Skip to main content
  • Correspondence
  • Open access
  • Published:

A functional role of Ephrin type-B receptor 6 (EPHB6) in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract

T-cell lymphoblastic acute leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive blood cancer, characterized by restricted cellular subsets with enriched leukemia initiating cells (LICs). Recently, Ephrin receptors (Eph) were described to be highly expressed in cancer stem cells. Here, using public RNA-Seq datasets of human T-ALL, we reported that EphB6 was the only member within the Eph family overexpressed in over 260 samples. We also found the highest level of EphB6 in a minor cell subpopulation within bulk tumors of patient-derived xenografts, obtained through the injection of primary patient biopsy material into immunocompromised NOD-Scid/IL2Rγc−/− (NSG) mice. Interestingly, this EphB6 positive (EphB6+) subset showed an enriched LIC activity after in vivo transplantation into NSG mice. Additionally, gene expression data at the single-cell level of primary patients’ leukemic cells revealed that EphB6 + cells were significantly selected in minimal residual disease up to 30 days from the standard treatments and characterized by high levels of markers related to cell proliferation and poor clinical outcome, such as CCNB1 and KIF20A. Taken together, our data suggest that EphB6 supports LICs’ maintenance and progression in T-ALL and, thus, targeting EphB6 + cells could be therapeutically relevant for the treatment of T-ALL patients.

To the editor

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a T-cell malignancy, affecting children and adults [1]. The recurrent nature of this tumor and resilience to standard chemotherapy [2], presumably due to the ineffective targeting of leukemia initiating cells (LICs) [3], concur to its lethality. Lately, it was reported that signaling mediated by EphB6 receptor interferes with the efficiency of doxorubicin treatment in T-ALL [4]. Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (Eph) family includes 16 receptors, modulated by ephrin ligands [5] and involved in tumor progression [6] and cancer stem cell maintenance [7, 8]. To address the role of Ephrin signaling in T-ALL, we evaluated the expression of different Eph receptors in 264 T-ALL patients using public available RNA-Seq datasets [9]. We found that EphB6 was the only member within the Eph group, overexpressed in the analyzed T-ALL cases (Fig. 1A) as well as in pairwise comparison with CD3 + normal T-cells (Fig. 1B) and across various human tissues and hematopoietic cells (Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The constitutive expression of EPHB6 receptor in human T-ALL promotes in vitro proliferation and in vivo cell expansion. (A) Analysis of public COG TARGET dataset shows a significant enrichment of EphB6 mRNA level as compared with those of Eph receptors family in T-ALL patients (***P < 0.0001 n = 264, by one-way ANOVA) and (B) higher EphB6 expression in T-ALL cases versus CD3 + T-cells from healthy donors from the Human Protein Atlas database (***P < 0.0001 n = 20, by Mann-Whitney test). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of abundance of GFP + alive cell fraction after transduction with EPHB6 or empty (EV) lentivectors as indicated. Transduced FACS-sorted subsets of PF382 and RPMI-8402 cell lines were tracked over time at the indicated time points by flow cytometry. Alive GFP + cells were discriminated for DAPI exclusion. Means ± SD fraction of the initial transduction value are plotted for experiments performed in biological triplicate. ***, p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).(D-E) Flow cytometry analysis of Ki67 level in PF382 (D) and RPMI-8402 (E) cell lines after transduction with EPHB6 or empty (EV) lentivectors as indicated. Transduced subsets of PF382 and RPMI-8402 cell lines were valued after three days of in vitro growth. (F) t-SNE plots based on the immunophenotyping of M71 (PDX#1) and H3255 (PDX#2), two independent clones of PDX samples by multiparametric flow cytometry. (G) Survival of recipient NSG mice after transplantation with FACS-sorted EPHB6 + cell subsets from M71 (PDX#1) and H3255 (PDX#2) PDX samples. The cell doses injected in each of 4 recipient animals are indicated in parentheses. Two separate experiments are depicted using independent PDX clones as indicated

