Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mesothelin as a biomarker for targeted therapy

Biomarker Research volume 7, Article number: 18 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

CAR-T cell therapy targeting CD19 has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of B cell malignancies, while various solid malignancies are still refractory for lack of suitable target. In recent years, a large number of studies have sought to find suitable targets with low “on target, off tumor” concern for the treatment of solid tumors. Mesothelin (MSLN), a tumor-associated antigen broadly overexpressed on various malignant tumor cells, while its expression is generally limited to normal mesothelial cells, is an attractive candidate for targeted therapy. Strategies targeting MSLN, including antibody-based drugs, vaccines and CAR-T therapies, have been assessed in a large number of preclinical investigations and clinical trials. In particular, the development of CAR-T therapy has shown great promise as a treatment for various types of cancers. The safety, efficacy, doses, and pharmacokinetics of relevant strategies have been evaluated in many clinical trials. This review is intended to provide a brief overview of the characteristics of mesothelin and the development of strategies targeting MSLN for solid tumors. Further, we discussed the challenges and proposed potential strategies to improve the efficacy of MSLN targeted immunotherapy.

Background

The discovery and function of MSLN

The MSLN gene encodes a 71-KD precursor, which is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored membrane glycoprotein that is cleaved into two products at arginine 295 (Arg295): a soluble 31-KD N-terminal protein called megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) and a 40-KD membrane-bound fragment called MSLN (mesothelin). Both MPF and MSLN are bioactive, but their exact functions remain unclear. MPF was initially reported to stimulate megakaryocyte colony formation in the presence of interleukin-3 in mice but not alone [1], while its activity is unknown in humans. MSLN was first described as a membrane protein expressed on mesothelioma and ovarian cancer cells [2] and normal mesothelial cells [2, 3]. A previous study showed that MSLN seemed to be a nonessential component in normal cells, as MSLN knockout mice did not present with abnormal development or reproduction [4]. In contrast, preclinical and clinical studies showed that aberrant MSLN expression on tumor cells plays an important role in promoting proliferation and invasion [5]. MSLN has also been identified as a receptor of CA125 that mediates cell adhesion [6]. The interaction of CA125 and MSLN play an important role in ovarian cancer cell peritoneal implantation and increase the motility and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells [7,8,9]. The overexpression of MSLN could activate the NFκB, MAPK, and PI3K pathways and subsequently induce resistance to apoptosis [10] or promote cell proliferation, migration, and metastasis by inducing the activation and expression of MMP7 [9] and MMP9 [5]. An increase in tumor burden and poor overall survival are associated with elevated MSLN expression according to clinical observations [11, 12]. Structural prediction revealed that a superhelical structure with armadillo-type repeats constitutes a part of its three-dimensional structure [13], and the structure of an N-terminal fragment that binds to the Fab SS1 antibody has been clarified [14], but the structure of the whole protein is still unclear.

Expression of MSLN in malignant cells and prognosis

Generally, MSLN is expressed on normal mesothelial cells in the pleura, pericardium, and peritoneum and in epithelial cells on the surface of the ovary, tunica vaginalis, rete testis, and fallopian tubes in trace amounts [3]. In contrast, the aberrant overexpression of MSLN is observed in various cancer cells. MSLN was initially characterized in mesothelioma and ovarian cancer by Chang et al. with the mAb K1 [15]. Chang and colleagues found that MSLN was present in 10 of 15 nonmucinous ovarian cancers and absent in all 4 mucinous ovarian cancers examined [2]. In addition, all 15 cases of epithelial mesothelioma, but none of the 4 cases of sarcomatous mesothelioma, expressed MSLN [16]. This was in line with the results of another independent study that confirmed MSLN reactivity in all 44 epithelioid mesotheliomas and in the epithelial components of 3 biphasic mesotheliomas, but not in any of 8 sarcomatous mesotheliomas examined [17]. According to the statistics in this study, MSLN was present in 15 of 48 (31%) lung cancers (adenocarcinomas (12/31) and squamous carcinomas (limited, 3/17)) and in 42 of 86 (49%) nonpulmonary adenocarcinomas (ovary (14/14), peritoneum (5/5), endometrium (6/9), pancreas (10/11), stomach (2/4), and colon (5/16); none of 12 breast, 9 kidney, 4 thyroid, and 2 prostate cancers showed evidence of MSLN) according to assays with the 5B2 anti-MSLN monoclonal antibody. MSLN was immunohistochemically evaluated in 596 lung carcinomas of different types by Miettinen M and Sarlomo-Rikala M in 2003 [18]. MSLN reactivity was observed in 78 of 148 (53%) adenocarcinomas, 29 of 124 (23%) squamous cell carcinomas and 15 of 118 (13%) large cell carcinomas but was absent in small cell carcinomas. These results suggest that MSLN could act as an immunohistochemical biomarker for the determination of the subtype classification of mesotheliomas and lung cancer to a certain degree because of its specific expression pattern in these two cancers. MSLN is expressed in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and independent studies revealed that almost 100% of pancreatic cancers are positive for MSLN but that normal pancreatic tissues did not show evidence of MSLN [3, 19, 20]. Subsequent studies demonstrated the expression of MSLN in a broad spectrum of solid tumors with distinct frequency and distribution patterns, including extrahepatic biliary cancers (95%), triple negative breast cancer (66%), endometrial carcinomas (59%), colorectal carcinomas (30%), cervical carcinomas (25%) and esophageal (46%), endometrial (89%) and thymic cancer [3, 21,22,23,24,25,26]. A recent study reported that 25.6% of 117 patients with gastric carcinoma showed high levels of MSLN expression, which was associated with a poor prognosis [27]. We also detected MSLN expression to different degrees in 9 gastric cancer tissues but not in normal gastric tissue [28]. The elevated expression of MSLN was correlated with poorer prognoses in patients with ovarian cancer [29], cholangiocarcinoma [30, 31], lung adenocarcinoma [29, 32], triple negative breast cancer [4, 33] and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma [34,35,36].

In addition, MSLN is shed into the serum of patients with solid tumors, in which it is referred to as soluble MSLN-related protein (SMRP) [37]. The production of SMRP could be associated with abnormal splicing, which results in a secreted form or its cleavage from the membrane by the TNFα-converting enzyme ADAM17 [38]. SMRP was also identified as a promising cancer biomarker in the sera of patients with mesothelioma, in which elevated SMR levels in serum was correlated with advanced stage and increased disease burden [37, 39]. However, the sensitivity and specificity of SMRP as a tumor marker in ovarian cancer was limited [40]. The value of soluble MSLN in diagnosis and the prediction of cancer progression remains to be determined, and its combination with other tumor markers may be more precise for diagnosis.

Targeted therapy

Given that MSLN expression is rather limited in several normal tissues but highly elevated in the solid tumors mentioned above, MSLN is a potential target for antigen-specific therapy (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

MSLN-targeted therapy strategies. a, the precursor protein is cleaved into two products, i.e. soluble protein MPF and GPI-anchored membrane protein MSLN; b, anti-MSLN antibody derived scFv, Fab, or intact/modified antibody are conjugated with the effector molecules (inhibitor or toxin) and induce cell death after binding to tumor cells; c, the binding of amatuximab to MSLN expressed on tumor cell membrane leads to ADCC; d, HPN536 directs T cells to kill tumor cells expressing MSLN; e, cancer vaccines arouse tumor specific immune response; f, the T cells are engineering to express CAR and redirected to tumor cells

Full size image

Antibody-based drugs

Antibody-based drugs are used to target and kill tumor cells via neutralization by antibodies, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) or antibodies conjugated with effector molecules (toxins or inhibitors), which mediate apoptosis or suppress cell proliferation.

