Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Biomarker Research

Fig. 6

From: MRI-based radiomic prognostic signature for locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: development, testing and comparison with genomic prognostic signatures

Fig. 6

Comparison of the prognostic performance of the radiomic model with 7 prognostic genomic signatures and the clinical tumor-node-metastasis stage (cTNM) in terms of concordance index (C-index), on the prospective subset 2 (n = 90 prospective patients). Grey boxplots: C-index of the 7 genomic signatures; blue boxplot: C-index of the cTNM staging; red boxplot: C-index of the radiomic signature (Rad). The C-index of the radiomic model was significantly different (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001, with Tukey-Kramer correction) from that of the cTNM staging and of 6 over 7 genomic signatures (G-1, G-2, G-4, G-5, G-6 and G-7). No statistical difference was found between the C-index of the radiomic signature and G-3

Back to article page

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us