Skip to content

Biomarker Research

Research
Open Access

Prognostic significance of miR-194 in endometrial cancer

  • Haiyan Zhai1,
  • Mihriban Karaayvaz1,
  • Peixin Dong2,
  • Noriaki Sakuragi2 and
  • Jingfang Ju1Email author
Biomarker Research20131:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7771-1-12

©  Zhai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 5 November 2012

Accepted: 4 January 2013

Published: 18 February 2013

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the leading malignant tumor occurring in the female genital tract and some subtypes are highly invasive and metastatic. miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that have a broad impact on cancer progression. In particular, miR-194 regulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) by suppressing the expression of BMI-1 in EC. In this retrospective study, the clinical significance of miR-194 was investigated in archival EC specimens. We extracted total RNA from thirty-two EC samples and quantified the expression level of miR-194. We discovered that the expression level of miR-194 was significantly (P = 0.03) lower in type I EC patients with more advanced stage. In addition, patients with higher miR-194 levels have better prognosis than those with lower miR-194 levels (P = 0.0067; Cut-off value of miR-194 = 0.3). These results indicate that miR-194 has potential to serve as prognostic biomarker for EC patients.

Keywords

MiR-194Endometrial cancer

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent malignant tumor occurring in the female genital tract in the United States [1]. Generally EC cases can be classified into two broad categories based on their clinical and pathological features. Around 80% of all the EC cases are Type I EC, endometrioid EC (EEC), which are estrogen-dependent. Most of EEC cases are low stage and low grade, and have a better prognosis [2]. In contrast, Type II EC cases are not dependent on estrogen and have more cases in advanced stages, especially serous carcinomas (ESC) or clear-cell carcinomas (CCC), which constitute approximately 10% of all the EC cases. These types of EC are shown to be more aggressive, and have a poor prognosis [2]. Although overall 5-year survival rate of EC patients is relatively higher than those of other gynecologic cancers, around 80% among all stages, certain histological types of endometrial cancer are highly invasive and easily metastatic with low survival rate [3]. Thus there is an emerging need for highly sensitive and specific molecular prognostic biomarkers besides the pathological diagnosis based on the morphological alterations, to better predict the outcome of EC.

In the past 10 years, small regulatory RNAs have gained enormous interests in cancer research. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNA molecules, 18–25 nucleotides in length, that regulate the expression of their target genes by translational arrest or mRNA cleavage mostly via direct interaction with the 3′-UTRs of the target mRNAs [4, 5]. Base pairing between at least six consecutive nucleotides within the 5′-seed of the miRNA with the target site on the mRNA is reported to be a minimum requirement for the miRNA-mRNA interaction [6]. miRNAs have been found to regulate many cellular processes including apoptosis [7–10], differentiation [5, 11, 12] and cell proliferation [7, 12–14]. Several reports indicate that aberrant expression levels of certain miRNAs in both plasma and cancer tissue correlates with the EC patients’ survival rate, which can be used as predictive biomarkers [15–17].

Recently the expression pattern and function of miR-194 has been widely studied in various cancers but remains controversial. miR-194 was found to be up-regulated in cancerous tissue when compared to adjacent normal tissue in the esophagus, and its expression level is higher in adenocarcinoma tissue than in squamous cell carcinoma [18]. In addition, the overexpression of miR-194 was found in highly metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines [19]. However, other reports discovered that miR-194 level was down-regulated in colon cancer, colorectal liver metastases, liver cancer and nephroblastomas [20–23], indicating the function of miR-194 is dependent on its cellular context. Ectopic overexpression of miR-194 has been shown to enhance the colon cancer angiogenesis in vivo through inhibition of its target – thrombospondin-1 [24]. In breast cancer cells, the inhibition of HER2 by monoclonal antibody led to upregulation of miR-194. Overexpression of miR-194 induced the inhibition of its target, talin 2, and in turn reduced cell migration and invasion [25]. Similarly, studies from our group have demonstrated the functional significance of miR-194 in endometrial cancer by suppressing BMI-1 expression to regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition [26]. Our results show that ectopic expression of miR-194 in EC cells inhibited its target, BMI-1, to prevent EMT and inhibit tumor invasion. Additional miR-194 targets involved in EMT or metastasis were reported in liver cancer, including N-cadherin, RAC1, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HBEGF), type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) [20].

