Skip to main content

Global research hotspots, development trends and prospect discoveries of phase separation in cancer: a decade-long informatics investigation

Abstract

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a complex and subtle phenomenon whose formation and regulation take essential roles in cancer initiation, growth, progression, invasion, and metastasis. This domain holds a wealth of underutilized unstructured data that needs further excavation for potentially valuable information. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the global scientific knowledge in the field over the last decade by using informatics methods (such as hierarchical clustering, regression statistics, hotspot burst, and Walktrap algorithm analysis). Over the past decade, this area enjoyed a favorable development trend (Annual Growth Rate: 34.98%) and global collaboration (International Co-authorship: 27.31%). Through unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on machine learning, the global research hotspots were divided into five dominant research clusters: Cluster 1 (Effects and Mechanisms of Phase Separation in Drug Delivery), Cluster 2 (Phase Separation in Gene Expression Regulation), Cluster 3 (Phase Separation in RNA-Protein Interaction), Cluster 4 (Reference Value of Phase Separation in Neurodegenerative Diseases for Cancer Research), and Cluster 5 (Roles and Mechanisms of Phase Separation). And further time-series analysis revealed that Cluster 5 is the emerging research cluster. In addition, results from the regression curve and hotspot burst analysis point in unison to super-enhancer (a=0.5515, R2=0.6586, p=0.0044) and stress granule (a=0.8000, R2=0.6000, p=0.0085) as the most potential star molecule in this field. More interestingly, the Random-Walk-Strategy-based Walktrap algorithm further revealed that “phase separation, cancer, transcription, super-enhancer, epigenetics”(Relevance Percentage[RP]=100%, Development Percentage[DP]=29.2%), “stress granule, immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, RNA binding protein”(RP=79.2%, DP=33.3%) and “nanoparticle, apoptosis”(RP=70.8%, DP=25.0%) are closely associated with this field, but are still under-developed and worthy of further exploration. In conclusion, this study profiled the global scientific landscape, discovered a crucial emerging research cluster, identified several pivotal research molecules, and predicted several crucial but still under-developed directions that deserve further research, providing an important reference value for subsequent basic and clinical research of phase separation in cancer.

To the editor,

Complex biochemical reactions and substance metabolism exist within cancer cells, which may lead to uneven distribution of intracellular substances and the formation of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of different substances, that is, intracellular LLPS phenomenon. Such a LLPS could ultimately affect cancer proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, metastasis, and treatment sensitivity by influencing cell signaling, gene expression modulation, energy metabolism variation, and other mechanisms [1,2,3,4].

With decades of endeavors by oncology biologists and physicists, this field has amassed a wealth of unstructured data and continues to inflate exponentially, rendering it problematic for researchers to make sense of the intrinsic connections and evolutions of this information in a short period. Therefore, utilizing the informatics method, including hierarchical clustering, regression statistics, hotspot burst, and Walktrap algorithm analysis (Additional file 1) [5,6,7,8,9,10], we retrospectively analyzed the scientific knowledge in this field over the past decade, revealed the global research hotspots (GRHs) and development trends, and further identified the critical issues and directions worthy of in-depth exploration.

Results

After excluding non-peer-reviewed or non-English articles, extensive relevant studies (n = 1073, Additional file 2) from January 1, 2014, to December 30, 2023, were quantified, hierarchically clustered, time-series analyzed, regression analyzed, hotspot burst analyzed, and research prospect forecasted.

Over the past decade, this area enjoyed a favorable development trend (Annual Growth Rate: 34.98%) and global collaboration (International Co-authorship: 27.31%) (Additional file 3). Through unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on machine learning, the GRHs were divided into five dominant research clusters: Cluster1 (Effects and Mechanisms of LLPS in Drug Delivery), Cluster2 (LLPS in Gene Expression Regulation), Cluster3 (LLPS in RNA-Protein Interaction), Cluster4 (Reference Value of LLPS in Neurodegenerative Diseases for Cancer Research), and Cluster5 (Roles and Mechanisms of LLPS). After removing the search terms, the in-vitro (Occurrence Frequency[OF] = 50, Total Link Strength[TLS] = 344), transcription (OF = 68, TLS = 522), domains (OF = 45, TLS = 338), stress granules (OF = 69, TLS = 616), and activation (OF = 57, TLS = 374) are the core nodes of Clusters 1–5, respectively (Fig. 1A, Additional file 4, 5). Further time-series analysis revealed that among these five clusters, Cluster 5 (Average Publication Year = 2021.50 ± 0.70) is the emerging research cluster (Fig. 1B). Spatial density networks based on TLS or OF further provide an intuitive visualization overview of GRHs (Fig. 1C, D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Spatial and temporal distribution of global research hotspots on phase separation in the field of oncology.

A Unsupervised learning hierarchical clustering for global research hotspots. The same colored nodes represent the same cluster. The size of the node indicates the total linkage strength. B Time series analysis of global research hotspots. A darker purple indicates a smaller average publication year, while a darker yellow indicates a bigger average publication year. C Spatial density network based on total linkage strength. D Spatial density network based on occurrence frequency.