The specific uptake of the indium111−labeled MSLN antibody K1 by tumor cells was observed by Hassen et al. [41]. The conjugation of a fragment of Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE) to this antibody resulted in cytotoxicity in MSLN-expressing cell lines and tumor regression in tumor-bearing mice [42]. A new murine-derived antibody with higher affinity termed SS1 was produced via phage display and hotspot mutagenesis [43, 44]. The fusion of the PE38 portion to SS1 resulted in a recombinant immunotoxin (RIT) termed SS1P, which enters cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and induces apoptosis by inactivating elongation factor 2 to impede protein synthesis [45]. Many drugs based on the MSLN antibody SS1 or other modified and humanized versions have been developed for targeted therapy (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical trials for MSLN-targeted therapies based on antibody-based drugs and vaccines
Full size table

SS1P

SS1P has been tested in several clinical trials that enrolled patients with advanced cancers. In an early phase I clinical trial (NCT00066651) [48], the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SS1P were tested in 34 patients with mesothelioma (n = 20), ovarian cancer (n = 12) and pancreatic cancer (n = 2). With a limited sample size, this clinical trial demonstrated that the combination of SS1P with prednisone can reduce the risk of toxicity due to SS1P and allow the use of an increased drug dosage. No significant pericardial toxicity was observed in any of the patients, which suggested that the MSLN antibody SS1P presented less risk to pericardial mesothelial cells. Among the 33 evaluable patients, 4 had a partial response (PR), 19 had stable disease (SD), and 10 had progressive disease (PD). However, SS1P was proven to be immunogenic in a later clinical trial (NCT00006981) [49]. Twenty-four patients with chemo-resistant solid tumors received SS1P treatment at dosages of 4, 8, 12, 18, and 25 μg/kg/day (× 10). One patient had a PR, 12 had SD, and 11 had PD. It is noteworthy that high levels of neutralizing antibodies against SS1P were detected in 75% of patients, which could undermine the anti-tumor efficacy.

Given that the administration of SS1P alone showed a moderate effect, the combination therapy might be more effective. In the clinical trial NCT01362790 [47], 10 patients with chemotherapy-refractory mesothelioma received SS1P in combination with pentostatin and cyclophosphamide. Three patients had a PR (44% ~ 74%), 3 had SD and 4 had PD. Adverse events were evaluated for all patients. Grade 3 toxicities, including noncardiac chest pain, pleuritic pain, and back pain (9% each) were observed, but no grade 4 toxicities were observed in patients. Meanwhile, adverse events associated with pentostatin or cyclophosphamide, such as grade 4 lymphopenias, were observed in all patients. In contrast to the trials described above, the involvement of pentostatin and cyclophosphamide delayed the formation of neutralizing antibodies to SS1P, thereby allowing a prolonged period of therapy. SS1P combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin was further tested for treating chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (NCT01445392) [46]. Of the 20 evaluable subjects, 12 patients had a PR, 3 had SD, and 5 had PD. Notably, the changes in the relative serum levels of MSLN, MPF and CA125 were significantly correlated with responses (PR > SD > PD). These biomarker levels were generally decreased in 12 patients who received PR but were substantially increased in 5 patients who had PD.

Amatuximab

Amatuximab (MORAb-009) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody consisting of the SS1 scFv fused to the human IgG1 and κ constant regions. The binding of amatuximab to MSLN expressed on tumor cell surfaces leads to ADCC.

Two clinical trials (NCT00570713 and NCT00738582) showed that no severe (grade 3 or 4) drug hypersensitivity adverse events (DHAEs) were observed in any of the subjects. Among the 20 of 24 patients evaluable for response, none had complete or partial responses, and only 11 patients had SD and 9 had PD [52]. MORAb-009 treatment resulted in a remarkable elevation in serum CA125 levels in all 8 patients under surveillance, possibly due to the interruption of binding between MSLN and CA125 by amatuximab, which could prevent the intraperitoneal/intrapleural metastasis of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma [53]. A clinical trial (NCT01018784) in Japanese patients with mesothelioma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma or other MSLN-positive solid tumors revealed that the weekly single administration of amatuximab in 4-week cycles at increasing doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg/m2 led to limited treatment effects. Three of the 17 patients had SD, and 14 had PD [51].

The anti-tumor effect of amatuximab in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin was elevated in 89 patients at 26 centers (NCT00738582) [54]. Amatuximab in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin was administered according to the response (PR or SD) for up to 6 cycles. Thirty-three patients had a PR, and 42 had SD. The detection of the change in the MPF level in serum before and after treatment in 59 patients also showed that the decreased MPF level was correlated with good prognosis. The combination therapy led to severe adverse events, including hypersensitivity reactions, neutropenia, and atrial fibrillation. Dyspnea and fatigue were observed during the maintenance phase.

An 111Indium (111In) radiolabel was used to characterize the biodistribution and dosimetry of amatuximab in 6 patients (4 with malignant mesothelioma and 2 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma) [60]. SPECT/CT imaging showed 111In-amatuximab uptake in both primary tumors and metastatic sites and that uptake was increased in mesothelioma compared with that in pancreatic cancer. Notably, 111In-amatuximab uptake in the heart, liver, kidneys and spleen was also confirmed. Even so, amatuximab was generally well tolerated. Amatuximab PK was characterized in the clinical trial NCT02357147. It revealed that higher amatuximab exposure in combination with chemotherapy was associated with prolonged OS [50].

Anetumab ravtansine

Anetumab ravtansine, also referred to as BAY94–9343, is a human anti-MSLN antibody fused to DM4, which is a maytansinoid tubulin inhibitor that mainly affects proliferating cells. The specific binding of BAY94–9343 to MSLN with high affinity induces efficient antigen internalization. BAY94–9343 showed dose-dependent anti-tumor efficacy and bystander effects in xenogeneic tumor models [56]. The antitumor efficacy of anetumab ravtansine in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, copanlisib and bevacizumab was investigated for the treatment of ovarian cancer. The involvement of combination therapy showed enhanced anti-proliferative activity and increased apoptosis in vitro and improved in vivo efficacy in tumor-bearing mice [55]. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were then evaluated in clinical trials. Several phase 1/2 studies were carried out to explore the dosage and side effects of anetumab ravtansine when administered together with pemetrexed, cisplatin, PLD, itraconazole, gemcitabine, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, gemcitabine hydrochloride, ipilimumab or nivolumab (Table 1). However, only one clinical trial data for anetumab ravtansine was submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov prior to the submission of this review.

DMOT4039A

DMOT4039A is a humanized anti-MSLN mAb (h7D9.v3) fused to the antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) [61]. It inhibited cell proliferation at an IC50 of 0.3 nmol/L and regressed tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner in a mouse model. In another clinical trial (NCT01469793), DMOT4039A was administered to 71 patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 40) or ovarian cancer (n = 31) [62]. Fifty-four patients received a DMOT4039A injection every 3 weeks (2.4–2.8 mg/kg; q3w), and 17 patients received an injection weekly (0.8–1.2 mg/ kg). Hyperglycemia (grade 3) and hypophosphatemia (grade 3) were observed in 2 patients treated with DMOT4039A every 3 weeks at a dosage of 2.8 mg/kg but no DLTs were observed in patients treated with other dosages. Related severe adverse events occurred in 5 patients at a dosage of 2.4–2.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and one patient at a dosage of 1.2 mg/kg weekly. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy (grades 1–3) was observed in 14 patients due to microtubule inhibitors. Six patients (4 ovarian cancer; 2 pancreatic cancer) treated with DMOT4039A at 2.4 to 2.8 mg/kg had a PR.

BMS-986148

BMS-986148 is an antibody-drug conjugate that might be related to MDX-1204, which contains a MAb conjugated to the potent alkylating agent duocarmycin (MED2460) and causes cell death after internalization by target cells [57]. A clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, antitumor activity and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986148 administered alone and in combination with nivolumab in selected patients with mesothelioma, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer. This study aimed to enroll over 400 patients from 12 countries (NCT02341625). Another phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02884726) in Japan has been completed.