Fig. 2
figure 2

EphB6 positive cells are characterized by high transcriptional levels of genes related to cell proliferation and significantly selected in minimal residual disease (MRD) of human T-ALL. (A) Hierarchical clustering of EphB6 positive and EphB6 negative subpopulations using 20 differentially expressed genes from M71 (PDX#1), H3255 (PDX#2) and F1313 (PDX#3), three independent PDX clones. A dual-color code represents markers over-(red) and under-represented (blue). (B) Flow cytometric analysis depicting the enrichment of CCNB1 and CDCA3 in EphB6-overexpressing cells (EphB6/GFP) as compared to control (Empty vector/GFP). (C) Heatmap showing the Spearman’s rank correlation between the EphB6 fractions and 15 differentially expressed genes. The higher the statistical correlation the bigger the circles. A dual-color code reports positive (blue) and negative (red) correlation and color intensity represents the increase of correlation. *P < 0.05, by Student’s t-test. (D) tSNE plots based on the single cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data from 4 primary T-ALL samples, CSS12401, CSS13693, CSS15501 and CSS20705 at the diagnosis (d0) and up to 30 days after the start of therapy (MRD) without passaging into immunocompromised mice. In the map, EphB6 negative and positive leukemia cells are colored in grey and red, respectively. (E) Graphical representation of cell percentage in the EphB6 positive cell population at the diagnosis (d0) and up to 30 days after the start of therapy (MRD) according to each sample group. (F) mRNA expression level of CDCA3, CCNB1 and KIF20A genes in EphB6 positive vs. EphB6 negative cells as determined by scRNA-seq data. ***, P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). (G) Higher KIF20A and CCNB1 genes are significantly associated with lower patients’ survival according to the COG TARGET dataset (P = 0.032 and P = 0.029 from log-rank test, n = 264). Kaplan-Meier survival plots shows the same trend for CDCA3 gene although without statistical significance (P = 0.075, n = 264)

To address the potential role of EphB6 receptor in T-ALL, PF382 and RPMI-8402 cell lines were transduced with lentivectors encoding EPHB6 gene or empty vector, as control. Interestingly, the constitutive expression of EPHB6 primed in vitro cell expansion (Fig. 1C) and promoted cell cycling activity as determined by the high level of Ki67 nuclear protein (Fig. 1D-E) and BrdU incorporation (Fig. S2). To confirm the effectiveness of these findings in primary T-ALLs, we assessed two independent clones of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) by multiparameter flow cytometry assay including 10 fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against T-cell lineage markers (Table S1) and identified a distinct cell cluster characterized by high levels of EphB6 receptor (Fig. 1F). EphB6 positive and negative fractions of two PDXs were then FACS sorted and assayed for their in vivo leukemogenic capacity by limiting dilution transplantation assay into immunodeficient NOD-Scid/IL2Rγc−/− (NSG) mice (Fig. 1G and S3). As expected, mice implanted with EphB6 + population died significantly earlier than those injected with EphB6- subset, confirming EphB6 expression as a trait of LIC. Consistently, we found that LIC frequency was higher in EphB6 + populations (Table S4).

We next conducted an RNA-seq comparative transcriptome analysis on EphB6 + and EphB6- cells of three PDXs. Genes involved in cell cycle such as CCNB1, and CDCA3 were highly expressed in EphB6 + cell subsets of PDX and validated in EphB6-transduced cell lines (Fig. 2A-B and S4-5). EphB6 fractions and their transcriptomic fingerprint were also correlated to each other and a significant cogent score of correlation (r > 0.8) was found between the EphB6 + subset and the level of KIF20A, CCNB1 and CDCA3 genes (Fig. 2C). Additionally, we evaluated the transcriptional level of EphB6 transcript in single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) profiling generated from four different human T-ALLs at the diagnosis and minimal residual disease up to 30 days after the start of therapy without any expansion into immunocompromised NSG mice. EphB6 + cells were enriched in MRD (Fig. 2D-E) and showed high transcriptional levels of CCNB1, CDCA3 and KIF20A genes by a meta-clustering and differential gene expression analysis (Fig. 2F and S6B)., Additionally, we found a statistically significant enrichment for the genes associated with high level of EphB6 in PDX samples and derived by the differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data sets (Fig. 2A) by gene expression enrichment analysis (GSEA) (Fig. S6A).

Finally, the predictive potential of biomarkers enriched in the high EphB6-expressing subset as compared to the depleted counterpart was assessed. We found that the high-expression levels of KIF20A and CCNB1 genes were predictors of T-ALL patients’ poor prognosis with respect to their low-expressing counterpart (Fig. 2G) and significantly associated with the increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% CI:0.54–0.91, P < 0.01 and hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI:0.39–0.71, P < 0.001, respectively). High level of CDCA3 gene also pointed to a worse prognosis although not statistically significant (hazard ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-1.00, P > 0.05) (Fig. S7-9).

