is highly O-glycosylated. The C-terminal domain of CA-125 contains multiple extracellular SEA (s ea urchin sperm protein, e nterokinase, and a grin) modules, a transmembrane (TM) domain, and a cytoplasmic tail. CA-125 is also thought to be putatively cleaved at a site in the SEA modules.

The role of CA-125 in malignancy and non-cardiac pathophysiology

Clinically CA-125 has long been used as a marker for ovarian cancer [4–6]. In patients with ovarian cancer, accumulated evidence showed that serum levels of CA-125 is helpful in the monitoring of the cancer and further aid in risk stratification and prognosis after treatment [7, 8]. However, a rise of serum CA-125 level is not limited to ovarian cancer alone. Other gynaecological malignancies or non-gynaecological malignancies including lung cancer, mediastinal teratoma, and even non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, have been reported to be associated with a high serum CA-125 level [9–11]. Apart from malignancies, elevation of CA-125 can been seen in situations involving several physiologic or pathologic conditions including early pregnancy, menstruation, peritoneal trauma, and ascites of any cause [12, 13]. Hepatic cirrhosis as a cause of CA-125 elevation, for example, had been mentioned to be the most frequent diagnosis in male patients7. Another example is that elevation of CA-125 may happen in subjects with pleural effusion [14]. Based on these findings, clinical interpretation of elevated CA-125 should be exercised with caution, in part may be due to its restriction in specificity of diagnosing a single clinical disease entity or scenario.

The link between CA-125, left-sided cardiac structural/functional alterations and heart failure

Since CA-125 is expressed in epicardium, it is not surprising that cardiac disorders may be associated with elevated CA-125 levels in the blood. Nagele and associates firstly reported the findings of clinical or hemodynamical relevance of several tumor markers, with a special focus on CA-125, in patients with chronic heart failure before and after heart transplantation [15]. Duman et al. ever described a weak association between CA-125 level and right side pulmonary artery pressure, though in that case no association was found between CA-125 level and left-side cardiac hemodynamic (mostly diastolic) parameters [16]. Similar finding was reported by Kouris et al. [17]. What may merit noteworthy is that, Duman et al. also showed that CA-125 was associated with left atrial volume as a supplement to the severity indices of diastolic dysfunction along with BNP levels [16]. In our recent work, we demonstrated that in subjects with HF but preserved LVEF (HFpEF), CA-125 was actually associated with LA remodeling in terms of higher volume rather than other parameters, which may highlight that clinical significance or findings that diastolic impairment or left sided hemodynamic disturbances linked to CA-125 may actually come from left atrial remodeling [18]. On the contrary, D'Aloia et al. demonstrated an association between CA-125 level and both right heart hemodynamics and left ventricular diastolic function [19]. Compared to the former study, data reported by D'Aloia et al. had larger total patient population across a wide range of HF severity in terms of NYHA functional class (Fc) (Duman et al.: 49, Kouris et al.: 77 versus D'Aloia et al.: 286) leading to larger amount of Fc IV population (Duman et al.: 16, Kouris et al.: 16 versus D'Aloia et al.: 83) in D'Aloia's series, and potentially higher number of subjects (28/49 versus 152/286) having CA-125 above normal range (35 U/ml). Differences in total patient numbers, disease severity and distributions may in part explain the potential differences in such correlations. In the same study, D'Aloia also reported that subsequently lower CA-125 at follow up was related to clinical improvement by NYHA class as a positive response to therapy. Again, another study by Vizzardi et al. with larger patient number enrolled and wider range of clinical HF subjects (n = 200, NYHA Fc II-IV) reported that both systolic and diastolic indices, cardiac diameter, and diastolic functional parameters correlated with CA125 level [20]. In one study, CA-125 distinguished subjects with acute decompensated HF [21], and further showed prognostic significance (Table 1). The predictive value for all-cause mortality up to 6-months after index HF hospitalization had also been demonstrated by the same study group [22]. On the other hand, there also seems to be a moderate correlation between CA-125 and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, the most commonly used biomarker reflecting degree of excessive ventricular wall stress, hemodynamics or ventricular filling abnormalities in left-sided HF [23, 24]. Interestingly, though both markers had been reported to rise in acute heart failure, combination of them in clinical use may further improve risk stratification at follow up [23, 25]. Nevertheless, the elevation of CA-125 in the context of left-sided HF had been proposed to be associated with disease severity in terms of NYHA functional class, [20, 22] echocardiographic parameters, and clinical conditions such as effusions or edema [13, 23].
Table 1

Comparisons of previous CA-125 related heart failure research and reports from previous studies

 

Subjects number

HF presentations

Clinical status

Left side hemodynamics

Outcomes available

Kouris et al. [17]

N = 77

AHF

V

V

?