LMB-100/ RG7787

LMB-100/ RG7787 is a re-engineered version of a humanized anti-MSLN Fab based on SS1 that is fused to a truncated and deimmunized PE24 moiety with higher activity and less immunogenicity [63]. LMB-100 inhibits protein synthesis [64] and is regulated by the tyrosine kinase DDR1 [65]. The addition of a DDR1 inhibitor resulted in the increased shrinkage of tumor xenografts. The antitumor efficacy of LMB-100 for pancreatic cancer, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and gastric cancer has been proven in preclinical studies [63, 66]. Its combination with actinomycin D [67], Nab-Paclitaxel [68], taxanes [69], and panobinostat [70] enhances its antitumor activity. LMB-100 is currently undergoing clinical testing in combination therapy in patients with MSLN-positive malignancies.

BAY2287411

BAY2287411, a thorium-227-labeled antibody-chelator conjugate, was administered to patients with tumors known to express MSLN to evaluate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, PK, anti-tumor activity and recommended dose for further clinical development (NCT03507452). This phase 1 study started in June 2018. More than 200 participants may eventually be enrolled with nonrandomized allocation. A recent study demonstrated that the combination of BAY2287411 with the damage response inhibitors ATRi and PARPi resulted in synergistic activity and increased anti-tumor efficacy [71].

HPN536

HPN536 is the most recent MSLN-targeting antibody-based drug that is currently in clinical trials. It is a MSLN-targeting TriTAC and includes three domains: 1. an anti-MSLN domain that binds to MSLN-positive cells; 2. an anti-albumin domain antibody that extends its half-life; 3. an anti-CD3ε scFv that engages T cells [72]. HPN536 activates T cells in the presence of MSLN and directs T cells to kill cells expressing MSLN. It has a half-life of approximately 5 days and is well tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys subjected to a single treatment at a 10 mg/kg dosage. NCI-H292 tumor growth was impeded in mice implanted with human PBMCs and treated with HPN536. The associated phase 1/2a trial (NCT03872206) is a multicenter, open-label study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK and activity of HPN536 in up to 80 patients with advanced cancers associated with MSLN expression.

The short half-life and the immunogenicity of murine-derived antibodies and bacterial toxins have limited the efficacy of antibody-based drugs. To address these issues, novel humanized or fully human anti-MSLN antibodies and toxins with reduced immunogenicity need to be developed. Many studies have attempted to do this. The insertion of a disulfide bond to protect the furin cleavage site of SS1-PE24 improves its serum half-life and decreases its toxicity [73]. A study suggested that the involvement of albumin-binding domains could prolong the half-life and increase antitumor activity [74]. In addition, the removal of B- and T-cell epitopes from RIT led to greatly reduced antigenicity [75, 76]. Fully human antibodies were also developed and verified in preclinical studies [77, 78].

Vaccines

Cancer vaccines are designed to induce tumor-specific immune responses in the host. A large number of studies have tested multiple platforms, including peptides, proteins, antigen presenting cells, tumor cells, and viral vectors [79]. The bacterium-based vaccine CRS-207, which uses a live-attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) strain ANZ-100 (Lm ΔactA/ΔinlB) engineered to express human MSLN, has been used to treat MSLN-positive cancers in clinical trials [59]. CRS-207 was evaluated in 17 subjects (7 with pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDA), 5 with mesothelioma, 3 with NSCLC, and 2 with ovarian cancer) in a dose-escalation study with up to 4 doses (NCT00585845). CRS-207 was well tolerated at the top dose (1 × 109 cfu). Immune activation was confirmed by a multiplexed serum cytokine assay and phenotype analysis. Thirty-seven percent of subjects survived ≥15 months, but none of them had a PR. CRS-207 has also been used in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide and another vaccine, GVAX pancreas, which is derived from an irradiated allogeneic GM-CSF secreting cell line, in patients with metastatic PDA (NCT01417000) [58]. Sixty-one patients who received CRS-207 and Cy/GVAX had longer overall survival (6.1 months) than 29 patients treated with Cy/GVAX alone (3.9 months). A follow-up study to test the immune responses and efficacy produced by the combination of CRS-207 and the GVAX pancreas vaccine (with cyclophosphamide) compared to those produced by chemotherapy or CRS-207 alone in adults with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was conducted. The overall survival was 3.8 months for the cohort treated with Cy/GVAX + CRS-207, 5.4 months for the cohort treated with CRS-207 alone, and 4.6 months for the cohort treated with chemotherapy (NCT02004262).

JNJ-64041757 (previously referred to as ADU-214) is a live-attenuated, double-deleted (LADD) Listeria monocytogenes strain used as a potential treatment for NSCLC that was engineered by Aduro Biotech, Inc. in 2014. However, two clinical trials that attempted to evaluate its efficacy alone or in combination with nivolumab were both terminated due to a lack of clinical benefit (NCT02592967 and NCT03371381). A neoantigen DNA vaccine strategy is currently being evaluated in pancreatic cancer patients following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03122106). Neoantigen DNA vaccines incorporate prioritized neoantigens, and personalized MSLN epitopes will be administered intramuscularly using the TDS-IM system. The estimated completion date of this study is March 2022.

Despite the fact that there are few clinical trials of MSLN-targeted vaccines and the results of these trials have been disappointing, many preclinical studies are still ongoing. One study showed that a cell-based vaccine, Meso-VAX, in combination with the adeno-associated virus (AAV)-IL-12 increased the number of MSLN-specific T cells and the levels of anti-MSLN Abs and enhanced tumor clearance activity in mice [80]. The anti-tumor effects of the chimeric DNA vaccine CTGF/MSLN (containing an antigen-specific connective tissue growth factor linked to with MSLN) in combination with an anti-CD40 Ab and the TLR 3 ligand poly(I:C), which are essential adjuvants for DC maturation, the immuno-modulator EGCG and Meso-VAX in combination with (AAV)-IL-12 were proven [81]. Recently, a MSLN-derived epitope peptide restricted to HLA-A*2402 was shown to be effective in inducing peptide-specific CTLs. The MSLN-10-5 peptide-specific CTL clones showed specific cytotoxic activity against HLA-A*2402-positive MSLN-expressing pancreatic cancer cells, indicating that the peptide-based vaccine is a promising candidate for therapy [82].

CAR-T therapy

The development of MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are designed to target cell surface antigens without MHC restriction. Therefore, the CAR-T cells could be broadly applicable in HLA-diverse allogeneic recipients. The CARs are recombinant receptors commonly consisting of an extracellular antigen recognition domain, which is generally derived from the single chain variable fragment (scFv) of antibodies, transmembrane domains that function as anchors in the cytoplasmic membrane, and an intracellular domain that transmits T cell activation signals. The first-generation CARs consisted of only one intracellular signaling domain, which was usually a CD3z chain, and this was sufficient to initiate T cell activation but produced only short-term proliferative activity and a low level of cytotoxicity. The second-generation CARs had greatly improved potency through the incorporation of another costimulatory molecule (CD28, 4-1BB, or OX40) [83,84,85]. Furthermore, our team and other groups demonstrated that the third-generation MSLN-targeting CARs containing two costimulatory domains (CD28, 4-1BB, TLR2, or DAP10) and a hinge domain were superior in terms of cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, persistence and tumor suppression efficacy [86,87,88,89]. The latest iteration, the fourth-generation CARs, can additionally secrete cytokines or other effector molecules, such as IL-12, IL-15, IL-7, CCL19, or αPD-1, to regulate the immune microenvironment [90,91,92,93,94,95].

Because MSLN is a highly specific antigen in several cancers, CAR-T therapy has been proven to be a promising strategy for the treatment of these cancers. TNBC is intractable due to the lack of an effective targeted therapy. The presence of MSLN in 67% of TNBCs provides a candidate target for CAR-T therapy of TNBC [23]. MSLN-directed CAR-T cells were demonstrated to induce cytotoxicity in MSLN-expressing pancreatic cancer cells in vivo depending on the MSLN expression level to delay tumor growth and eliminate lung metastases in vivo [96, 97]. Our team previously demonstrated that MSLN was also a promising target for treating lung cancer and gastric cancer [28, 87]. We proved that third-generation CAR-T could effectively delay tumor growth or even completely eradicate subcutaneous tumors, eliminate pulmonary and intraperitoneal metastases of gastric cancer cells in mice and prolong survival. Similarly, the effectiveness of this targeted strategy has also been proven in bile duct carcinoma [98] and ovarian cancer [99].