In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of miR-194 in EC. We quantified the expression level of miR-194 in archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) EC clinical specimens. The expression levels of miR-194 were then correlated with clinical parameters such as disease stage, disease type, and patient survival. Our results show that miR-194 is significantly associated with histology Type I EC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that high levels of miR-194 are associated with a longer survival. As a result, miR-194 may have a potential as a novel prognostic biomarker for EC patients.

Results and discussion

Expression level of miR-194 is inversely correlated with cancer stage in type I EC

In this study, we needle dissected EC tissues from thirty-two FFPE EC specimens and extracted RNAs to quantify the relative expression level of miR-194. We then seperated the patients into two clinical groups based on their pathology reports, early stage (stage I and II) and late stage (stage III and IV). Our analysis results show a trend that the miR-194 level was lower in late stage EC samples (Figure 1A) but not statistically significant (P = 0.2295). To determine whether this expression pattern was associated with histology type, we further seperated the patients based on their histology type (type I and II EC) and clinical stage. We found that miR-194 expression level was significantly downregulated in late stage type I EC samples (Figure 1B, P = 0.0323), however no significant correlation was found in type II EC samples (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

miR-194 expression level decreased in type I EC samples of higher stage. The miR-194 expression level in EC samples was categorized based on pathology stage. There is no significant difference between early stage (I, II) and late stage (III, IV) in overall EC samples (A, P = 0.2295) or type II EC (C, P = 0.7956). However miR-194 expression level was lower in late stage than early stage in type I EC (B, P = 0.0323).

It has been reported that miR-194 regulates cell migration and invasion in various cancer types, including EC, breast cancer and liver cancer [20, 25, 26]. Especially in EC, the target of miR-194 was found to be BMI-1 [26], an important oncogene regulating EMT [27]. We have further demonstrated in our previous studies the functional significance of miR-194 in regulating EMT transition in endometrial cancer by regulating the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin [26]. Overexpression of BMI-1 has been found in many human cancers, including lung cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and EC [28–32]. The Knockdown of BMI-1 in EC cell lines showed similar phenotypes as ectopic expression of miR-194, which led to upregulation of E-cadherin, downregulation of Vimentin and impairment in cell invasion [26]. Consistent with these results, our data showed lower expression of miR-194 in stage III and IV type I EC samples when compared to stage I and II samples, indicating miR-194 was inversely correlated to the cancer aggresiveness. However we did not find any difference in miR-194 expression level in type II EC samples or overall EC samples. One possible reason is that our clinical samples consisted of both type I and II EC samples, which have distinct clinical features. And the seventeen type II EC samples consisted of four different histology subtypes, which contributed to the sample complexation. Larger EC patient cohorts are clearly needed in future studies to fully validate our findings. In addition, due to the limitation of FFPE tissue, we were not able to quantify the protein expression levels of key known miR-194 targets such as BMI-1 and TMP1.

Expression level of miR-194 correlated with EC patients’ suvival time

Since we show that miR-194 is inversely correlated with EC aggressiveness, we reason that miR-194 expression level may affect EC patients’ survival. EC patient survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Mirer survival analyses with miR-194 expression cut-off values as 0.3 (Figure 2). We found that the median survival time of EC patients with low miR-194 levels (less than 0.3) was 14 months, which was significantly shorter than those with higher miR-194 levels (greater than 0.3), 85 months. The overall survival rates of these two groups were significantly different (P = 0.0067), which was independent of the histological type. This is highly consistent with the previous reports that elevated miR-194 target BMI-1 expression is associated with increased tumor invasion and metastasis in endometrial cancer [26].
Figure 2

miR-194 expression level can be used as a prognostic biomarker for EC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of EC patients based on miR-194 expression level. The cut-off expression value of miR-194 = 0.3 (P = 0.0067).