Nunez et al. [21]

N = 1,111

AHF

V

?

V

Nägele et al. [15]

N = 71

CHF

V

?

V

D’Aloia et al. [19]

N = 286

CHF

V

—

V

Vizzardi et al. [20]

N = 200

CHF

V

V

?

Duman et al. [16]

N = 49

CHF

V

V

?

Chen [24]

N = 285

CHF

V

V

?

Yilmaz et al. [28]

N = 150

All comers

?

V

V

Hung et al. [18]

N = 35

HFpEF

X

V

V

V, Positive Finding, —, Negative Finding, ?, Not Reported.

The clinical associations between CA-125 and right-sided heart failure

Significant elevation of CA125 level in a patient having atrial septal defect (ASD) with right ventricular dilatation was ever reported by Mathew et al. [26]. The association between CA125 and right ventricular parameters, either structural or functional, in subjects presented as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) had also been described [27, 28]. In Yilmaz’s work, 40 patients with another age- and gender-matched control group with detailed transthoracic echocardiography were examined [28]. They observed that patients with higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure as well as lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion or worse tricuspid annulus systolic velocity (S’) all had significantly higher CA-125 levels than did those without. In another retrospective work (totally 150 patients enrolled) by Yilmaz et all reported that elevated CA-125 level was associated with worse left ventricular ejection fraction and positively correlated with systolic pulmonary artery pressure [29]. In particular, patients with right ventricular dilatation had significantly higher CA-125 levels compared to those without. They also concluded that patients with high CA-125 level encountered more frequent hospitalization, atrial fibrillation and mortality at future follow up. This work actually pointed out the potential link between bi-ventricular failure and elevated CA-125 level was not confined to only right or left ventricle alone.

Possible mechanisms linking elevated CA-125 to clinical heart failure

Interpretation of elevated CA-125 levels in HF should consider the triggering factors as well as the production sites. These issues have been investigated and no simple answer was found. So far, production of CA-125 in subjects with HF had been hypothesized to happen with so-called “stressed” mesothelial cells, in response to both hemodynamic and inflammation stimuli [30]. It had been proposed that fluid overload accompanied by high venous pressure due to heart failure may increase the congestion and hydrostatic pressure in mesothelium, [31] which may actually provoke the release of several inflammatory markers such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factors. In this regard, serosal irritation due to inflammation process, mechanical stress, or fluid congestion all might stimulate mesothelial cells to initiate CA-125 synthesis [32, 33]. The synthetic capacity of mesothelium of CA-125 had been demonstrated by Zeillemaker et al., who investigated the secretion pattern of CA-125 using mesothelial cell monolayer as an in vitro model [34] by utilizing several inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor-α and lipopolysaccharides as stimuli. Apical secretion of CA-125 was shown in 6 hours, with the most effective stimuli observed to be IL-1. Congestion as a hallmark of clinical HF manifestation may involve pulmonary congestion/edema, pleural effusion and ascites, which are believed to be interrelated with systemic inflammation activation as a vicious cycle [35]. The formation of congestion itself as a consequence of HF had made the splanchnic bed with an abundance of mesothelial cells exposed to high-venous pressure and ascitis (Figure 2). Furthermore, the combination of both pathological process may thus further contribute to neurohumoral-axis activation facilitating CA-125 production [36]. Additionally, the possible translocation of bacteria or endotoxin formation during the exacerbation of HF, a condition most likely to happen in subjects presenting with right heart failure as well as gastrointestinal functional impairment in the context of bowel congestion with HF, may also play a key role in the “hyper-response” of CA-125 from mesothelium [37].
Figure 2

Illustrations regarding how HF may cause elevated hydrostatic pressure and congestion, leading to both serosal mechanical stretch and third space fluid retention with resultant inflammation and cytokines release. These complex chain reactions were believed to be the main cause of systemic CA-125 release.