CAR-T cells are generally produced via lentivirus transduction. The CAR genes are cloned into lentiviral vectors and subsequently integrated into the host T cell genome, allowing for the stable and permanent expression of the CAR. This method has been widely adopted because it is simple and reliable. Another method used for the stable integration of the CAR gene into the T cell genome is the piggyBac transposon system. The piggyBac transposon system is an efficient nonviral method for the genomic engineering of mammalian cells, including pluripotent stem cells and human T lymphocytes, and its advantages include a large cargo capacity, nonrandom integration and the elimination of virus-associated issues [100]. MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells engineered by the piggyBac transposon system have been proven to be cytotoxic to pancreatic cancer cells [97] and bile duct carcinoma cells [98]. To avoid the risks associated with genomic integration, several studies have proposed that CAR-T cells targeting MSLN could be generated by RNA electroporation [99, 101]. The expression of the CAR was shown to be detectable 7 days after electroporation. Multiple injections of RNA-electroporated CAR T cells reduced tumor volumes in mice. However, the CAR is transiently expressed and will be completely eliminated over time as a result of the degradation of the CAR mRNA [99, 101].

CAR-T cells are generally administered by systemic delivery, such as intravenous injection. However, systemically delivered T cells need to pass through the barriers created by multiple tissues before infiltrating into tumors. Therefore, inefficient T cell infiltration and short persistence are common obstacles for solid tumor therapy by CAR-T. A recent preclinical study revealed that regional intrapleural administration of CAR T cells resulted in more robust proliferation and increased antitumor efficacy with a long persistence of 200 days in an orthotopic MPM model compared with that induced by systemically infused T cells [102]. Similarly, we found that the regional peritumoral delivery of CAR-T cells produced enhanced tumor clearance in a subcutaneous GC model [28]. The subcutaneous tumors in some mice in the peritumoral delivery group were completely eliminated, whereas a moderate effect was observed in the group treated with intravenously injected CAR-T cells. In addition, we found improved T cell infiltration in tumors in the peritumoral delivery group. Overall, regional delivery might enhance the therapeutic effects, but this requires verification in clinical trials. To enhance T cell infiltration, the MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells were also engineered to express CCR2b, a chemokine receptor that is minimally expressed on T cells, while the CCR2b ligand CCL2 is highly secreted by MPM [103]. The overexpression of CCR2b enhanced CAR-T cell cytotoxicity in tumor cells and chemotaxis in response to CCL2 in vitro. A 12.5-fold increase in T cell infiltration into tumors and significantly enhanced tumor clearance were observed in mice [103].

The tumor immune microenvironment is crucial in regulating T cell immunosurveillance. The upregulation of PD-L1 in tumor cells and the expression of inhibitory receptors, including PD1, CTLA-4, TIM3, LAG3, and 2B4, on T cells always reduces the infiltration of T cells into tumors and induces T cell exhaustion [95]. Recent preclinical studies showed that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption could rescue MSLN-targeted CAR-T cell responses in vivo [104, 105]. Based on this, CAR-T cells engineered to express immune checkpoint antibodies (CTLA-4 and PD-1) or to knock out PD-1 are being evaluated in clinical trials [95] (NCT03030001, NCT03182803, NCT03615313, NCT03545815, and NCT03747965). In addition to being restricted by immune checkpoint molecules, the function of T cells is regulated by a variety of cytokines. The depletion of IL-10 with a blocking antibody or via the elevation of TNF-α and IL-2 levels by an oncolytic adenovirus enhanced and prolonged the functioning of MSLN-redirected CAR-T cells [106, 107].

MSLN-redirected CAR-T cells are also associated with the “on target, off tumor” issue. Despite the fact that no extensive or severe on-target toxicity against normal tissues has been observed, a great deal of effort has been made to avoid this problem. A promising strategy for this involves the achievement of accurate tumor recognition by combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits, while bispecific antibodies have proven more specific and potent [108]. Another potential approach is to physically separate the CD3ζ module from the costimulation module by using two distinct CARs specific for different antigens [109,110,111]. This structural design allows for comparable anticancer activity and persistence with the second-generation CAR-T cells only encounter both antigens. Another strategy is to engineer T cells with a synthetic Notch receptor that contains the core regulatory domain derived from the signaling receptor Notch [112]. An extracellular antigen recognition domain and a synthetic intracellular transcriptional domain were designed to replace the native Notch domain. Upon binding to the first antigen, the synthetic Notch receptor is cleaved and releases the intracellular transcriptional domain to activate the expression of the CAR, which recognizes the second antigen.

We have noted that the immunogenicity of murine-derived antibodies would limit their therapeutic effects in humans. Similarly, the use of a CAR of murine origin also limited the persistence of CAR-T cells in recipients. The development of a CAR with a human-derived scFv is needed to address this issue. A fully human MSLN-targeting CAR (P4) was constructed and shown to be enhanced in terms of cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity in vitro and anti-tumor activity in vivo [113]. P4 CAR-T cells were shown to be able to lyse MSLN-positive tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, even in the presence of soluble MSLN protein.

Clinical trials of MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells

The majority of newly registered clinical trials targeting MSLN in the past 3 years are related to CAR-T therapy. CAR-T therapy has been a potent strategy for treating MSLN-expressing tumors [86, 114]. CAR design has been greatly optimized to enhance its performance [85]. The safety, effects and the maximum tolerated dose of MSLN-targeting CAR-T cell therapy are currently being evaluated in multiple phase 1/2 clinical trials (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical trials for MSLN-targeted therapies based on CAR-T therapy
Full size table

In a preclinical study, MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells generated by the transfection of mRNA showed robust antitumor activity and the transient expression of the CAR. mRNA-based CAR-T cells (SS1–4-1BB CAR) were proven to be well tolerated after multiple intravenous or intratumoral infusions (NCT01355965) [115, 116]. A confirmed partial response was observed in patients with MPM or PDA. The serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including MIP-1β, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-6, and IL-17, were transiently elevated after each infusion of CAR-T cells [115]. CAR-T cells were detected in tumors with reduced CAR transcripts several days after administration. Notably, MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells were able to lyse primary tumor cells and elicit a systemic antitumor immune response by inducing epitope spreading [116].

In another recent phase 1 clinical trial, 6 patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic PDAC were intravenously administered autologous MSLN-targeting CAR-T cells 3 times weekly for 3 weeks [117]. Two patients had stable disease with PFS of 3.8 and 5.4 months. A decrease in MSLN expression by 69.2% in one patient was confirmed by biopsy. None of the 6 patients experienced cytokine release syndrome or neurological symptoms. Noteworthily, no evident on-target/off-tumor toxicity against normal tissues was observed in these patients [116, 117]. However, in addition to the short life span of the CAR, another issue that might limit its potency is the production of human anti-CAR antibodies [115,116,117]. An anaphylactic response reported in one patient was attributed to the high production of IgE antibodies specific to the CAR [115]. This suggests that a fully human anti-MSLN scFv is urgently needed for clinical use. Interestingly, a clinical trial that aims to impede the production of antibodies via the depletion of B cells by CD19-targeting CAR-T cells has been initiated (NCT03497819). This clinical trial is active but is not recruiting yet.

Regional delivery was proven to enhance T cell proliferation, persistence and function in mice. Because of this, regional delivery was applied to the clinical treatment of patients. CAR-T cells were administered intrapleurally, intratumorally, or by vascular interventional mediated injection (NCT02414269, NCT02706782, NCT02959151, NCT03267173, and NCT03198052). We still await the publication of the clinical outcomes to determine the importance of regional delivery in the clinic.

