From: Site-specific transgene integration in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
A better defined T cell product Safer therapeutic T cells Functional improvement of CAR T cell therapy Enhancement of some desirable genes Avoiding position-effect variegation Controlled integration of the foreign DNA in the genome | Target site selection and sgRNA design Cas9 activity Delivery methods Simultaneous DSBs can lead to cytotoxicity Gene disruption in CAR T cells can cause unintended innate immune responses DSBs are toxic and can drive genomic instability and cell death |
Continuous CAR expression (random integration into the genome causes substantial variations in CAR expression levels in a batch of CAR T cells because of different transgene copy numbers per cell) | Unpredicted translocations (may occur between double-strand breaks when multiple genes are edited) |
Disrupting tumor microenvironment (TME)-driving immunosuppressors Knocking out of genes targeted by immunosuppressive drugs Knocking out of genes targeted by radiotheapeutic or chemotherapeutic agents Knocking out of genes responsible for T cell apoptosis to enhance cell survival | Off-target effects (introduction of random mutations, thus impacting tumor-suppressor genes or activating oncogenes) |
Minimizing the risks of insertional oncogenesis | Â |
Allowing allogeneic CAR T therapies (due to the disruption of genes involved in Graft-versus-Host Disease) | Â |
Effective against solid tumors (due to the disruption of genes involved in immunosuppressive pathways) | Â |
Reversing T cell exhaustion | Â |
Ablating Fas-induced cell death (using site specific gene-editing methods might lead to an enhancement of CAR T cell function) | Â |