Validation cohorts | Anhui (n = 408) | Beijing (n = 332) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
F0–1 vs F2–4 | F0–3 vs F4 | F0–1 vs F2–4 | F0–3 vs F4 | |
FibroBox | ||||
AUROC (95% CI) | 0.88 (0.84 to 0.92) | 0.87 (0.82 to 0.92) | 0.87 (0.83 to 0.91) | 0.90 (0.85 to 0.94) |
Cut-off values | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.56 |
Sensitivity/specificity (%) | 80/82 | 78/81 | 75/88 | 72/90 |
Correctly classified (%) | 81 | 81 | 82 | 88 |
PPV/NPV (%) | 89/71 | 51/94 | 84/81 | 49/96 |
Positive/negative LR | 4.5/0.2 | 4.1/0.3 | 6.2/0.3 | 7.2/0.3 |
TE | ||||
AUROC (95% CI) | 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88) | 0.84 (0.78 to 0.90) | 0.82 (0.77 to 0.87) | 0.89 (0.85 to 0.94) |
Cut-off values | 7.8 | 11.3 | 7.8 | 11.3 |
Sensitivity/specificity (%) | 77/82 | 75/85 | 77/84 | 95/69 |
Correctly classified (%) | 79 | 83 | 81 | 72 |
PPV/NPV (%) | 88/67 | 55/93 | 79/82 | 29/99 |
Positive/negative LR | 4.4/0.3 | 4.8/0.3 | 4.7/0.3 | 3.0/0.1 |
APRI | ||||
AUROC (95% CI) | 0.66 (0.60 to 0.73) | 0.72 (0.65 to 0.79) | 0.70 (0.65 to 0.76) | 0.75 (0.67 to 0.82) |
Cut-off values | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.62 |
Sensitivity/specificity (%) | 64/70 | 81/56 | 75/58 | 69/69 |
Correctly classified (%) | 67 | 61 | 66 | 69 |
PPV/NPV (%) | 79/54 | 32/92 | 59/74 | 23/94 |
Positive/negative LR | 2.2/0.5 | 1.8/0.3 | 1.8/0.4 | 2.2/0.4 |
FIB-4 | ||||
AUROC (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74) | 0.79 (0.72 to 0.86) | 0.67 (0.61 to 0.73) | 0.70 (0.62 to 0.79) |
Cut-off values | 1.71 | 1.62 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
Sensitivity/specificity (%) | 44/87 | 75/75 | 58/71 | 71/62 |
Correctly classified (%) | 60 | 75 | 65 | 63 |
PPV/NPV (%) | 85/47 | 43/92 | 62/67 | 20/94 |
Positive/negative LR | 3.4/0.6 | 3.0/0.3 | 2.0/0.6 | 1.9/0.5 |
Comparison of AUROC | ||||
FibroBox and TE | < 0.001 | 0.058 | < 0.001 | 0.863 |
FibroBox and APRI | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
FibroBox and FIB-4 | < 0.001 | 0.015 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
TE and APRI | < 0.001 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
TE and FIB-4 | < 0.001 | 0.264 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
APRI and FIB-4 | 0.575 | 0.009 | 0.264 | 0.211 |