On the other hand, the hypothetical link between pericardial stimuli and elevation of CA-125 in subjects with HF had also been observed. Seo et al. [38] ever reported a 59% positive staining in the pericardial mesothelial cells, while Soma et al. reported a negative finding [39]. More or less, accumulating evidence had indicated the mesothelium (pericardial, pleura or peritoneum) as a potential primary source of CA-125 in HF or other non-malignant clinical scenarios [40, 41], while data regarding the severity or extent of underlying stimuli, inducing media or modalities, and whether such elevation in HF was also secondarily influenced by effusions per se or other associated cytokines still remained a debate [41]. Perhaps, all these possibilities exist, but just contribute differentially according to the severity and etiologies of HF. To clarify these issues, experiments studying animal models of HF mimicking different presentations of human HF encountered clinically may provide the solution. This approach will determine the major production sites of CA-125 as well as the major stimuli in various stages of HF.

Potential clinical application of CA-125 in HF

The range of value and potential clinical implication of CA-125 regarding its predictive value in monitoring HF beyond and the correlates with other well-established HF markers (e.g. BNP or NT-ProBNP) remained largely unknown. In general, serum CA-125 level seemed to be 7-fold higher (HF: 105.2 ± 139, range 4.6 to 1169.5 U/ml vs Control: 14.9 ± 22 U/ml, respectively) in subjects with acute HF, 2.5 times in chronic HF (HF: 68 ± 83, range 3 to 537 U/ml) [23] and nearly 1.5 times higher in female HFpEF (HFpEF: 17.6 ± 10.2, range 4.94 to 104.3 U/ml) [18], the value actually had wide range across a heterogeneous spectrum in specific subgroups of HF patients [12, 26, 29, 32, 39]. Previous work on healthy volunteers showed that serum CA-125 level differences may exist between healthy pre- (mean level: 12.6 U/ml) and post-menopausal women (10.5 U/ml) though without statistical significance, with significant lower value was observed in healthy men when compared to pre-menopausal women (9.2 vs 12.6 U/ml, p = 0.007) [42]. Serum CA-125 had shown significant correlation with BNP level, elevated LV end-diastolic filling pressure and larger LA volume in systolic HF [16], so far there is a paucity of data on the incremental value of CA 125 when added on BNP. Though comparable long-term (14 ± 2 months) predictive value for CA 125 when compared to NT-ProBNP in stable, chronic systolic HF had recently been tested in a feasibility study with much lower cost (about 10 times less expensive for CA 125 vs NT-ProBNP, roughly U.S. $1.07 vs $10.74) [43]. The lack of change in serum CA 125 concentration rather than NT-ProBNP seemed to confer higher risk of death in systolic HF during a 3-month therapeutic interval. [44] In addition to the potential clinical application in patients with systolic heart failure, CA125 may help to clarify the uncertain management of patients with HFpEF [45]. The incremental value of CA 125 superimposed on NT-ProBNP in female HFpEF was proved in our work recently [18]. Interestingly, all these studies showed statistically significant association between NT-ProBNP and CA-125 level. However, all these reports were of smaller sample size and used a diversity of clinical outcomes as end-points. Thereafter, a large scale study with specific HF patients population and well-defined clinical outcomes may be necessary for a head-to-head comparison between CA-125 and other commonly used HF biomarkers.

Conclusion

With better understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms and pathophysiological processes of heart failure in the recent era, biomarker as a surrogate in disease screening, diagnosis, or as a guide to effects of therapy or outcomes had broadened the utilization of these tools by physicians in clinical settings. The incremental clinical value by using multi-biomarker panel looking into potentially diverse pathways or biological signaling involved in a clinical disease entity are evolving. CA-125, the glycoprotein primarily used for ovarian cancer screening or therapeutic monitoring, is gaining more and more attention as another role in heart failure. Insights into the understanding of its role and mechanisms involved in heart failure had made it different from other biomarkers for the same purpose, though questions and issues regarding the real determinants for such glycoprotein release, short- and long-term monitoring for treatment, and the potential costs as a routine marker for heart failure may worth further investigation.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Internal Medicine and Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital
(2)
The Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University
(3)
Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College
(4)
Department of Health Industry Management, Kainan University
(5)
Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management

