Skip to main content

Table 1 Study patients’ characteristics

From: Lysyl oxidase expression is associated with inferior outcome and Extramedullary disease of acute myeloid leukemia

 

all AML

n = 683

LOX-low group

n = 411, 60%

LOX-high group

n = 272, 40%

p-value

age at diagnosis

median (range)

46 (16–60)

47 (16–60)

50 (18–60)

0.045

Gender, Female, no. (percent)

364 (53)

226 (55)

138 (51)

0.276

Bone marrow blasts at diagnosis

[percent] median (range)

60.5 (3–100)

63.25 (8–100)

54.25 (3–96)

< 0.001

WBC count at diagnosis

[Gpt/L] median (range)

14.5 (0.3–353)

26.1 (0.3–353)

6.5 (0.6–243.4)

< 0.001

Platelet count at diagnosis

[Gpt/L] median (range)

52 (4–1308)

51 (4–1308)

52 (4–793)

0.626

Serum LDH at diagnosis

[U/l] median (range)

492 (100–7369)

527 (144–5934)

389 (100–7369)

< 0.001

FLT3-ITD mutational status positive, no. (percent)a

167 (25)

122 (30)

45 (17)

< 0.001

NPM1 mutational status positive, no. (percent)b

226 (33)

155 (38)

71 (26)

0.002

Combined NPM1/FLT3 status, no. (percent)

NPM1 wt/FLT3 wt

377 (56)

204 (50)

173 (65)

< 0.001

NPM1 wt/FLT3 mut

70 (10)

46 (11)

24 (9)

NPM1 mut/FLT3 wt

130 (19)

80 (20)

50 (19)

NPM1 mut/FLT3 mut

96 (14)

75 (18)

21 (8)

Disease status at diagnosis, no. (percent)

 De novo AML

603 (88)

378 (92)

225 (83)

0.001

 t-AML

35 (5)

17 (4)

18 (7)

 mdsAML

45 (7)

16 (4)

29 (11)

FAB subtypes at diagnosis, no. (percent)

 M0

27 (4)

11 (3)

16 (6)

0.001

 M1

134 (20)

96 (23)

38 (14)

 M2

204 (30)

119 (29)

85 (31)

 M4

88 (13)

62 (15)

26 (10)

 M4eo

36 (5)

28 (7)

8 (3)

 M5a

71 (10)

35 (8)

36 (13)

 M5b

22 (3)

11 (3)

11 (4)

 M5 other

7 (1)

4 (1)

4 (1)

 M6

23 (3)

9 (2)

14 (5)

 M7

6 (1)

3 (1)

3 (1)

 RAEB

19 (3)

9 (2)

10 (4)

 RAEB-T

33 (5)

17 (4)

16 (6)

Cytogenetic subgroups, no. (percent)

 adverse risk

157 (23)

65 (16)

92 (34)

< 0.001

 intermediate risk

444 (65)

287 (70)

157 (58)

 favorable risk

82 (12)

59 (14)

23 (8)

Common cytogenetic aberrations, no. (percent)

 Complex karyotype

90 (13)

42 (10)

48 (18)

0.005

 Normal karyotype

347 (49)

242 (59)

95 (35)

< 0.001

 t(8;21)

39 (6)

26 (6)

13 (5)

0.394

 inv16

43 (6)

33 (8)

10 (4)

0.022

 monosomy 5

7 (1)

3 (1)

4 (1)

0.347

 del5q

48 (7)

20 (5)

28 (10)

0.007

 monosomy 7

30 (4)

14 (3)

16 (6)

0.122

 del7q

20 (3)

9 (2)

11 (4)

0.159

 monosomy other than chromosomes 5 or 7

43 (6)

17 (4)

26 (10)

0.004

 trisomy 8

74 (11)

31 (7)

43 (16)

0.001

 t(9;11)

17 (2)

4 (1)

13 (5)

0.002

 abnl(11q23)

59 (9)

22 (5)

37 (14)

< 0.001

Extramedullary manifestation of AML, no. (percent)

59 (9)

28 (7)

31 (11)

0.037

  1. Table 1 The study patients’ characteristics at diagnosis are listed
  2. Abbreviations: AML acute myeloid leukemia, FAB French American British classification of acute leukemia, FLT3-ITD, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, mut mutated, NPM1 Nucleophosmin 1, RAEB refractory anemia with excess blasts, t-AML therapy-related AML, mdsAML AML with preceding MDS, WBC white blood count, wt wildtype
  3. aFLT3 mutation screening was performed in n = 678 patients at initial diagnosis
  4. bNPM1 mutation screening was performed in n = 674 patients at initial diagnosis