As previous reported, aberrant expression of miRNAs was observed in most tumor types, and multiple clinical screenings showed that miRNAs have a potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers in cancers [33–35]. Moreover, the superior stability of miRNAs in FFPE tissues and various body fluids (plasma, serum, etc.) further facilitates the clinical utility of miRNAs [36, 37]. Our previous studies found that miR-205 was overexpressed in EC tissue compared to adjacent normal tissues, and expression levels of miR-205 were significantly inversely correlated with patient survival [16]. In this study, we discovered miR-194, a critical regulator of EMT transition by suppression of BMI-1, was inversely correlated with patient survival rate, implicating miR-194 as a new candidate prognostic biomarker in EC patients.

Conclusion

Since miRNAs can regulate the expression of multiple targets, they have a broader impact on cancer progression. Due to their superior stability in FFPE tissue, they can be used as diagnostic and prognositic biomarkers for cancer patients. In this study we discovered that the miR-194 expression level was down-regulated in late stage, type I EC patients. The inverse correlation between miR-194 expression level and EC patients’ survival time was independent of histological subtype. These results suggested that miR-194 has potential to serve as a prognostic biomarker for EC patients. Future studies with large multi-center patient cohorts are needed to fully validate the potential of miR-194 as a prognostic biomarker in EC.

Methods

Patients and Samples

Thirty-two endometrial cancer patients, who underwent hysterectomy at Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA, were selected from 1995 to 2010. Patient consent forms were obtained from each patient according to the policies of Institution Review Board. Patient clinical information was provided by the Cancer Registry of Stony Brook University Medical Center, which reported data about patient age, sex, treatment, tumor recurrence and survival for up to 15 years. The characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. Representative tissue blocks from each case were assembled from the archival collections of the Department of Pathology, and used for subsequent analysis.
Table 1

Clinical features of the 32 endometrial cancer patients

Characteristics

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Mean age in years (range)

69 (49–86)

 

Histology

  

Type I EC

Endometrioid carcinoma

15

46.9

Type II EC

17

53.1

Serous carcinoma

8

25

Clear cell carcinoma

5

15.6

Malignant mixed mullerian tumor

3

9.4

Undifferentiated carcinoma

1

3.1

TNM Stage

  

Type I EC

  

I

11

34.4

II

0

0

III

1

3.1

IV

3

9.4

Type II EC

  

I

6

18.8

II

1

3.1

III

4

12.5

IV

6

18.8

Survival (Months)

  

Mean (range)

52 (1–127)

 

0-40

14

43.8

40-80

9

28.1

>80

9

28.1

RNA Isolation

From the archival FFPE tissues, areas of endometrial cancer were identified using the corresponding hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections and cores measuring 1.5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in length (approximately 0.005 g) were extracted. Then the samples were deparaffinized with xylenes, hydrated by using decreasing concentrations of ethanol, and digested with proteinase K. Total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent according to the manufacture’s protocol (Life Technologies, CA, USA).

Real time qRT-PCR analysis of miRNA expression

All reagents for real-time qRT-PCR were ordered from Life technologies. For quantification of miR-194, 10 ng of RNA was used as a template and cDNA was synthesized with high capacity cDNA synthesis kit and miRNA-specific primers (miR-194 and internal control RNU44). Then the cDNA templates were mixed with gene-specific primers for miR-194 and RNU44, and Taqman 2x universal PCR master mix. Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR machine was used for qRT-PCR and programmed as: 95°C, 10 minutes; 95°C, 15 seconds; 60°C, 1 minute, which were repeated for 40 cycles. Fluorescent signals from each sample were collected at the endpoint of every cycle, and the expression level of genes and miR-194 was calculated by ΔC T values based on the internal control, normalized to one control sample from normal endometrium and plotted as relative value (RQ).

