From: Detection of circulating tumor cells: opportunities and challenges
Name | Basics Properties | Limitations | (Pre)clinical Application | Recovery rate (%) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Immunobead Assays | |||||
CellSearch® system | consists of ferrofluids coated with epithelial cell specific EpCAM antibodies; fluorescent labeling; immunohistochemical techniques | omitting CTCs expressing low levels of EpCAM; low frequency and large blood volumes demand; cells captured appear to be more apoptotic | FDA approved for advanced prostate, breast and colorectal cancers | ≥85 | |
Weissenstein et al | a combination of anti-EpCAM and anti-cytokeratin magnetic cell separation | cells captured appear to be apoptotic | CTC levels were measured in MBC patients to assess prognostic value | 78-90 | [16] |
MagSweeper | anti-EpCAM antibody-targeting immunomagnetic beads; characterize cells for multiple marker | omitting CTCs expressing low levels of EpCAM; cells captured appear to be apoptotic | capture live CTCs from BC patients for single cell analyses | 55-69 | [53] |
IsoFlux™ Rare Cell Access System | a combination of flow control and immunomagnetic capture; Multiple kits for lab usage are available for cell enrichment and downstream analysis | Maximum daily analysis is 12 samples biomarker heterogeneity of CTCs | patients presenting ≥4 CTCs per blood draw were analyzed with prostate and colorectal cancers; KRAS mutations rate in CRC were described | ≥74 | [90] |
AdnaTest® | incubate blood samples with an antibody mixture (e.g. anti-EpCAM and anti-MUC1); a magnetic particle concentrator extracts the labeled cell detect CTCs via RT-PCR assay for tumor-associated transcripts | biomarker heterogeneity of CTCs; magnetic beads may attach to the tube wall | a combined analysis of CellSearch® and AdnaTest® leads to an improved detection of CTCs in mCRC patient; prognosis prediction and efficacy evaluation in breast, prostate cancer | 88 | |
CTC-μChip | incubation with anti-EpCAM targeting immunomagnetic nanobeads; characterize gene expression using RT-ddPCR | omitting CTCs expressing low levels of EpCAM | CTC enumeration and genetic analysis in blood of patients with prostate cancer | > 90 | |
DynaBeads® | bind to desired target and beads responding to magnetic field | Only 3 types of DynaBeads are available for human tumor cell isolation | enumerate CD4+ T lymphocytes in HIV-1-infected individuals; not test in cancer patients | 44 ± 23 | [94] |
MACS | CD45 leukocyte depletion method; utilize cytokeratin immunocytochemistry to analyze enriched cells | CTC expressing CD45 maybe remove from the sample; erythrocyte lysis cause damage to CTCs | CTC enumeration used in breast, lung, liver esophageal cancer patients; morphologically intact tumor cells were not detected in the clinical application | 70-88 | |
EasySep | anti-CD45 for removal of blood leukocytes | CTC expressing CD45 maybe remove from the sample | CTCs were detected in all of the BC patients (23/23) | 24 ± 19 | |
GILUPI CellCollector | ex vivo Functionalized Structured Medical Wire is antibody coated and applied into peripheral arm vein Isolation in vivo and overcomes sample blood volume limitations | Only used for extraction of CTCs directly from patient’s bloodstream | in vivo isolation of CTCs in patients with different stages of prostate cancer; distinguish between CTCs isolated from benign and malignant nodules | 41 | |
3DPIC | incubation with anti-EpCAM targeting immunomagnetic nanobeads Utilize ATP luminescence assay for the detection of cancer cells in blood | extracellular ATP derived from non-CTCs may interfere with the measurement | the ATP luminescence assay can detect as low as 10 cells in blood; not test in cancer patients | 80 | [92] |
Physical Property-Based Assay | |||||
microfluidic ratchet mechanism | distinguish CTCs based on cell deformability; deform cells in continuous flow without accumulating cells in the separation microstructure; the separated cells are available for downstream characterization | cellular damage; throughput limitation | detect CTC in a considerable proportion with clinically localized PC patients | > 90 | |
ISET® | Utilizes a filter-based, size exclusion approach to isolate epithelial cells; high throughput | morphology and size heterogeneity; damage or fragment CTCs on the result of multi-step cell processes | ISET® has a relatively good detection rate for CTCs in BC and NSCLC patients; fail to provide more information on pathological staging and molecular classification | 75 | |
Metacell Filtration® | Size based separation technique driven by capillary-action; allow cytomorphological and immunocytochemical analysis of CTCs | Filters have a larger pore size (8 μm) | CTCs were detected in 66.7% evaluable PaC patients and the captured cancer cells displayed plasticity | 66.7 | |
ScreenCell | size-based microfiltration; high CTC capture efficiency with processing 3 ml of blood per sample | unable to capture CTCs smaller than WBCs; erythrocyte lysis may cause damage to CTCs | the presence of CTCs does not influence prognosis in operated patients with NSCLC | 89 | |
Parsotrix™ | size and compressibility-based platform for CTCs isolation; ability to capture CTC clusters; harvests CTCs with both epithelial and mesenchymal features | CTC heterogeneity regarding size | Parsortix-enriched and stained cells were successfully transferred with preservation of cell morphology; not tested in clinical application | > 90 | |
Dielectrophoresis (DEP) | isolation based on polarizability and size; discriminate between cells of similar size having different morphological origins | requires specific parameters such as cell type and electric field frequency; the extent to which DEP will be applicable of CTC isolation in different types of cancer is unclear | concentrate MCF7 cancer cells from leukocytes; not test in cancer patients | > 90 | |
OncoQuick | polypropylene tube is inserted above the separation medium which allows for elimination of unwanted blood cells; High throughput, inexpensive | loss of sample while depleting mononuclear cells; detection depends upon only cytokeratine-20 biomarker | detect epithelial cells by RT-PCR targeting CEA, CK20, and TEM-8 in colorectal carcinoma patients; CTCs in breast cancer are correlated to bone marrow micrometastases | 87 | |
Ficoll | density gradient centrifugation | numerous cytospins had to be evaluated because of the low sensitivity; numerous “contaminating” MNCs in the enriched cell fraction lead to false-positive results | detection of CTCs is of prognostic relevance in BCBM patients | 84 | |
AccuCyte® | density-based cell separation; allows virtually complete harvesting of the red blood cells without cell lysis or wash steps | cellular damage; viable cells recovery rate | the median CTC count was 5 circulating prostate cancer cells/7.5 mL (range, 0-20) | 90-91 | |
RosetteSep | unneeded cells are cross-linked with RBCs by specific antibodies to form a dense immune rose structure; unlabeled and highly purified target cells are left at the interface between plasma and density gradient centrifuge during density gradient centrifugation | cause inherent cell loss and morphologic changes during the spinning and wash steps | CTCs were detected in 54% (15/28) of MBC patients, 64% (16/25) of advanced stage HNC patients | 36 ± 18 | |
SPPCN | based on the surface charge of cancer cells serum protein-coated electrically charged nanoparticles can trap different cancer cells | repeated magnetic separation and washing cause cells loss | 2-8 CTCs has been isolated from 1 mL of blood; only 0-1 CTC was detected from 10 healthy donors’ blood samples | 50-89 | [75] |
DEP-FFF Device | DEP crossover frequencies of CTCs that are distinct from those of peripheral blood cell subpopulations and would permit them to be isolated from blood. | throughput limitation; Cannot be routinely applied in the biomedical and basic science labs | offer higher discrimination and throughput than earlier DEP trapping methods; not test in cancer patients | 92 | [7] |
ApoStream® | using dielectrophoretic technology in a microfluidic flow chamber; overcomes throughput limitations; high precision and linearity of recovery of viable; cancer cells | may cause cellular damage | be used to detect FRα(+) CTCs and may have clinical utility for assessing FRα levels in cancer patients; detect EMT-CTCs among patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy | 75.4 ± 3.1; 71.2 ± 1.6 | |
Functional Assays | |||||
ELISPOT | enriches cells via a depletion of the CD45+ hematopoietic cells and detects proteins shed/ secreted/ released from single epithelial cancer cells; a multi-parameter analysis revealing a CTC/DTC protein fingerprint | requires efficient antigen binding and specific epitope presentation; high antigen levels demand; transition into in vitro cultures decrease cell viability and reduce detection rates | measure the release of cytokeratin-19 (CK19) and mucin-1 (MUC1) in BC; measure the release of PSA in prostate cancer; | – | [78] |
CAM assay | based on CTC invasiveness compared to other cells; effective enrichment and identification based on CTC invasiveness; downstream analysis is possible. | isolation step requires more than 12 hours; biomarker dependent | capture invasive CTCs in mCRPC, mNSCLC and mPDAC | 54 ± 9 | [79] |
Nanoroughened Surfaces | utilize the differential adhesion preference of cancer cells to nanorough surfaces | adhesion strength of cancer cells might be affected by nanotopographic sensing; may cause cellular damage | efficiently capture different kinds of cancer cells (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, Hela, PC3, SUM-149); not test in cancer patients | > 80 | [79] |
TelomeScan | Detects elevated telomerase activity via a telomerase-specific replication selective adenovirus | May also detect hematopoietic stem cells for false-positive results | The sensitivity of CTC detection was 69.1% in NSCLC patients; Patients with positive EMT-CTCs at baseline had poor response to chemotherapy and decreased PFS | 97 | |
Microdevices | |||||
eLoaD microfluidic platform | Anti-EpCAM was immobilized on gold electrodes; quantifies CTCs by using label-free electrochemical impedance; | CTCs expressing low levels of EpCAM are unlikely to be captured | perform five different assays in parallel with linear dynamic range between 16,400 and (2.6 ± 0.0003) × 106 cancer cells/mL of blood; not test in cancer patients | 87 | [98] |
NanoVelcro | utilize an anti-EpCAM-coated SiNS to achieve significantly enhanced capture of CTCs Thermoresponsive NanoVelcro chips have demonstrated the capture and release of CTCs at 37 and 4 °C | Only EpCAM-positive CTCs are detected | clinical applications of each generation for various types of solid cancers (prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma) | > 85 | [99] |
iMECH | deformation-based separation of CTCs from whole blood; enable label-free biomechanical profiling of individual cells for distinction; provide a low-cost yet high-throughput for single-cell level metastatic detection | detect non-metastatic cells for false-positive results; may cause cellular damage | MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells exhibit a loss of resistance; not test in cancer patients | 95 identified as metastatic | [100] |
Size-Selective Microcavity Array | separate cancer cells from the blood in accordance with differences in the size and deformability; approximately 98% of viable recovered cells; fast samples processing speed (200-1000 μL/min) | clogging of cavities; size-heterogeneity | detect approximately 97% of NCI-H358 cells in 1 mL whole blood spiked with 10-100 lung cancer cells; not test in cancer patients | > 80 | [127] |
PDMS microfiltration chip | PDMS microfiltration membrane; size-based separation of CTCs from whole blood | size-heterogeneity; balance the recovery rate and purity | achieved great recovery from lung cancer cells spiked blood samples; a high processing throughput of 10 mL/h; not test in cancer patients | > 90 | [53] |