References

  1. Yin BWT: Molecular cloning of the CA125 ovarian cancer antigen. identification as a new mucin, muc16. J Biol Chem 2001,276(29):27371–27375.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bafna S, Kaur S, Batra SK: Membrane-bound mucins: the mechanistic basis for alterations in the growth and survival of cancer cells. Oncogene 2010, 29: 2893–2904.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaetje R, Winnekendonk DW, Ahr A, Kaufmann M: Ovarian cancer antigen CA-125 influences adhesion of human and mammalian cell lines in vitro. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2002,29(1):34–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bischof P: What do we know about the origin of CA-125? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993, 49: 93–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bast RC Jr, Xu FJ, Yu YH, Barnhill S, Zhang Z, Mills GB: CA-125: the past and the future. Int J Biol Markers 1998, 13: 179–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Whitehouse C, Solomon E: Current status of the molecular characterization of the ovarian cancer antigen CA125 and implications for its use in clinical screening. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 88: S152-S157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Halila H, Stenman UH, Seppala M: Ovarian cancer antigen CA-125 levels in pelvic inflammatory disease and pregnancy. Cancer 1986, 57: 1327–1329.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbieri RL, Niloff JM, Bast RC Jr, Scaetzl E, Kistner RW, Knapp RC: Elevated serum concentrations of CA-125 in patients with advanced endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1986, 45: 630–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Molina R, Filella X, Jo J, et al.: CA-125 in biological fluids. Int J Biol Markers 1998, 13: 224–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindgren J, Kuusela P, Hellström PE, Pettersson T, Klockars M: The ovarian cancer associated antigen CA-125 in patients with pleural effusions. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988, 24: 737–739.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yilmaz MB, Nikolaou M, Cohen SA: Tumour biomarkers in heart failure: is there a role for CA-125? Eur J Heart Fail 2011, 13: 579–583.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Epiney M, Bertossa C, Weil A, Campana A, Bischof P: CA125 production by the peritoneum: in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Hum Reprod 2000, 15: 1261–1265.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zuckerman E, Lanir A, Sabo E, et al.: Cancer antigen 125: a sensitive marker of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94: 1613–1618.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mezger J, Wilmanns W, Lamerz R: Elevated serum CA-125 levels in patients with benign ascitic or pleural effusions. Tumour Biol 1988, 9: 47–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nägele H, Bahlo M, Klapdor R, Schaeperkoetter D, Rödiger W: CA-125 and its relation to cardiac function. Am Heart J 1999, 137: 1044–1049.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Duman D, Palit F, Simsek E, Bilgehan K: Serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels in advanced heart failure: relation to B-type natriuretic peptide and left atrial volume. Eur J Heart Fail 2008, 10: 556–559.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kouris NT, Zacharos ID, Kontogianni DD, Goranitou GS, Sifaki MD, Grassos HE, Kalkandi EM, Babalis DK: The significance of CA125 levels in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Correlation with clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Eur J Heart Fail 2005, 7: 199–203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hung CL, Hung TC, Liu CC, Wu YJ, Kuo JY, Hou CJ, Yeh HI: Relation of carbohydrate antigen-125 to left atrial remodeling and its prognostic usefulness in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in women. Am J Cardiol 2012, 110: 993–1000.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Aloia A, Faggiano P, Aurigemma G, Bontempi L, Ruggeri G, Metra M, Nodari S, Dei CL: Serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 in patients with chronic heart failure: relation to clinical severity, hemodynamic and doppler echocardiographic abnormalities, and short-term prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41: 1805–1811.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Vizzardi E, Nodari S, D’Aloia A, Chiari E, Faggiano P, Metra M, Dei CL: CA-125 tumoral marker plasma levels relate to systolic and diastolic ventricular function and to the clinical status of patients with chronic heart failure. Echocardiography 2008, 25: 955–960.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nunez J, Sanchis J, Bodi V, et al.: Improvement in risk stratification with the combination of the tumour marker antigen carbohydrate 125 and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute heart failure. Eur Heart J 2010, 31: 1752–1763.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Núñez J, Núñez E, Consuegra L, Sanchis J, Bodí V, Martínez-Brotons A, Bertomeu-González V, Robles R, Bosch MJ, Fácila L, Darmofal H, Llàcer A: Carbohydrate antigen 125: an emerging prognostic risk factor in acute heart failure? Heart 2007, 93: 716–721.