Taken together, these findings suggest that EphB6 + cells might be selected after conventional treatment, altering the sensitivity of leukemia cells to different drugs [4, 10]. It was already reported that EphB6 directly modulate cellular the activation of Akt signaling in T-ALL cell lines [6, 11, 12]. In agreement with these findings, our data also suggest that EphB6 signaling alter the maintenance and progression of T-ALL cells through regulation of proliferative signaling pathways, involving genes such as CCNB1 and KIF20A related to poor clinical outcome. Finally, these results suggest that LIC-enriched cell subsets may be sensitive to the EphB6 inhibitors. Nonetheless, further studies will be necessary to find the interesting possibility that therapies based on the inhibition of EphB6 signaling may improve the clinical outcomes in T-ALL patients.

Data Availability

The RNA-Seq and single cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data are accessible at NCBI SRA PRJNA972695 and PRJNA784728 respectively. For other original data, please contact the correspondent author.

References

  1. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2008;371(9617):1030–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guru Murthy GS, Pondaiah SK, Abedin S, Atallah E. Incidence and survival of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(5):1171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Magee JA, Piskounova E, Morrison SJ. Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(3):283–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. El Zawily A, McEwen E, Toosi B, Vizeacoumar FS, Freywald T, Vizeacoumar FJ, Freywald A. The EphB6 receptor is overexpressed in pediatric T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and increases its sensitivity to doxorubicin treatment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Committee EN. Unified nomenclature for eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Eph Nomenclature Committee Cell. 1997;90(3):403–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maddigan A, Truitt L, Arsenault R, Freywald T, Allonby O, Dean J, et al. EphB receptors trigger akt activation and suppress Fas receptor-induced apoptosis in malignant T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2011;187(11):5983–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lodola A, Giorgio C, Incerti M, Zanotti I, Tognolini M. Targeting Eph/ephrin system in cancer therapy. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;142:152–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Binda E, Visioli A, Giani F, Lamorte G, Copetti M, Pitter KL, et al. The EphA2 receptor drives self-renewal and tumorigenicity in stem-like tumor-propagating cells from human glioblastomas. Cancer Cell. 2012;22(6):765–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Easton J, Shao Y, Maciaszek J, Wang Z, Wilkinson MR, et al. The genomic landscape of pediatric and young adult T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2017;49(8):1211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Toosi BM, El Zawily A, Truitt L, Shannon M, Allonby O, Babu M, et al. EPHB6 augments both development and drug sensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer tumours. Oncogene. 2018;37(30):4073–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo H, Wan X, Wu Y, Wu J. Cross-linking of EphB6 resulting in signal transduction and apoptosis in jurkat cells. J Immunol. 2001;167(3):1362–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Strozen TG, Sharpe JC, Harris ED, Uppalapati M, Toosi BM. The EphB6 receptor: kinase-dead but very much alive. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Andrew P. Weng (BC Cancer research, Terry Fox Laboratory) for kindly providing M71 and H3255 PDX cells.

Funding

This work was supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro [IG-23070 to V.G.], the Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2016-02361287 to V.G.] [GR-2011-02351534 to E.B.], Progetto Ricerca Corrente 2020–2023 to E.B. and V.G. and Worldwide Cancer Research [20–0318 to V.G].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.B. and V.G. conceived the study; G.R., E.B. and V.G. provided materials; E.DeS., N.T., F.S., F.T., M.C., A.V., C.B., G.M. and R.P. performed the experiments and acquired data; G.M., N.T., G.M., E.B, R.P. and V.G. performed the statistical and bioinformatics analyses; V.G. and E.B. provided funding; E.B. and V.G. wrote the paper; E.DeS., N.T., M.C., G.M., E.B., and V.G. reviewed the scientific literature, wrote the paper and critically revised the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elena Binda or Vincenzo Giambra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The cohort of human samples involved in this study were enrolled at “Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” after approval of the institutional Ethic board (Prot. N.155/CE, ICF: V1.0_16 Mag 18). All the subject agreed to participate with signed informed consent and all human samples and data were collected and utilized according to the ethical guidelines of 2013 Declaration of Helsinki. Material was anonymized at the time of collection. The animal procedures were performed according to the Italian Regulation for Animal Health and Welfare after protocol approval by the Institutional Review Boards of the Italian Ministry of Health (509/2018-PR).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Alberto Visioli is an employee of Stemgen Spa and does not own shares in the Company. The others authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colucci, M., Trivieri, N., Mencarelli, G. et al. A functional role of Ephrin type-B receptor 6 (EPHB6) in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biomark Res 11, 92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00531-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00531-3

Keywords