CAR-T therapy is always accompanied by cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity due to the excessive immune activation of CAR-T or non-CAR-T cells, and the severity of this is associated with disease burden, the CAR-T cell dose, high-intensity lymphodepletion and preexisting endothelial activation [118]. To decrease the CAR-T-induced side effects, debulking chemotherapy is recommended to reduce tumor burden and the subsequent CAR-T dose, and tocilizumab could be used to prevent severe CRS in the clinic [118]. To enhance the safety of CAR-T therapy and controllably eliminate CAR-T cells when SAEs occur or tumors are eliminated, inducible suicide genes, including iCaspase-9, HSV-TK or EGFRΔ, could co-transduced with the CAR genes [25]. Exposure to a synthetic dimerizing drug would induce the dimerization of iCaspase-9 and lead to cell apoptosis. This inducible T-cell safety switch involving iCaspase-9 has been proven to eliminate over 90% of modified T cells within 30 min [119]. A MSLN-targeting CAR-T therapy trial involving the use of iCaspase-9 is currently recruiting (NCT03747965).

Conclusions

The expression pattern of MSLN provides an exciting opportunity for its use in targeted therapy in various types of malignant tumors, including pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, TNBC and gastric cancer. To date, antibody-based drugs have been effective in inhibiting cancer progression and show acceptable “on target, off tumor” toxicity, while vaccines have showed moderate effects. The great improvements in CAR-T design allows them to be a promising therapeutic strategy to treat MSLN-expressing tumors. The immunogenicity of drugs and CAR-T cells, the low level of T cell infiltration into tumors and the high level of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment are obstacles that need to be overcome. The combined use with checkpoint inhibitors as well as additional strategies to reduce drug resistance and optimize delivery regimens might show promise in the future.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADCC:

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity

ADCP:

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis

cfu:

Colony forming units

CRS:

Cytokine release syndrome

DHAEs:

Drug hypersensitivity adverse events

DLTs:

Dose-limiting toxicities

G-CSF:

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

GPI:

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol

Lm :

Listeria monocytogenes

MMAE:

Monomethyl auristatin E

MPF:

Megakaryocyte potentiating factor

MPM:

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

MSLN:

Mesothelin

MTD:

Maximum tolerated dose

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PD:

Progressive disease

PDA:

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma

PE:

Pseudomonas exotoxin

PK:

Pharmacokinetics

PLD:

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

PR:

Partial responses

RIT:

Recombination immunotoxin

scFv:

Single chain variable fragment

SD:

Stable disease

SMRP:

Soluble MSLN-related protein

TNBC:

Triple negative breast cancer

References

  1. 1.