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software 5.0. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to examine the relationship between the expression levels of miR-194 and patients’ survival rate. The statistical significance between two groups was determined using unpaired Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical significance is described in figure legends.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the critical reviews of Mr. Andrew Fesler. We appreciate the histology support from Ms. Mallory Korman and Ms. Stephanie Burke. This study was supported in part by R01CA155019 (J. Ju) and R33CA147966 (J. Ju).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Translational Research Laboratory Department of Pathology Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, USA
(2)
Department of Gynecology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine and School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

References

  1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61: 212–236. 10.3322/caac.20121PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bokhman JV: Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1983, 15: 10–17. 10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I: Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2005, 366: 491–505. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V: The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993, 75: 843–854. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-YPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wightman B, Ha I, Ruvkun G: Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 1993, 75: 855–862. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunaratne PH, Creighton CJ, Watson M, Tennakoon JB: Large-scale integration of MicroRNA and gene expression data for identification of enriched microRNA-mRNA associations in biological systems. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 667: 297–315. 10.1007/978-1-60761-811-9_20PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennecke J, Hipfner DR, Stark A, Russell RB, Cohen SM: bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell 2003, 113: 25–36. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00231-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS: MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 2005, 65: 6029–6033. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0137PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghodgaonkar MM, Shah RG, Kandan-Kulangara F, Affar EB, Qi HH, Wiemer E, Shah GM: Abrogation of DNA vector-based RNAi during apoptosis in mammalian cells due to caspase-mediated cleavage and inactivation of Dicer-1. Cell Death Differ 2009, 16: 858–868. 10.1038/cdd.2009.15PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang HW, Mendell JT: MicroRNAs in cell proliferation, cell death, and tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 2006, 94: 776–780. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603023PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang F: Small RNAs in mammalian germline: Tiny for immorta. Differentiation 2010, 79: 141–146. 10.1016/j.diff.2009.11.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Navarro F, Lieberman J: Small RNAs guide hematopoietic cell differentiation and function. J Immunol 2010, 184: 5939–5947. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902567PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, Hernando-Monge E, Mu D, Goodson S, Powers S, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW, Hannon GJ, Hammond SM: A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 2005, 435: 828–833. 10.1038/nature03552PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson CD, Esquela-Kerscher A, Stefani G, Byrom M, Kelnar K, Ovcharenko D, Wilson M, Wang X, Shelton J, Shingara J: The let-7 microRNA represses cell proliferation pathways in human cells. Cancer Res 2007, 67: 7713–7722. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1083PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Torres A, Torres K, Pesci A, Ceccaroni M, Paszkowski T, Cassandrini P, Zamboni G, Maciejewski R: Diagnostic and prognostic significance of miRNA signatures in tissues and plasma of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer 2012. 10.1002/ijc.27840Google Scholar
  16. Karaayvaz M, Zhang C, Liang S, Shroyer KR, Ju J: Prognostic significance of miR-205 in endometrial cancer. PLoS One 2012, 7: e35158. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035158PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiroki E, Akahira J, Suzuki F, Nagase S, Ito K, Suzuki T, Sasano H, Yaegashi N: Changes in microRNA expression levels correlate with clinicopathological features and prognoses in endometrial serous adenocarcinomas. Cancer Sci 2010, 101: 241–249. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01385.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu J, Wang Y, Wu X: MicroRNA in the Pathogenesis and Prognosis of Esophageal Cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2013,19(7):1292–300. 10.2174/138161213804805775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mees ST, Mardin WA, Wendel C, Baeumer N, Willscher E, Senninger N, Schleicher C, Colombo-Benkmann M, Haier J: EP300–a miRNA-regulated metastasis suppressor gene in ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Int J Cancer 2010, 126: 114–124. 