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Faggiano P, D’Aloia A, Brentana L, Bignotti T, Fiorina C, Vizzardi E, Dei CL: Serum levels of different tumour markers in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005, 7: 57–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen YX, Wang XQ, Fang CF, Wang JF, Tang LJ: Value of BNP and tumour marker CA125 in patients with heart failure. Acta Cardiol 2008, 63: 501–506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Núñez J, Núñez E, Sanchis J, Bodí V, Fonarow GC, Miñana G, Palau P, Bertomeu-González V, Carratalá A, Mainar L, Chorro FJ, Llàcer A: Antigen carbohydrate 125 and brain natriuretic peptide serial measurements for risk stratification following an episode of acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2012, 159: 21–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mathew B, Bhatia V, Mahy IR, Ahmed I, Francis L: Elevation of the tumor marker CA125 in right heart failure. South Med J 2004,97(10):1013–1014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Uz O, Kardesoglu E, Tas D, Acar G, Isilak Z, Yiginer O, Aparci M, Cingozbay BY, Cebeci BS: CA-125 level is associated with right ventricular echocardiographic parameters in patients with COPD. South Med J 2011, 104: 624–628.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yilmaz MB, Zorlu A, Dogan OT, Karahan O, Tandogan I, Akkurt I: Role of CA-125 in identification of right ventricular failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Cardiol 2011, 34: 244–248.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yilmaz MB, Zorlu A, Tandogan I: Plasma CA-125 level is related to both sides of the heart: a retrospective analysis. Int J Cardiol 2011, 149: 80–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zeimet AG, Offner FA, Marth C, Heim K, Feichtinger H, Daxenbichler G, Dapunt O: Modulation of CA-125 release by inflammatory cytokines in human peritoneal mesothelial and ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res 1997, 17: 3129–3131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kosar F, Aksoy Y, Ozguntekin G, Ozerol I, Varol E: Relationship between cytokines and tumour markers in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2006,8(3):270–274.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Turgut O, Tandogan I, Yilmaz MB, Gul I, Gurlek A: CA125 levels among patients with advanced heart failure: an emerging independent predictor for survival. Int J Cardiol 2010, 145: 71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang F, Chen J, Liu Y, Zhang K, Wang J, Huang H: New mechanism of elevated CA125 in heart failure: the mechanical stress and inflammatory stimuli initiate CA125 synthesis. Med Hypotheses 2012, 79: 381–383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeillemaker AM, Verbrugh HA: Hoynck van Papendrecht AA, Leguit P. CA-125 secretion by peritoneal mesothelial cells. J Clin Pathol 1994, 47: 263–265.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Minana G, Nunez J, Sanchis J, Bodi V, Nunez E, Llacer A: CA125 and immunoinflammatory activity in acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2010, 145: 547–548.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P, Barsuk JH, Blair JE, Cleland JG, Dickstein K, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Jaarsma T, Jondeau G, Sendon JL, Mebazaa A, Metra M, Nieminen M, Pang PS, Seferovic P, Stevenson LW, van Veldhuisen DJ, Zannad F, Anker SD, Rhodes A, McMurray JJ, Filippatos G: European society of cardiology; European society of intensive care medicine. assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology and endorsed by the European society of intensive care medicine. Eur J Heart Fail 2010, 12: 423–433.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Krack A, Sharma R, Figulla HR, Anker SD: The importance of the gastrointestinal system in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Eur Heart J 2005, 26: 2368–2374.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Seo T, Ikeda Y, Onaka H, et al.: Usefulness of serum CA125 measurement for monitoring pericardial effusion. Jpn Circ J 1993, 57: 489–494.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Soma L, Allen M, Tobin L, et al.: CA-125 concentrations in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. Clin Chem 2002, 48: 2289–2290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Colombo PC, Ganda A, Lin J, Onat D, Harxhi A, Iyasere JE: Inflammatory activation: cardiac, renal, and cardio-renal interactions in patients with the cardiorenal syndrome. Heart Fail Rev 2012, 17: 177–190.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Topatan B, Basaran A: CA-125 and heart failure: déjà vu or "still to be seen". Int J Cardiol 2010, 145: 626–629.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Zustovich F, Buja A, Da Prà M, Farina G, Zovato S, Buttarello M, Perissinotto E, Cartei G: CA-125 behaviour by gender and potential prognostic role in early stage lung cancer. Cancer Therapy 2007, 5: 347–350.Google Scholar
  43. Ordu S, Ozhan H, Alemdar R, Aydin M, Caglar O, Yuksel H, Kandis H: Carbohydrate Antigen-125 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels: compared in heart-failure prognostication. Tex Heart Inst J 2012, 39: 30–35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Folga A, Filipiak KJ, Mamcarz A, Obrebska-Tabaczka E, Opolski G: Simultaneous predictive value of NT-proBNP and CA-125 in patients newly diagnosed with advanced heart failure: preliminary results. Arch Med Sci 2012, 8: 637–643.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Chung-Lieh H, Charles Jia-Yin H, Gwo-Chi H, Jen-Yuan K, Chia-Yu H, Cheng-Ho T, Hung-I Y, Bulwer BE, Ya-Ching H: Myths and facts about heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: risk factors, longevity, potential pharmacological and exercise interventions. Int J Gerontol 2013, 7: 1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement