Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of the KRAS G12C mutation in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients

Biomarker Research volume 8, Article number: 22 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The KRAS mutation is the second most common genetic variant in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. At the 2019th World Conference of Lung Cancer, the KRAS G12C-specific inhibitor AMG510 showed promising results in the phase I clinical trial. However, the frequency, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of the KRAS G12C mutation in Chinese NSCLC patients are rarely reported.

Methods

Next-generation sequencing was used to confirm the KRAS mutation status in 40,804 NSCLC patients from multiple centers (mCohort). Survival data were collected retrospectively from 1456 patients at one of the centers, the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (iCohort).

Results

In the mCohort, 3998 patients (9.8%) were confirmed to harbor a KRAS mutation, of whom 1179 (29.5%) had the G12C subtype. In the iCohort, 130 NSCLC patients (8.9%) had a KRAS mutation and 42 (32.3%) had the G12C subtype. The G12C subgroup included more male patients (85.2% vs 67.4%, P < 0.0001) and more smokers (76.2% vs 53.4%, P = 0.02) than did the non-G12C subgroup. Both the KRAS mutation group and KRAS G12C mutation subgroup were associated with a shorter median overall survival (OS) than wildtype tumors (15.1 vs 26.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]KRAS = 1.50, P = 0.002; 18.3 vs 26.7 months, HRG12C = 1.66, P = 0.007). In Cox regression analysis, smoking (HR = 1.39, P = 0.05) and stage IV disease (HR = 2.72, P < 0.001) remained as independent predictors of shorter OS. Both the KRAS mutation (HR = 1.30, P = 0.07) and KRAS G12C mutation (HR = 1.47, P = 0.07) reached borderline significance.

Conclusions

In the largest sample used thus for, our study found that approximately 10% of Chinese NSCLC patients had KRAS mutations. Of these, nearly 30% harbored the KRAS G12C mutation subtype, which was most common in male smokers. The KRAS G12C mutation is a biomarker of poor prognosis in Chinese NSCLC patients, which could potentially be improved by G12C-specific inhibitors in the future.

(296 words)

Background

Rapid developments have been achieved in the area of epidermal growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer patients [1,2,3,4,5]. Although treatment resistance is inevitable, advances of third-generation EGFR-TKIs prolong the survival of patients with EGFR mutations. The KRAS mutation is the second most common genetic variant in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [6]. Many retrospective and prospective studies have attempted to treat KRAS mutation patients with EGFR-TKIs [7] and MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors [8, 9], but none were successful. No targeted therapy is available for patients with KRAS mutations and chemotherapy remains the standard. Patients with KRAS mutations seemed to respond to checkpoint blockade therapy in several recently published studies [10,11,12]. In addition to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors, KRAS G12C-specific inhibitors show promising preclinical and clinical results [13]. The World Conference of Lung Cancer in 2019 presented promising and up-to-date clinical data on the drug AMG510, which was given to 13 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at a dose of 960 mg once per day. Seven patients achieved partial response and six achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 54% and the disease control rate was 100%. Additionally, a series of clinical trials targeting KRAS G12C mutations with G12C-specific inhibitors, including RMC-4630 and MRTX849 are ongoing [14, 15].

It was reported that 30% of Caucasian NSCLC patients harbored KRAS mutations, of which 35 ~ 45% were of the G12C subtype [16, 17]. Therefore, the incidence of KRAS G12C mutations in NSCLC in those Caucasian patients was nearly 12%. In Asians, however, the frequency of KRAS G12C mutations has rarely been studied and the prognosis of those carrying the G12C mutation is still unclear. Here, we examined the incidence of this mutation subtype, and its clinical characteristics, in Chinese NSCLC patients drawn from two cohorts and explored the prognostic role of the KRAS G12C mutation.

Methods

Patients

From January 2016 to September 2019, the NGS results from 40,804 NSCLC patients from multiple centers (mCohort) were analyzed; of these patients, 3998 had KRAS mutations. In total, 1776 patients with KRAS mutations had NGS results analyzed from tumor tissue, 1646 from tumor tissue and liquid biopsy, and 576 from liquid biopsy alone (e.g., peripheral blood, pleural effusion and cerebrospinal fluid). Clinical data of these patients were pooled retrospectively and the factors included in the analysis were age, sex, pathology, and clinical stage at the time of diagnosis. Smoking history and survival data of 1456 NSCLC patients from one of the centers, the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (iCohort), were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records.

Analysis

The chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of pathological diagnosis of lung cancer to the date of death or last follow-up, with a cut-off date of September 2019. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate OS in different genomic groups. The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS and KRAS G12C mutations on OS. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value less than 0.05.

Results

Frequency of KRAS G12C mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients

In the mCohort, 3998 NSCLC patients had KRAS mutations; 25 patients had two KRAS mutation subtypes, and the frequency of KRAS mutations was 9.8%. Of the patients with KRAS mutations, 1179 (29.5%) were confirmed to harbor G12C mutations (Fig. 1a). The proportions of the other three major KRAS codon 12 subtypes were as follows: G12V, 18.3% (N = 731); G12D, 17.3% (N = 693); and G12A, 8.4% (N = 334) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow charts of NSCLC patient enrollment in the study. Patients included from multiple centers cohort (mCohort) a. Patients included and excluded from Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute cohort (iCohort) b. pts.: patients

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Pie charts of NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations. Pie charts showing the proportions of KRAS mutation and wildtype tumors in the mCohort (left), and the proportions of different KRAS mutation subtypes in the mCohort (right) which included patients from the iCohort

Full size image

In the iCohort, 130 of 1456 NSCLC patients (8.9%) were confirmed to have KRAS mutations, of whom 42 (32.3%) harbored G12C mutations; there were 304 wildtype patients (excluding EGFR mutation, ALK fusion, ROS1 fusion and BRAF mutation) (Fig. 1b). The distribution of KRAS mutation subtypes was comparable to that in the mCohort. For the other three major codon 12 subtypes, the proportions were as follows: G12D, 19.2% (N = 25); G12V, 13.1% (N = 17); and G12A, 6.9% (N = 9) (Fig. 2).

Clinical characteristics of patients with the KRAS G12C mutation

The clinical and pathological characteristics of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C and non-G12C KRAS mutations were compared in the mCohort (Table 1). The mean ages of the G12C and non-G12C subtype patients were 63 and 62 years old, respectively (P = 0.02). The proportion of male patients was higher in the G12C subgroup than that in the non-G12C subgroup (85.2% vs 67.4%, P < 0.0001). Most of the G12C and non-G12C subtype patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (rates were more than 90% in both groups). Nearly 40% of the patients were diagnosed with stage IV disease in the G12C and non-G12C subgroups. In the iCohort, the clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients with G12C and non-G12C mutations were comparable to those in the mCohort. Of note, in the iCohort, 76.2% of the patients in the G12C subgroup were former or current smokers, compared with 53.4% of those in the non-G12C subgroup (P = 0.02).

Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutations from the mCohort
Full size table

The clinical characteristics of KRAS mutation and wildtype tumors were also compared in the iCohort. In the KRAS mutation and wildtype subgroups, 79.2 and 71.7% of the patients were male (P = 0.10), respectively, with median ages of 63 and 61 years (P = 0.01); 60.8 and 53.3% were former or current smokers (P = 0.15), respectively. Most patients in both the KRAS mutation and wildtype subgroups had adenocarcinoma and stage IV disease.

Prognostic value of the KRAS G12C mutation

Survival data were collected retrospectively for 130 KRAS mutation and 304 wildtype patients from the iCohort. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, regardless of the KRAS mutation group or the KRAS G12C mutation subgroup, both were associated with a shorter median OS compared with wildtype tumors (15.1 vs 26.7 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]KRAS = 1.50, P = 0.002; 18.3 vs 26.7 months, HRG12C = 1.66, P = 0.007) (Fig. 3a, b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Survival analysis of NSCLC patients with KRAS and KRAS G12C mutations. Overall survival (OS) analysis of KRAS mutation and wildtype tumors a. OS analysis of KRAS G12C mutation and wildtype tumors b. m: months; wt: wild type; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval

Full size image

To identify the prognostic values of the KRAS and KRAS G12C mutations on OS, clinical and molecular variables were included in Cox regression analysis. In the univariate analysis, age, male, smoker, stage IV disease, KRAS mutation, and KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutations were identified as independent factors for shorter OS (Table 2). In the multivariate Cox model, smoker (HR = 1.39, P = 0.05) and stage IV disease (HR = 2.72, P < 0.0001) remained as independent factors for poor prognosis. Both the KRAS mutation (HR = 1.47, P = 0.07) and the KRAS G12C mutation (HR = 1.23, P = 0.07) were borderline statistically significant.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival based on clinical and molecular variables
Full size table

Discussion

The frequency of KRAS mutations is much higher in Caucasian NSCLC patients, at around 30%, than in Asian patients [18]. In our study, 9.8% of the patients in the mCohort harbored KRAS mutations, similar to the rates reported by Zhou’s group [19]. EGFR and KRAS mutations are mutually exclusive, and Asian patients with NSCLC tend to have more EGFR mutations and thus fewer KRAS mutations [20]. The frequency of KRAS G12C mutations in Caucasians ranges from 35 to 45% [16, 18, 21, 22]. In our study, 29.5% of KRAS mutations in the mCohort were of the G12C subtype, which means that nearly 3% of these Chinese NSCLC patients harbored KRAS G12C mutations.

In Caucasians, KRAS mutations are more common in females and smokers [21,22,23]. Moreover, Dogan et al. and Osta et al. reported that G12C mutations were more common in women and those with a smoking history [17, 24]. By contrast, we found that male smokers more commonly harbored KRAS mutations, including G12C mutations, which is consistent with Guan et al. [25]. Although only a small proportion of KRAS mutation patients enrolled in the mCohort were diagnosed with stage I or II disease, KRAS mutation seems to be an early event that might drive lung cancer development [18, 21, 22, 25]. Furthermore, the KRAS G12C mutation might be a drug target in early stage lung cancer.

The prognostic role of KRAS mutations in NSCLC patients in early and advanced stages is becoming clear. Two studies enrolled surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients and found that those with KRAS mutation tumors had worse disease free survival and OS compared with wildtype patients [21, 22]. Even after excluding EGFR mutations, a significant survival difference persisted. A poor prognosis of KRAS mutation patients in advanced lung cancer stages has also been reported [17, 26]. Guan et al., from our institute, enrolled stage I to IV lung cancer patients. To eliminate bias of disease stage, patients were randomly paired, and KRAS mutations still predicted a poor prognosis [25]. Our results are consistent with the available data indicating a shorter OS for KRAS mutations, compared to wildtype tumors. However, the prognostic role of KRAS G12C mutations has been rarely reported. Nadal et al. showed that the KRAS G12C mutation was associated with poor outcomes in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma and remained an independent prognostic marker for OS in multivariate analysis [22]. Svaton et al. indicated that patients with G12C mutations had shorter median OS compared to non-G12C KRAS mutation and wildtype patients (6.4 vs 10.3 vs 16.1 months, P = 0.01) [26]. In our study, more than 80% of the NSCLC patients exhibited advanced disease. The median OS of the G12C mutation and wildtype patients was 18.3 and 26.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.66, P = 0.007). The prognostic value of the G12C mutation was identified in Cox regression analysis. Although the P-value reached statistical margin, this may have been due to the small sample size of KRAS mutation patients in the iCohort. Patients with KRAS mutations could receive chemotherapy as standard treatment; some could choose immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. No other choices were available for clinicians to prescribe for these patients. Thus, detailed information regarding the treatment is not presented in Table 2. In general, the KRAS G12C mutation was a prognostic biomarker for poor OS in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Our study included the largest sample size of NSCLC patients harboring KRAS mutations thus far. However, it had a few limitations. First, we only had clinical and pathological data for the NSCLC patients from multiple centers and lacked survival data. Thus, the prognostic role of the KRAS G12C mutation in poor OS were taken from only one of the centers, namely, the iCohort. Second, in the iCohort, there were more stage IV patients in the KRAS mutation subgroup than in the wildtype subgroup, which may have affected the results where KRAS mutations were associated with a poor prognosis (P = 0.01). However, this result has been repeated in previously published studies. Similarly, although more patients had stage IV disease in the G12C subgroup than in the wildtype subgroup, the difference in their distribution did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.10). Thus, results regarding the prognostic roles of KRAS mutations and G12C mutation were reliable. Third, racial differences in the KRAS G12C mutation should be explored further in future studies.

Conclusion

In general, our study identified that approximately 9% of Chinese NSCLC patients had KRAS mutations. Of these, nearly 30% harbored the KRAS G12C mutation subtype, which often occurred in male smokers. The KRAS G12C mutation predicted a poor OS, which could potentially be improved by specific G12C inhibitors in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

EGFR-TKIs:

Epidermal growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

HR:

Hazard ratio

LCLC:

Large cell lung cancer

MEK :

MAP-ERK kinase

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

OS:

Overall survival

References

  1. Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, Cho BC, Gray JE, Ohe Y, et al. Overall survival with Osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang C, Leighl NB, Wu YL, Zhong WZ. Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qiu Z, Chen Z, Zhang C, Zhong W. Achievements and futures of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2019;8:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akinleye A, Rasool Z. Immune checkpoint inhibitors of PD-L1 as cancer therapeutics. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gou LY, Wu YL. Prevalence of driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancers in the People’s Republic of China. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2014;5:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiala O, Pesek M, Finek J, Benesova L, Belsanova B, Minarik M. The dominant role of G12C over other KRAS mutation types in the negative prediction of efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Genet. 2013;206:26–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Janne PA, Smith I, McWalter G, Mann H, Dougherty B, Walker J, et al. Impact of KRAS codon subtypes from a randomised phase II trial of selumetinib plus docetaxel in KRAS mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:199–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Janne PA, van den Heuvel MM, Barlesi F, Cobo M, Mazieres J, Crino L, et al. Selumetinib plus Docetaxel compared with Docetaxel alone and progression-free survival in patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung Cancer: the SELECT-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:1844–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufman J, Stinchcombe TE. Treatment of KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung Cancer: the end of the beginning for targeted therapies. JAMA. 2017;317:1835–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Skoulidis F, Byers LA, Diao L, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Tong P, Izzo J, et al. Co-occurring genomic alterations define major subsets of KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with distinct biology, immune profiles, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:860–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong ZY, Zhong WZ, Zhang XC, Su J, Xie Z, Liu SY, et al. Potential predictive value of TP53 and KRAS mutation status for response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3012–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Canon J, Rex K, Saiki AY, Mohr C, Cooke K, Bagal D, et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2019;575:217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sh IO, Koczywas M, Ulahannan S, Janne PA, Pacheco JM, Burris HA, et al. The SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4630 in patients with KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung Cancer: preliminary evaluation of a first-in-man phase 1 clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:A12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallin J, Engstrom LD, Hargis L, Calinisan A, Aranda R, Briere DM, et al. The KRAS(G12C) inhibitor MRTX849 provides insight toward therapeutic susceptibility of KRAS-mutant cancers in mouse models and patients. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aredo JV, Padda SK, Kunder CA, Han SS, Neal JW, Shrager JB, et al. Impact of KRAS mutation subtype and concurrent pathogenic mutations on non-small cell lung cancer outcomes. Lung Cancer. 2019;133:144–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El Osta B, Behera M, Kim S, Berry LD, Sica G, Pillai RN, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with metastatic KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas: the lung Cancer mutation consortium experience. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:876–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheffler M, Ihle MA, Hein R, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Scheel AH, Siemanowski J, et al. K-ras mutation subtypes in NSCLC and associated co-occuring mutations in other oncogenic pathways. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:606–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia Y, Jiang T, Li X, Zhao C, Zhang L, Zhao S, et al. Characterization of distinct types of KRAS mutation and its impact on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:6525–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tu HY, Ke EE, Yang JJ, Sun YL, Yan HH, Zheng MY, et al. A comprehensive review of uncommon EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;114:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Izar B, Zhou H, Heist RS, Azzoli CG, Muzikansky A, Scribner EE, et al. The prognostic impact of KRAS, its codon and amino acid specific mutations, on survival in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:1363–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadal E, Chen G, Prensner JR, Shiratsuchi H, Sam C, Zhao L, et al. KRAS-G12C mutation is associated with poor outcome in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:1513–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zer A, Ding K, Lee SM, Goss GD, Seymour L, Ellis PM, et al. Pooled analysis of the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS mutation status and mutation subtype in patients with non-small cell lung Cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:312–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dogan S, Shen R, Ang DC, Johnson ML, D’Angelo SP, Paik PK, et al. Molecular epidemiology of EGFR and KRAS mutations in 3,026 lung adenocarcinomas: higher susceptibility of women to smoking-related KRAS-mutant cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6169–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guan JL, Zhong WZ, An SJ, Yang JJ, Su J, Chen ZH, et al. KRAS mutation in patients with lung cancer: a predictor for poor prognosis but not for EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1381–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Svaton M, Fiala O, Pesek M, Bortlicek Z, Minarik M, Benesova L, et al. The prognostic role of KRAS mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with second- or third-line chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:1077–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Yang Shao, Mr. Xian Zhang, Mr. Jun-Yi Ye and Miss. Chun-Xiang Chen for providing data regarding patients with KRAS mutations from multiple centers.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1303800 to Q. Zhou), Special Fund of Public Interest by National Health and Family Control Committee (201402031 to Y.L. Wu), Key Lab System Project of Guangdong Science and Technology Department and Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer (2012A061400006, 2017B030314120 to Y.L. WU) and Health Collaborative Innovation Major Project from Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (201400000001–2 to Y.L. WU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Si-Yang Liu, Hao Sun, Jia-Ying Zhou, Guang-Ling Jie, Zhi Xie, Xu-Chao Zhang, Qing Zhou, Jin-Ji Yang & Yi-Long Wu

  2. Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, 210032, China

    Yang Shao & Xian Zhang

  3. Burning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, 510000, China

    Jun-Yi Ye & Chun-Xiang Chen

Authors
  1. Si-Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jia-Ying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guang-Ling Jie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhi Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jun-Yi Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chun-Xiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xu-Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Qing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jin-Ji Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yi-Long Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: Prof. Yi-Long Wu; Acquisition of clinical data: Dr. Si-Yang Liu, Dr. Jia-Ying Zhou, Dr. Guang-Ling Jie and Dr. Hao Sun; Analysis and interpretation of the data: Dr. Si-Yang Liu, Mr. Yang Shao, Mr. Xian Zhang, Mr. Jun-Yi Ye and Miss. Chun-Xiang Chen; Manuscript drafting and revision: Dr. Si-Yang Liu and Prof. Yi-Long Wu; Final approval of the manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Long Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The procedures in this study were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (2013185H). All patients provided written informed consent for the use of their NGS results.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, SY., Sun, H., Zhou, JY. et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of the KRAS G12C mutation in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. Biomark Res 8, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-020-00199-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-020-00199-z

Keywords

  • KRAS mutation
  • KRAS G12C mutation
  • Prognosis
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Chinese patients

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us