10.1002/ijc.24695PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Meng Z, Fu X, Chen X, Zeng S, Tian Y, Jove R, Xu R, Huang W: miR-194 is a marker of hepatic epithelial cells and suppresses metastasis of liver cancer cells in mice. Hepatology 2010, 52: 2148–2157. 10.1002/hep.23915PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahlert C, Klupp F, Brand K, Lasitschka F, Diederichs S, Kirchberg J, Rahbari N, Dutta S, Bork U, Fritzmann J: Invasion front-specific expression and prognostic significance of microRNA in colorectal liver metastases. Cancer Sci 2011, 102: 1799–1807. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02023.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chiang Y, Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, Gao P, Liang J, Zhu J, Xing C, Xu H: microRNA-192, -194 and -215 are frequently downregulated in colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med 2012, 3: 560–566.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Senanayake U, Das S, Vesely P, Alzoughbi W, Frohlich LF, Chowdhury P, Leuschner I, Hoefler G, Guertl B: miR-192, miR-194, miR-215, miR-200c and miR-141 are downregulated and their common target ACVR2B is strongly expressed in renal childhood neoplasms. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33: 1014–1021. 10.1093/carcin/bgs126PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sundaram P, Hultine S, Smith LM, Dews M, Fox JL, Biyashev D, Schelter JM, Huang Q, Cleary MA, Volpert OV, Thomas-Tikhonenko A: p53-responsive miR-194 inhibits thrombospondin-1 and promotes angiogenesis in colon cancers. Cancer Res 2011, 71: 7490–7501. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1124PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Le XF, Almeida MI, Mao W, Spizzo R, Rossi S, Nicoloso MS, Zhang S, Wu Y, Calin GA, Bast RC Jr: Modulation of MicroRNA-194 and cell migration by HER2-targeting trastuzumab in breast cancer. PLoS One 2012, 7: e41170. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041170PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dong P, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Hamada J, Sudo S, Ju J, Sakuragi N: MicroRNA-194 inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition of endometrial cancer cells by targeting oncogene BMI-1. Mol Cancer 2011, 10: 99. 10.1186/1476-4598-10-99PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Colas E, Pedrola N, Devis L, Ertekin T, Campoy I, Martinez E, Llaurado M, Rigau M, Olivan M, Garcia M: The EMT signaling pathways in endometrial carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2012, 14: 715–720. 10.1007/s12094-012-0866-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Vonlanthen S, Heighway J, Altermatt HJ, Gugger M, Kappeler A, Borner MM, van Lohuizen M, Betticher DC: The bmi-1 oncoprotein is differentially expressed in non-small cell lung cancer and correlates with INK4A-ARF locus expression. Br J Cancer 2001, 84: 1372–1376. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1791PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Guo BH, Feng Y, Zhang R, Xu LH, Li MZ, Kung HF, Song LB, Zeng MS: Bmi-1 promotes invasion and metastasis, and its elevated expression is correlated with an advanced stage of breast cancer. Mol Cancer 2011, 10: 10. 10.1186/1476-4598-10-10PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Glinsky GV, Berezovska O, Glinskii AB: Microarray analysis identifies a death-from-cancer signature predicting therapy failure in patients with multiple types of cancer. J Clin Invest 2005, 115: 1503–1521. 10.1172/JCI23412PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang FB, Sui LH, Xin T: Correlation of Bmi-1 expression and telomerase activity in human ovarian cancer. Br J Biomed Sci 2008, 65: 172–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Honig A, Weidler C, Hausler S, Krockenberger M, Buchholz S, Koster F, Segerer SE, Dietl J, Engel JB: Overexpression of polycomb protein BMI-1 in human specimens of breast, ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer. Anticancer Res 2010, 30: 1559–1564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA: MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 2005, 435: 834–838. 10.1038/nature03702PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, Visone R, Iorio M, Roldo C, Ferracin M: A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 2257–2261. 10.1073/pnas.0510565103PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Karaayvaz M, Pal T, Song B, Zhang C, Georgakopoulos P, Mehmood S, Burke S, Shroyer K, Ju J: Prognostic Significance of miR-215 in Colon Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2011, 10: 340–347. 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.06.002PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xi Y, Nakajima G, Gavin E, Morris CG, Kudo K, Hayashi K, Ju J: Systematic analysis of microRNA expression of RNA extracted from fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. RNA 2007, 13: 1668–1674. 10.1261/rna.642907PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 10513–10518. 10.1073/pnas.0804549105PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us