Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies on cell-free DNA methylation in plasma/serum as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

From: Diagnosing and monitoring pancreatic cancer through cell-free DNA methylation: progress and prospects

Reference

Cases

Controlsa

Relevant Genes

Methodb

Results

Jiao Li et al., 2007 [48]

83 PDAC:

0

ppENK

MSP

p16 (9 patients): sensitivity 70%; specificity 100%

 

16 I-II

    
 

37 III

 

p16

  
 

30 IV

    

Melnikov et al., 2009 [68]

34 PDAC:

19 I-II

2 III

13 IV

30 HC

CCND2

MethDet56

Based on the unmethylated status of the composited biomarker: sensitivity 76%; specificity 59%

   

SOCS1

  
   

THBS

  
   

PLAU

  
   

VHL

  

Ligget et al., 2010 [69]

30 PDAC

30HC

30CP

BRCA12

CCND21,2

CDKN1C1,2

CDKN2B1

DAPK11

ESR11

MGMT1

MLH11,2

MUC21

MYOD11

PGK11

PGR proximal1,2

PGR distal2

RARB1

RB11

SYK1,2

MethDet56

1Methylation of 14 gene promoters distinguishes between CP and PDAC: sensitivity 91.2% (95% CI 76.5-97.1); specificity 90.8% (95% CI 76.1-96.8)

2Methylation of 8 gene promoters distinguishes between HC and CP: sensitivity 81.7% (95% CI 67.3-90.6); specificity 78% (95% CI 63.8-87.7)

Melson et al., 2014 [70]

30 PDAC:

18 I-II

5 III

7 IV

30 HC

VHL

MethDet56

Combined 5 markers to differentiate PDAC from HC: sensitivity 80%; specificity 66%

GPC3: sensitivity 63.3%; specificity 83.3%

MYF3

TMS

GPC3

SRBC

Park et al., 2012 [71]

16 PDAC:

1 I

8 III

7IV

29 HC

UCHL1

MSP

+

bisulfite sequencing

Higher methylation detection in PDAC compared to HC (p<0.05)

NPTX2

SARP2

13 CP

ppENK

Methylated p16 significantly higher in PDAC than in CP (p = 0.016)

p16

RASSF1A

Park et al., 2012 [72]

104 PDAC:

60 CP

NPTX2

qMSP

NPTX2: sensitivity 80%; specificity 76%

24 I-II

5 benign biliary tract stone disease

43 III

37 IV

Kawasaki et al., 2013 [73]

47 PDAC

197: colon, lung, gastric, breast cancers and hepatocarcinoma

APC

MSP

Methylation frequencies:

DCC

p16

RASSF1A 34% APC 23.4%

p14

p16 17% p14 14.9%

RASSF1A

DCC 6.4%

Yi et al., 2013 [74]

42 PDAC:

10 I

32 II-IV

26 HC

BNC1

MOB

BNC1: sensitivity 79% (95% CI 66-91); specificity 89% (95% CI 76-100)

ADAMTS1: sensitivity 48% (95% CI 33-63); specificity 92% (95% CI 82-100)

ADAMTS1

BNC1+ADAMTS1: sensitivity 81% (95% CI 69-93); specificity 85% (95% CI 71-99)

90% sensitivity in stage I for both genes

Henriksen et al., 2016 [75]

95 PDAC:

40 I-II

13 III

42 IV

97 CP

APC

MSP + qMSP

Diagnostic prediction model with 8 genes methylation panel that differentiate malign from benign conditions: AUC=0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91), sensitivity 76%; specificity 83%

Performance of prediction model in early-stages (I-II): AUC=0.86 (95% CI 0.79–0.92), 73% sensitivity; 83% specificity

BMP3

59 acute pancreatitis

BNC1

MESTv2

RASSF1A

27 benign conditions

SFRP1

SFRP2

TFPI2

Henriksen et al., 2017 [76]

95 PDAC:

40 I-II

13 III

42 IV

0

ALX4 1,2

MSP

Two methylation-based prognostic prediction models:

BNC1 1,2

CDKN2B 1,2

HIC1 1

1Methylation of 8 genes that differentiate stage IV from stage I-III disease: AUC=0.87, sensitivity 74%; specificity 87%

MLH1 1,2

NEUROG1 1,2

SEPT9v2 1,2

2Methylation of 8 genes that differentiate stage I-II from stage III-IV disease: AUC=0.82, sensitivity 73%; specificity 80%

SST 1

TFPI2 2

WNT5A 2

Henriksen et al., 2017 [77]

95 PDAC:

40 I-II

13 III

42 IV

0

BNC1

MSP

Gene hypermethylation based survival prediction model (Hazard ratios (95% CI)):

BNC1 2.00 (1.26-3.18); GSTP1 9.55 (2.70-33.82); SFRP1 1.94 (1.24-3.02); SFRP2 0.45 (0.27-0.73) and TFPI2 2.52 (1.42-4.47)

GSTP1

SFRP1

SFRP2

TFPI2

Eissa et al., 2019 [78]

39 PDAC:

37 I-II

2 III-IV

95 HC

8 CP

BNC1

ADAMTS1

qMSP

BCN1: AUC=0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.85), sensitivity 64.1%; specificity 93.7%

ADAMTS1: AUC=0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.95) sensitivity 87.2%; specificity 95.8%

BNC1 + ADAMTS1: AUC=0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) sensitivity 97.4%; specificity 91.6%

Li et al., 2019 [79]

57 PDAC

53 HC

BNC1

SEPT9

qMSP

BCN1: sensitivity 50.9% (95% CI 37.3-64.4); specificity 88.7% (95% CI 77.0-95.7)

SEPT9: sensitivity 36.8% (95% CI 24.5-50.7); specificity 96.2% (95% CI 87.0-99.5)

BNC1 + SEPT9: sensitivity 64.9% (95% CI 55.0-78.8); specificity 86.8% (95% CI 74.7-94.5)

Combined genes + CA19-9: sensitivity 86% (95% CI 74.2-93.7); specificity 81.1% (95% CI 68.0-90.6)

14 PanIN

44 benign conditions

Singh et al., 2020 [80]

61 PDAC:

20 I-II

38 III-IV

2 unspecified

22 HC

UCHL1

PENK

NPTX2

SPARC

qMSP

Methylation index (MI) of 4 genes higher in PDAC than in HC (p < 0.05)

Lower survival in patients with high MI for SPARC and NPTX2 genes (p < 0.05)

21 CP

Shinjo et al., 2020 [81]

47 PDAC:

2 II

41 III-IV

4 unknown

14 HC

ADAMTS2

HOXA1

PCDH10

SEMA5A

SPSB4

MBD-ddPCR

Methylation levels in the 5 genes not significantly different between PDAC and HC

49% of PDAC patients with at least one methylated gene, 49% sensitivity; 86% specificity

DNA methylation in ≥ 1 gene and/or KRAS mutation: sensitivity 68%; specificity 86%

Li et al., 2020 [82]

4 PDAC:

2 II

2 III

2 HC

TRIM73

MeDIP-seq

Combined 8 gene panel: sensitivity 97.1%; specificity 98%

FAM150A

EPB41L3

SIX3

MIR663

MAPT

LOC100128977

LOC100130148

Manoochehri et al., 2020 [83]

30 PDAC:

15 nonmetastatic

15 metastatic

18 HC

SST

ddPCR

SST: sensitivity 93%; specificity 89%

Cao et al., 2020 [84]

67 PDAC:

8 I

26 II

17 III

16 IV

97 HC

5mC

5hmC

MeDIP-seq

5hmC sequencing (hMe-Seal)

A 24-feature 5mC model that can discriminate PDAC from HC, sensitivity 82.4%; specificity 100%

A 27-feature 5hmC model that can discriminate PDAC from HC, sensitivity 85.7%; specificity 100%

The 51-feature model combining 5mC and 5hmC markers: sensitivity 93.8%; specificity 95.5%

Ying et al., 2021 [85]

22 PDAC:

10 HC

ADAMTS1

BNC1

LRFN5

PXDN

MOB-qMSP

Pancreatic cancer detection with 4-gene panel: AUC=0.94, sensitivity 100%; specificity 90%

3 I

15 II

1 III-IV

3 not available

Henriksen et al., 2021 [86]

346 PDAC:

11 I

165 II

33 III

137 IV

25 CP

APC

MSP

Validation study of the diagnostic prediction model proposed in Henriksen et al., 2016: AUC=0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84)

Diagnostic prediction model + CA19-9 in:

Resectable disease (I-II): AUC=0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.95)

Unresectable disease (IV): AUC=0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.98)

Entire cohort: AUC=0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.91)

BMP3

BNC1

MESTv2

RASSF1A

SFRP1

SFRP2

TFPI2

Majumder et al., 2021 [87]

170 PDAC:

5 I

45 II

60 III

60 IV

170 HC

GRIN2D

TELQAS assay

Methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel: AUC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94)

MDM panel + CA 19-9: AUC=0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), sensitivity 92% (95% CI 83-98); specificity 92% (95% CI 81-100)

MDM panel for early-stage detection: AUC=0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.92)

MDM + CA19-9 for early-stage detection: AUC=0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.97)

CD1D

ZNF781

FER1L4

RYR2

CLEC11A

AK055957

LRRC4

GH05J042948

HOXA1

PRKCB

SHISA9

NTRK3

Miller et al., 2021 [88]

25 PDAC:

1 I

7 II

4 III

13 IV

20 HC

ZNF154

MOB-DREAMing

ZNF154 for early stage (I-II): AUC=0.87, sensitivity 100% and specificity 80%

ZNF154 for late stage (III-IV): AUC=0.85, sensitivity 94.1% and specificity 80%

Vrba et al., 2022 [89]

19 PDAC

19 IV

44 benign conditions

MIR129-2

LINC01158

CCDC181

PRKCB

TBR1

ZNF781

MARCH11

VWC2

SLC9A3

HOXA7

qMSP

Biomarker set of 10 genes capable of distinguishing malignant from benign cases: AUC=0.999 (95% CI 0.995-1.0) sensitivity 100% and specificity 95%

Biomarker set useful for monitoring: methylation decrease after treatment (p=3.9x10-3)

García-Ortiz et al., 2023 [90]

44 PDAC

44 IV

2 HC

BMP3

NPTX2

SFRP1

SPARC

TFPI2

ddPCR

NPTX2 methylation distinguished between low- and high-risk poor prognosis patients (p-=6.7x10-3)

NPTX2 methylation dynamics during patients monitoring predict evolution disease and survival: AUC=0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94), sensitivity 85%; specificity 65%

  1. a HC: healthy controls; CP: chronic pancreatitis; PanIN: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia
  2. b MSP: Methylation Specific PCR; qMSP: quantitative Methylation Specific PCR; MOB: Methylation On Beads; MBD-ddPCR: Methyl-CpG Binding Domain- digital droplet PCR; MeDIP-seq: Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation-sequencing; TELQAS: Target Enrichment with Long probe Quantitative Amplified Signal assay; DREAMing: Discrimination of Rare EpiAlleles by Melting