    Yamaguchi N, Hattori K, Oh-eda M, Kojima T, Imai N, Ochi N. A novel cytokine exhibiting megakaryocyte potentiating activity from a human pancreatic tumor cell line HPC-Y5. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(2):805–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chang K, Pastan I, Willingham MC. Isolation and characterization of a monoclonal antibody, K1, reactive with ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. Int J Cancer. 1992;50(3):373–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ordonez NG. Application of mesothelin immunostaining in tumor diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(11):1418–28.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bera TK, Pastan I. Mesothelin is not required for normal mouse development or reproduction. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(8):2902–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Servais EL, Colovos C, Rodriguez L, Bograd AJ, Nitadori J, Sima C, Rusch VW, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Mesothelin overexpression promotes mesothelioma cell invasion and MMP-9 secretion in an orthotopic mouse model and in epithelioid pleural mesothelioma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(9):2478–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rump A, Morikawa Y, Tanaka M, Minami S, Umesaki N, Takeuchi M, Miyajima A. Binding of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 to mesothelin mediates cell adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(10):9190–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gubbels JA, Belisle J, Onda M, Rancourt C, Migneault M, Ho M, Bera TK, Connor J, Sathyanarayana BK, Lee B, Pastan I, Patankar MS. Mesothelin-MUC16 binding is a high affinity, N-glycan dependent interaction that facilitates peritoneal metastasis of ovarian tumors. Mol Cancer. 2006;5(1):50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Coelho R, Marcos-Silva L, Ricardo S, Ponte F, Costa A, Lopes JM, David L. Peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer: role of MUC16-mesothelin interaction and implications for treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(2):177–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen SH, Hung WC, Wang P, Paul C, Konstantopoulos K. Mesothelin binding to CA125/MUC16 promotes pancreatic cancer cell motility and invasion via MMP-7 activation. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1870.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bharadwaj U, Marin-Muller C, Li M, Chen C, Yao Q. Mesothelin confers pancreatic cancer cell resistance to TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis through Akt/PI3K/NF-kappaB activation and IL-6/Mcl-1 overexpression. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kachala SS, Bograd AJ, Villena-Vargas J, Suzuki K, Servais EL, Kadota K, Chou J, Sima CS, Vertes E, Rusch VW, Travis WD, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Mesothelin overexpression is a marker of tumor aggressiveness and is associated with reduced recurrence-free and overall survival in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(4):1020–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tozbikian G, Brogi E, Kadota K, Catalano J, Akram M, Patil S, Ho AY, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B, Norton L, Adusumilli PS, Wen HY. Mesothelin expression in triple negative breast carcinomas correlates significantly with basal-like phenotype, distant metastases and decreased survival. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114900.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sathyanarayana BK, Hahn Y, Patankar MS, Pastan I, Lee B. Mesothelin, Stereocilin, and Otoancorin are predicted to have superhelical structures with ARM-type repeats. BMC Struct Biol. 2009;9:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ma J, Tang WK, Esser L, Pastan I, Xia D. Characterization of crystals of an antibody-recognition fragment of the cancer differentiation antigen mesothelin in complex with the therapeutic antibody MORAb-009. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2012;68(Pt 8):950–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chang K, Pastan I. Molecular cloning of mesothelin, a differentiation antigen present on mesothelium, mesotheliomas, and ovarian cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(1):136–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang K, Pai LH, Pass H, Pogrebniak HW, Tsao MS, Pastan I, Willingham MC. Monoclonal antibody K1 reacts with epithelial mesothelioma but not with lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(3):259–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ordonez NG. Value of mesothelin immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Mod Pathol. 2003;16(3):192–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Expression of calretinin, thrombomodulin, keratin 5, and mesothelin in lung carcinomas of different types: an immunohistochemical analysis of 596 tumors in comparison with epithelioid mesotheliomas of the pleura. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(2):150–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Argani P, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Ryu B, Rosty C, Goggins M, Wilentz RE, Murugesan SR, Leach SD, Jaffee E, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Kern SE, Hruban RH. Mesothelin is overexpressed in the vast majority of ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas: identification of a new pancreatic cancer marker by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(12):3862–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hassan R, Laszik ZG, Lerner M, Raffeld M, Postier R, Brackett D. Mesothelin is overexpressed in pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas but not in normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124(6):838–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    O'Hara MH, Stashwick C, Plesa G, Tanyi JL. Overcoming barriers of car T-cell therapy in patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers. Immunotherapy. 2017;9(9):767–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chang K, Pastan I, Willingham MC. Frequent expression of the tumor antigen CAK1 in squamous-cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1992;51(4):548–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tchou J, Wang LC, Selven B, Zhang H, Conejo-Garcia J, Borghaei H, Kalos M, Vondeheide RH, Albelda SM, June CH, Zhang PJ. Mesothelin, a novel immunotherapy target for triple negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(2):799–804.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rizk NP, Servais EL, Tang LH, Sima CS, Gerdes H, Fleisher M, Rusch VW, Adusumilli PS. Tissue and serum mesothelin are potential markers of neoplastic progression in Barrett's associated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21(3):482–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Morello A, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Mesothelin-targeted CARs: driving T cells to solid tumors. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(2):133–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pastan I, Hassan R. Discovery of mesothelin and exploiting it as a target for immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):2907–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Han SH, Joo M, Kim H, Chang S. Mesothelin expression in gastric adenocarcinoma and its relation to clinical outcomes. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(2):122–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lv J, Zhao R, Wu D, Zheng D, Wu Z, Shi J, Wei X, Wu Q, Long Y, Lin S, Wang S, Wang Z, Li Y, Chen Y, He Q, Chen S, Yao H, Liu Z, Tang Z, Yao Y, Pei D, Liu P, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Cui S, Chen R, Li P. Mesothelin is a target of chimeric antigen receptor T cells for treating gastric cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cheng WF, Huang CY, Chang MC, Hu YH, Chiang YC, Chen YL, Hsieh CY, Chen CA. High mesothelin correlates with chemoresistance and poor survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(7):1144–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kawamata F, Kamachi H, Einama T, Homma S, Tahara M, Miyazaki M, Tanaka S, Kamiyama T, Nishihara H, Taketomi A, Todo S. Intracellular localization of mesothelin predicts patient prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Int J Oncol. 2012;41(6):2109–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nomura R, Fujii H, Abe M, Sugo H, Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S, Hino O. Mesothelin expression is a prognostic factor in cholangiocellular carcinoma. Int Surg. 2013;98(2):164–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thomas A, Chen Y, Steinberg SM, Luo J, Pack S, Raffeld M, Abdullaev Z, Alewine C, Rajan A, Giaccone G, Pastan I, Miettinen M, Hassan R. High mesothelin expression in advanced lung adenocarcinoma is associated with KRAS mutations and a poor prognosis. Oncotarget. 2015;6(13):11694–703.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li YR, Xian RR, Ziober A, Conejo-Garcia J, Perales-Puchalt A, June CH, Zhang PJ, Tchou J. Mesothelin expression is associated with poor outcomes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147(3):675–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Winter JM, Tang LH, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Brody JR, Rocha FG, Jia X, Qin LX, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, O'Reilly EM, Allen PJ. A novel survival-based tissue microarray of pancreatic cancer validates MUC1 and mesothelin as biomarkers. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40157.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shimizu A, Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Kitahata Y, Nakamura Y, Noda T, Yokoyama S, Yamaue H. Coexpression of MUC16 and mesothelin is related to the invasion process in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(4):739–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hassan R, Thomas A, Alewine C, Le DT, Jaffee EM, Pastan I. Mesothelin immunotherapy for Cancer: ready for prime time? J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4171–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cristaudo A, Bonotti A, Guglielmi G, Fallahi P, Foddis R. Serum mesothelin and other biomarkers: what have we learned in the last decade? J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 2):S353–s359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sapede C, Gauvrit A, Barbieux I, Padieu M, Cellerin L, Sagan C, Scherpereel A, Dabouis G, Gregoire M. Aberrant splicing and protease involvement in mesothelin release from epithelioid mesothelioma cells. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(3):590–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Robinson BW, Creaney J, Lake R, Nowak A, Musk AW, de Klerk N, Winzell P, Hellstrom KE, Hellstrom I. Mesothelin-family proteins and diagnosis of mesothelioma. Lancet. 