From: BTLA biology in cancer: from bench discoveries to clinical potentials
Group [Ref] | Cancertype | sBTLA in cancer | Correlation with OS |
---|---|---|---|
Wang et al. [103] | ccRCC | - | Yes; negative correlation |
Bian et al. [104] | PDCA | - | Yes; negative correlation Patients with high level of sBTLA (> 1.91 ng/ml) had shorter OS (3.4 vs. 17.4 months) |
Dong et al. [105] | HCC | - | Yes; negative correlation Patients with high level of sBTLA (> 395 pg/ml) had shorter OS (8.4 vs. 20.3 months) |
Fanale et al. [106] | OC | - | Yes; negative correlation Patients with high level of sBTLA (> 2.78 ng/ml) had shorter OS (24 vs. 32 months) |
Wang et al. [107] | PCa | sBTLA levels were associated with cancer aggressiveness | Yes; negative correlation High sBTLA levels correlated with shorter time to progression |
Sordo-Bahamonde et al. [57] | CLL | ↑ sBTLA levels in sera compared to HC; ↑ levels of sBTLA in the advanced Rai vs. 0 stage and Binet C stage; ↑ levels of sBTLA in patients with cytogenetic alterations | Yes; negative correlation |
Gorgulho et al. [108] | solid malignancies | ↑ sBTLA levels compared to HC; Correlation of sBTLA levels with the frequency of peripheral blood CD3 + CD8 + BTLA + T-cells; ↑ sBTLA levels in patients with the UICC stage IV than stage III | Yes; negative correlation Patients with high level of sBTLA (311.64 pg/mL) had shorter OS (138 vs. 526 days) |
Świderska et al. [109] | EOC | ↑ serum and peritoneal fluid sBTLA levels compared to HC | Yes; negative correlation |
Wang et al. [110] | NSCLC | No association found | No correlation |
Peng et al. [111] | NSCLC | sBTLA was rarely expressed in serum | - |
Botticelli et al. [112] | HNCa | No correlation with clinical features found | No correlation |