Next, we conducted a regression curve analysis for GRHs, and the curve population showed that super-enhancer (a = 0.5515, R2 = 0.6586, p = 0.0044), stress granule (a = 0.8000, R2 = 0.6000, p = 0.0085), immunotherapy (a = 0.4848, R2 = 0.4848, p = 0.0253), tumor microenvironment (a = 0.3394, R2 = 0.6988, p = 0.0026), and RNA-binding protein (a = 0.5636, R2 = 0.4089, p = 0.0465) presented significant upward trend (Fig. 2A, Additional file 6). The hotspot burst results demonstrated that super-enhancer and stress granule are emerging burst hotspots (Fig. 2B). More interestingly, the Walktrap algorithm further revealed that “LLPS, cancer, transcription, super-enhancer, epigenetics“(Relevance Percentage[RP] = 100%, Development Percentage[DP] = 29.2%), “stress granule, immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, RNA binding protein“(RP = 79.2%, DP = 33.3%) and “nanoparticle, apoptosis“(RP = 70.8%, DP = 25.0%) are closely associated with this field, but are still under-developed and worthy of further exploration (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Regression curve analysis, hotspot burst analysis, and research prospect discovery of research themes regarding phase separation in the field of oncology.

A The population of regression-fitted curves based on the frequency of annual occurrence for the themes. “a” indicates the slope of the fitted curve. “R2” indicates the degree of correlation between the two variables. B The burst status and temporal evolution of the themes. C The research prospect discovery for the themes. After performing the Walktrap algorithm based on the random walk strategy, all themes were categorized into four quadrants. Quadrant I is for topics highly relevant to the field and already well-developed. Quadrants II and III are topics of low relevance to the field. Quadrant IV is for topics of high relevance to the field but still under-developed, indicating their research prospect.

Discussion

In the last three years, the roles and mechanisms of LLPS in cancer have gradually received deep attention. First, we need to understand how LLPS occurs in cancer. In addition, in some situations, cancer cells develop more complex and diverse structures through LLPS, thus contributing to their survival, recovery, migration, and metastasis [2,3,4]. However, notably, LLPS comprises only one fraction of the complex network in cancer, and further exploration of its roles and potential mechanisms in other biological processes (e.g., gene expression, drug response) will contribute to a better understanding and application of such a complex and subtle phenomenon.

Numerous results in this paper point in unison to super-enhancer as the most potential star molecule in this field. Super-enhancers are unique DNA structures that significantly enhance the efficiency of gene transcription, thereby promoting cancer growth and proliferation, but the specific molecular mechanisms by which they determine cell fate have been unclear [11]. Subsequently, Sabari et al. demonstrated that the transcriptional co-activators bind at super-enhancer to isolate transcription-related components from the complex nucleus by LLPS, thereby regulating critical gene expression, providing a novel perspective for our understanding of gene regulation during cell fate determination and disease onset [12]. However, the relationship and potential mechanisms of super-enhancer and LLPS, as revealed by the Walktrap algorithm in this study, are still under-developed and need further exploration. The same applies to the interactions between stress granules, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy (Additional file 7).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

LLPS:

Liquid-liquid phase separation

GRHs:

Global research hotspots

OF:

Occurrence frequency

TLS:

Total link strength

RP:

Relevance percentage

DP:

Development percentage

References

  1. Zheng L-W, Liu C-C, Yu K-D. Phase separations in oncogenesis, tumor progressions and metastasis: a glance from hallmarks of cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tong X, Tang R, Xu J, Wang W, Zhao Y, Yu X, et al. Liquid–liquid phase separation in tumor biology. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu C, Kim A, Corbin JM, Wang GG. Onco-condensates: formation, multi-component organization, and biological functions. Trends Cancer. 2023;9:738–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu A, Chen G, Bao B, Guo Y, Li D, Wang X, et al. Therapeutic targeting of CNBP phase separation inhibits ribosome biogenesis and neuroblastoma progression via modulating SWI/SNF complex activity. Clin Translational Med. 2023;13:e1235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J Bus Res. 2022;148:101–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo S-B, Du S, Cai K-Y, Cai H-J, Huang W-J, Tian X-P. A scientometrics and visualization analysis of oxidative stress modulator Nrf2 in cancer profiles its characteristics and reveals its association with immune response. Heliyon. 2023;9:e17075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111:1053–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics. 2017;11:959–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo S-B, Pan D-Q, Su N, Huang M-Q, Zhou Z-Z, Huang W-J, et al. Comprehensive scientometrics and visualization study profiles lymphoma metabolism and identifies its significant research signatures. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1266721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang M, Chen Q, Wang S, Xie H, Liu J, Huang R, et al. Super-enhancers complexes zoom in transcription in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabari BR, Dall’Agnese A, Boija A, Klein IA, Coffey EL, Shrinivas K, et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science. 2018;361:eaar3958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely acknowledge the time and effort the editors and reviewers put into our manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XPT and SBG; Performed the experiments: SBG, XZF, WJH and ZZZ; Analyzed and interpreted the data: SBG, XZF, WJH, XPT, and ZZZ; Wrote the paper: SBG, XZF, WJH and XPT; Administered and supervised the project: XPT. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Song-Bin Guo or Xiao-Peng Tian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study did not involve humans or animals, so it did not require ethical approval from institutional committees or consent from patient participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional file 1.

Materials and Methods.

Additional file 2.

List of the Title, Author Information, Document Type, PMID, DOI, and WOS Accession Number of All the 1073 Analyzed Documents.

Additional file 3.

Basic Characteristics of the Data Pool of Phase Separation in Cancer.

Additional file 4.

Quantitative Information on the Corresponding Research Hotspots in the Five Clusters.

Additional file 5.

Seed Papers with the Highest Citation of the Corresponding Top Twelve Research Hotspots in the Five Clusters.

Additional file 6.

Other Regression Curves of Research Theme that Failed to Gain Statistical Evidence.

Additional file 7.

Additional Discussion.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, SB., Feng, XZ., Huang, WJ. et al. Global research hotspots, development trends and prospect discoveries of phase separation in cancer: a decade-long informatics investigation. Biomark Res 12, 39 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-024-00587-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-024-00587-9

Keywords