2003;362(9396):1612–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bast RC Jr. Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10 Suppl):200s–5s.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hassan R, Wu C, Brechbiel MW, Margulies I, Kreitman RJ, Pastan I. 111Indium-labeled monoclonal antibody K1: biodistribution study in nude mice bearing a human carcinoma xenograft expressing mesothelin. Int J Cancer. 1999;80(4):559–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hassan R, Viner JL, Wang QC, Margulies I, Kreitman RJ, Pastan I. Anti-tumor activity of K1-LysPE38QQR, an immunotoxin targeting mesothelin, a cell-surface antigen overexpressed in ovarian cancer and malignant mesothelioma. J Immunother. 2000;23(4):473–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chowdhury PS, Viner JL, Beers R, Pastan I. Isolation of a high-affinity stable single-chain Fv specific for mesothelin from DNA-immunized mice by phage display and construction of a recombinant immunotoxin with anti-tumor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(2):669–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chowdhury PS, Pastan I. Improving antibody affinity by mimicking somatic hypermutation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(6):568–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hilliard TS. The Impact of Mesothelin in the Ovarian Cancer Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(9):277.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hassan R, Sharon E, Thomas A, Zhang J, Ling A, Miettinen M, Kreitman RJ, Steinberg SM, Hollevoet K, Pastan I. Phase 1 study of the antimesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin for front-line therapy of pleural mesothelioma and correlation of tumor response with serum mesothelin, megakaryocyte potentiating factor, and cancer antigen 125. Cancer. 2014;120(21):3311–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hassan R, Miller AC, Sharon E, Thomas A, Reynolds JC, Ling A, Kreitman RJ, Miettinen MM, Steinberg SM, Fowler DH, Pastan I. Major cancer regressions in mesothelioma after treatment with an anti-mesothelin immunotoxin and immune suppression. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(208):208ra147.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hassan R, Bullock S, Premkumar A, Kreitman RJ, Kindler H, Willingham MC, Pastan I. Phase I study of SS1P, a recombinant anti-mesothelin immunotoxin given as a bolus I.V. infusion to patients with mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(17):5144–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kreitman RJ, Hassan R, Fitzgerald DJ, Pastan I. Phase I trial of continuous infusion anti-mesothelin recombinant immunotoxin SS1P. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(16):5274–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gupta A, Hussein Z, Hassan R, Wustner J, Maltzman JD, Wallin BA. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of amatuximab, an anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody, in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and its application in dose selection. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(4):733–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fujisaka Y, Kurata T, Tanaka K, Kudo T, Okamoto K, Tsurutani J, Kaneda H, Okamoto I, Namiki M, Kitamura C, Nakagawa K. Phase I study of amatuximab, a novel monoclonal antibody to mesothelin, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig New Drugs. 2015;33(2):380–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hassan R, Cohen SJ, Phillips M, Pastan I, Sharon E, Kelly RJ, Schweizer C, Weil S, Laheru D. Phase I clinical trial of the chimeric anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody MORAb-009 in patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(24):6132–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hassan R, Schweizer C, Lu KF, Schuler B, Remaley AT, Weil SC, Pastan I. Inhibition of mesothelin-CA-125 interaction in patients with mesothelioma by the anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody MORAb-009: implications for cancer therapy. Lung Cancer. 2010;68(3):455–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hassan R, Kindler HL, Jahan T, Bazhenova L, Reck M, Thomas A, Pastan I, Parno J, O'Shannessy DJ, Fatato P, Maltzman JD, Wallin BA. Phase II clinical trial of amatuximab, a chimeric antimesothelin antibody with pemetrexed and cisplatin in advanced unresectable pleural mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):5927–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Quanz M, Hagemann UB, Zitzmann-Kolbe S, Stelte-Ludwig B, Golfier S, Elbi C, Mumberg D, Ziegelbauer K, Schatz CA. Anetumab ravtansine inhibits tumor growth and shows additive effect in combination with targeted agents and chemotherapy in mesothelin-expressing human ovarian cancer models. Oncotarget. 2018;9(75):34103–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Golfier S, Kopitz C, Kahnert A, Heisler I, Schatz CA, Stelte-Ludwig B, Mayer-Bartschmid A, Unterschemmann K, Bruder S, Linden L, Harrenga A, Hauff P, Scholle FD, Muller-Tiemann B, Kreft B, Ziegelbauer K. Anetumab ravtansine: a novel mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate cures tumors with heterogeneous target expression favored by bystander effect. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(6):1537–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Baldo P, Cecco S. Amatuximab and novel agents targeting mesothelin for solid tumors. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:5337–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Le DT, Wang-Gillam A, Picozzi V, Greten TF, Crocenzi T, Springett G, Morse M, Zeh H, Cohen D, Fine RL, Onners B, Uram JN, Laheru DA, Lutz ER, Solt S, Murphy AL, Skoble J, Lemmens E, Grous J, Dubensky T Jr, Brockstedt DG, Jaffee EM. Safety and survival with GVAX pancreas prime and Listeria monocytogenes-expressing mesothelin (CRS-207) boost vaccines for metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(12):1325–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Le DT, Brockstedt DG, Nir-Paz R, Hampl J, Mathur S, Nemunaitis J, Sterman DH, Hassan R, Lutz E, Moyer B, Giedlin M, Louis JL, Sugar EA, Pons A, Cox AL, Levine J, Murphy AL, Illei P, Dubensky TW Jr, Eiden JE, Jaffee EM, Laheru DA. A live-attenuated Listeria vaccine (ANZ-100) and a live-attenuated Listeria vaccine expressing mesothelin (CRS-207) for advanced cancers: phase I studies of safety and immune induction. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(3):858–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lindenberg L, Thomas A, Adler S, Mena E, Kurdziel K, Maltzman J, Wallin B, Hoffman K, Pastan I, Paik CH, Choyke P, Hassan R. Safety and biodistribution of 111In-amatuximab in patients with mesothelin expressing cancers using single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging. Oncotarget. 2015;6(6):4496–504.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Scales SJ, Gupta N, Pacheco G, Firestein R, French DM, Koeppen H, Rangell L, Barry-Hamilton V, Luis E, Chuh J, Zhang Y, Ingle GS, Fourie-O'Donohue A, Kozak KR, Ross S, Dennis MS, Spencer SD. An antimesothelin-monomethyl auristatin e conjugate with potent antitumor activity in ovarian, pancreatic, and mesothelioma models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(11):2630–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Weekes CD, Lamberts LE, Borad MJ, Voortman J, McWilliams RR, Diamond JR, de Vries EG, Verheul HM, Lieu CH, Kim GP, Wang Y, Scales SJ, Samineni D, Brunstein F, Choi Y, Maslyar DJ, Colon-Otero G. Phase I study of DMOT4039A, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Mesothelin, in patients with Unresectable pancreatic or platinum-resistant ovarian Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(3):439–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hollevoet K, Mason-Osann E, Liu XF, Imhof-Jung S, Niederfellner G, Pastan I. In vitro and in vivo activity of the low-immunogenic antimesothelin immunotoxin RG7787 in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(8):2040–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    El-Behaedi S, Landsman R, Rudloff M, Kolyvas E, Albalawy R, Zhang X, Bera T, Collins K, Kozlov S, Alewine C. Protein Synthesis Inhibition Activity of Mesothelin Targeting Immunotoxin LMB-100 Decreases Concentrations of Oncogenic Signaling Molecules and Secreted Growth Factors. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(11):447.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ali-Rahmani F, FitzGerald DJ, Martin S, Patel P, Prunotto M, Ormanoglu P, Thomas C, Pastan I. Anticancer effects of Mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin therapy are regulated by tyrosine kinase DDR1. Cancer Res. 2016;76(6):1560–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Alewine C, Xiang L, Yamori T, Niederfellner G, Bosslet K, Pastan I. Efficacy of RG7787, a next-generation mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin, against triple-negative breast and gastric cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(11):2653–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Liu XF, Xiang L, Zhou Q, Carralot JP, Prunotto M, Niederfellner G, Pastan I. Actinomycin D enhances killing of cancer cells by immunotoxin RG7787 through activation of the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(38):10666–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Zhang J, Khanna S, Jiang Q, Alewine C, Miettinen M, Pastan I, Hassan R. Efficacy of anti-mesothelin immunotoxin RG7787 plus nab-paclitaxel against mesothelioma patient-derived xenografts and Mesothelin as a biomarker of tumor response. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(6):1564–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kolyvas E, Rudloff M, Poruchynsky M, Landsman R, Hollevoet K, Venzon D, Alewine C. Mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin RG7787 has synergistic anti-tumor activity when combined with taxanes. Oncotarget. 2017;8(6):9189–99.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Liu XF, Zhou Q, Hassan R, Pastan I. Panbinostat decreases cFLIP and enhances killing of cancer cells by immunotoxin LMB-100 by stimulating the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(50):87307–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wickstroem K, Hagemann UB, Cruciani V, Wengner AM, Kristian A, Ellingsen C, Siemeister G, Bjerke R, Karlsson J, Ryan OB, Linden L, Mumberg D, Ziegelbauer K, Cuthbertson AS. Synergistic effect of a Mesothelin targeted Thorium-227 conjugate in combination with DNA damage response inhibitors in ovarian Cancer xenograft models. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850485. http://jnm.snmjournals.org/citmgr?gca=jnumed%3Bjnumed.118.223701v1.

  72. 72.

    Richard Austin WA, Patrick A. Baeuerle, Adrie Jones, Susan D. Jones, Che-Leung Law, Kathryn Kwant, Bryan Lemon, Anna Muchnik, Kenneth Sexton, Laurie Tatalick, Holger Wesche, Timothy Yu, Harpoon Therapeutics.: HPN536, a T cell-engaging, Mesothelin/CD3-specific TriTAC for the treatment of solid tumors. 2018. https://www.harpoontx.com/file.cfm/43/docs/AACR_2018_Poster_HPN536.pdf.

  73. 73.

    Kaplan G, Lee F, Onda M, Kolyvas E, Bhardwaj G, Baker D, Pastan I. Protection of the Furin Cleavage Site in Low-Toxicity Immunotoxins Based on Pseudomonas Exotoxin A. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(8):217.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Wei J, Bera TK, Liu XF, Zhou Q, Onda M, Ho M, Tai CH, Pastan I. Recombinant immunotoxins with albumin-binding domains have long half-lives and high antitumor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(15):E3501–e3508.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Mazor R, Onda M, Park D, Addissie S, Xiang L, Zhang J, Hassan R, Pastan I. Dual B- and T-cell de-immunization of recombinant immunotoxin targeting mesothelin with high cytotoxic activity. Oncotarget. 2016;7(21):29916–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mazor R, Zhang J, Xiang L, Addissie S, Awuah P, Beers R, Hassan R, Pastan I. Recombinant immunotoxin with T-cell epitope mutations that greatly reduce immunogenicity for treatment of Mesothelin-expressing tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14(12):2789–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Feng Y, Xiao X, Zhu Z, Streaker E, Ho M, Pastan I, Dimitrov DS. A novel human monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to mesothelin-expressing cells and kills them by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(5):1113–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Ho M, Feng M, Fisher RJ, Rader C, Pastan I. A novel high-affinity human monoclonal antibody to mesothelin. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(9):2020–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Butterfield LH. Cancer vaccines. Bmj. 2015;350:h988.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Chang MC, Chen YL, Chiang YC, Chen TC, Tang YC, Chen CA, Sun WZ, Cheng WF. Mesothelin-specific cell-based vaccine generates antigen-specific immunity and potent antitumor effects by combining with IL-12 immunomodulator. Gene Ther. 2016;23(1):38–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Chen YL, Chang MC, Chiang YC, Lin HW, Sun NY, Chen CA, Sun WZ, Cheng WF. Immuno-modulators enhance antigen-specific immunity and anti-tumor effects of mesothelin-specific chimeric DNA vaccine through promoting DC maturation. Cancer Lett. 2018;425:152–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Tsukagoshi M, Wada S, Hirono S, Yoshida S, Yada E, Sasada T, Shirabe K, Kuwano H, Yamaue H. Identification of a novel HLA-A24-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope peptide derived from mesothelin in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(59):31448–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Riviere I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(4):388–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Zhang C, Liu J, Zhong JF, Zhang X. Engineering CAR-T cells. Biomark Res. 2017;5:22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wang Z, Wu Z, Liu Y, Han W. New development in CAR-T cell therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Yu S, Li A, Liu Q, Li T, Yuan X, Han X, Wu K. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells: a novel therapy for solid tumors. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lai Y, Weng J, Wei X, Qin L, Lai P, Zhao R, Jiang Z, Li B, Lin S, Wang S, Wu Q, Tang Z, Liu P, Pei D, Yao Y, Du X, Li P. Toll-like receptor 2 costimulation potentiates the antitumor efficacy of CAR T cells. Leukemia. 2018;32(3):801–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Zhao R, Cheng L, Jiang Z, Wei X, Li B, Wu Q, Wang S, Lin S, Long Y, Zhang X, Wu Y, Du X, Pei D, Liu P, Li Y, Cui S, Yao Y, Li P. DNAX-activating protein 10 co-stimulation enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8(1):e1509173.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Qin L, Lai Y, Zhao R, Wei X, Weng J, Lai P, Li B, Lin S, Wang S, Wu Q, Liang Q, Li Y, Zhang X, Wu Y, Liu P, Yao Y, Pei D, Du X, Li P. Incorporation of a hinge domain improves the expansion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Adachi K, Kano Y, Nagai T, Okuyama N, Sakoda Y, Tamada K. IL-7 and CCL19 expression in CAR-T cells improves immune cell infiltration and CAR-T cell survival in the tumor. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(4):346–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Li S, Siriwon N, Zhang X, Yang S, Jin T, He F, Kim YJ, Mac J, Lu Z, Wang S, Han X, Wang P. Enhanced Cancer immunotherapy by chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells engineered to secrete checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6982–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Markley JC, Sadelain M. IL-7 and IL-21 are superior to IL-2 and IL-15 in promoting human T cell-mediated rejection of systemic lymphoma in immunodeficient mice. Blood. 2010;115(17):3508–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Pegram HJ, Lee JC, Hayman EG, Imperato GH, Tedder TF, Sadelain M, Brentjens RJ. Tumor-targeted T cells modified to secrete IL-12 eradicate systemic tumors without need for prior conditioning. Blood. 2012;119(18):4133–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Qin L, Zhao R, Li P. Incorporation of functional elements enhances the antitumor capacity of CAR T cells. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017;6:28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Li J, Li W, Huang K, Zhang Y, Kupfer G, Zhao Q. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy for solid tumors: lessons learned and strategies for moving forward. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Sun Q, Zhou S, Zhao J, Deng C, Teng R, Zhao Y, Chen J, Dong J, Yin M, Bai Y, Deng H, Wen J. Engineered T lymphocytes eliminate lung metastases in models of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(17):13694–705.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    He J, Zhang Z, Lv S, Liu X, Cui L, Jiang D, Zhang Q, Li L, Qin W, Jin H, Qian Q. Engineered CAR T cells targeting mesothelin by piggyBac transposon system for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Cell Immunol. 2018;329:31–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Xu JY, Ye ZL, Jiang DQ, He JC, Ding YM, Li LF, Lv SQ, Wang Y, Jin HJ, Qian QJ. Mesothelin-targeting chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells by piggyBac transposon system suppress the growth of bile duct carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(4):1010428317695949.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Hung CF, Xu X, Li L, Ma Y, Jin Q, Viley A, Allen C, Natarajan P, Shivakumar R, Peshwa MV, Emens LA. Development of anti-human Mesothelin-targeted chimeric antigen receptor messenger RNA-transfected peripheral blood lymphocytes for ovarian Cancer therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(5):614–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Woodard LE, Wilson MH. piggyBac-ing models and new therapeutic strategies. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(9):525–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Zhao Y, Moon E, Carpenito C, Paulos CM, Liu X, Brennan AL, Chew A, Carroll RG, Scholler J, Levine BL, Albelda SM, June CH. Multiple injections of electroporated autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor mediate regression of human disseminated tumor. Cancer Res. 2010;70(22):9053–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Adusumilli PS, Cherkassky L, Villena-Vargas J, Colovos C, Servais E, Plotkin J, Jones DR, Sadelain M. Regional delivery of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell therapy generates potent and long-lasting CD4-dependent tumor immunity. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(261):261ra151.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Moon EK, Carpenito C, Sun J, Wang LC, Kapoor V, Predina J, Powell DJ Jr, Riley JL, June CH, Albelda SM. Expression of a functional CCR2 receptor enhances tumor localization and tumor eradication by retargeted human T cells expressing a mesothelin-specific chimeric antibody receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(14):4719–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Cherkassky L, Morello A, Villena-Vargas J, Feng Y, Dimitrov DS, Jones DR, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):3130–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Hu W, Zi Z, Jin Y, Li G, Shao K, Cai Q, Ma X, Wei F. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances human mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell effector functions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68(3):365–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Batchu RB, Gruzdyn OV, Mahmud EM, Chukr F, Dachepalli R, Manmari SK, Mostafa G, Weaver DW, Gruber SA. Inhibition of Interleukin-10 in the tumor microenvironment can restore mesothelin chimeric antigen receptor T cell activity in pancreatic cancer in vitro. Surgery. 2018;163(3):627–32.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Watanabe K, Luo Y, Da T, Guedan S, Ruella M, Scholler J, Keith B, Young RM, Engels B, Sorsa S, Siurala M, Havunen R, Tahtinen S, Hemminki A, June CH. Pancreatic cancer therapy with combined mesothelin-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cells and cytokine-armed oncolytic adenoviruses. JCI Insight. 2018;3(7):e99573.

  108. 108.

    Zhang X, Yang Y, Fan D, Xiong D. The development of bispecific antibodies and their applications in tumor immune escape. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017;6:12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Lanitis E, Poussin M, Klattenhoff AW, Song D, Sandaltzopoulos R, June CH, Powell DJ Jr. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells with dissociated signaling domains exhibit focused antitumor activity with reduced potential for toxicity in vivo. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(1):43–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Zhang E, Yang P, Gu J, Wu H, Chi X, Liu C, Wang Y, Xue J, Qi W, Sun Q, Zhang S, Hu J, Xu H. Recombination of a dual-CAR-modified T lymphocyte to accurately eliminate pancreatic malignancy. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Zhang E, Gu J, Xue J, Lin C, Liu C, Li M, Hao J, Setrerrahmane S, Chi X, Qi W, Hu J, Xu H. Accurate control of dual-receptor-engineered T cell activity through a bifunctional anti-angiogenic peptide. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Park JS, Lim WA. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits. Cell. 2016;164(4):770–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Lanitis E, Poussin M, Hagemann IS, Coukos G, Sandaltzopoulos R, Scholler N, Powell DJ Jr. Redirected antitumor activity of primary human lymphocytes transduced with a fully human anti-mesothelin chimeric receptor. Mol Ther. 2012;20(3):633–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Liu B, Song Y, Liu D. Clinical trials of CAR-T cells in China. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Maus MV, Haas AR, Beatty GL, Albelda SM, Levine BL, Liu X, Zhao Y, Kalos M, June CH. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can cause anaphylaxis in humans. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Beatty GL, Haas AR, Maus MV, Torigian DA, Soulen MC, Plesa G, Chew A, Zhao Y, Levine BL, Albelda SM, Kalos M, June CH. Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor mRNA-engineered T cells induce anti-tumor activity in solid malignancies. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(2):112–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Beatty GL, O'Hara MH, Lacey SF, Torigian DA, Nazimuddin F, Chen F, Kulikovskaya IM, Soulen MC, McGarvey M, Nelson AM, Gladney WL, Levine BL, Melenhorst JJ, Plesa G, June CH. Activity of Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells against pancreatic carcinoma metastases in a phase 1 trial. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(1):29–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Wang Z, Han W. Biomarkers of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity related to CAR-T cell therapy. Biomark Res. 2018;6:4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Di Stasi A, Tey SK, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, Martinez C, Straathof K, Liu E, Durett AG, Grilley B, Liu H, Cruz CR, Savoldo B, Gee AP, Schindler J, Krance RA, Heslop HE, Spencer DM, Rooney CM, Brenner MK. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(18):1673–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study is supported by Guangzhou science and technology plan project, NO. 201907010042, 201904010473; The National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “Significant New Drugs Development”, No. SQ2018ZX090201; The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDB19030205, No. XDA12050305; Guangdong Provincial Applied Science and Technology Research & Development Program, No. 2016B020237006; Guangdong Special Support Program, NO. 2017TX04R102; Frontier and key technology innovation special grant from the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong province, No. 2015B020227003; Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province: Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No.: 2014A030306028), Doctoral Foundation, No.: 2017A030310381; National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No. 81773301; 81700156; 81870121; 81873847; Frontier Research Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, No. 2018GZR110105003; Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (2017B030314056); Guangzhou Medical University High-level University Construction Research Startup Fund, NO. B195002004013; Research Program of Hefei Institute of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, No. 2019YF001.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, South China Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    Jiang Lv & Peng Li

  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, South China Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    Jiang Lv & Peng Li

  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China

    Jiang Lv

Authors
  1. Jiang Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: JL, PL. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, J., Li, P. Mesothelin as a biomarker for targeted therapy. Biomark Res 7, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-019-0169-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mesothelin
  • Biomarker
  • Targeted therapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • CAR-T

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us