| Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Mechanical methods (Centrifugation, Syringe needle method, Vortexing) | Relatively easy and Inexpensive | Increased parasite damage |
Manipulation of thousands of cercariae | Increased risk of infection to researchers (Potential biohazard to the researcher) | |
Replaces the use of live animals | ||
Help to obtain large number of schistosomula | ||
Morphological characteristics identical to schistosmula obtained naturally | Only 25–50% of transformed schistosomula reach the ‘gut-closed’ stage by day 12 | |
Non-mechanical methods (Chemical transformation & Excised skin penetration) | Ideal alternative to obtaining high numbers of viable schistosomula | Significantly less cercariae heads separated from the tails by chemical method |
Simpler Less damaging to the parasites | Low schistosomula yield and the possibility of contamination by host material | |
50–70% of skin transformed schistosomula reach the ‘gut-closed’ stage by day 12 | Require use of live animals (rat, mice, hamster, …) and skilled technician | |
Schistosmula are obtained naturally | Less appropriate technique for high throughput |